Chapter 88 - Cerebrovascular disease diagnostics Flashcards
Sensitivity and specificity of carotid imaging modality at different stenosis levels
TABLE 88.1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be256/be25688bf37a424536f92605b5d7fcb7c5cb9ee4" alt=""
Consensus panel gray-scale duplex criteria for ICA stenosis
TABLE 88.2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e50f5/e50f5efff6875efa4c4ff33a590387ce69303d40" alt=""
AbuRahma adjustment on duplex ICA criteria
50-69 stenosis should change from 125-230 to 140-230
Duplex in vertebrobasilar disease
only for flow direction extent of disease and anatomic information requires CTA/MRI
Patients undergoing cabg should have duplex carotid/vert if these exist
1) LM disease 2) carotid bruit 3) previous CVA 4) IMA being used with weak radial pulse
SVS screening suggestion for carotid
55 years old with CV risk 2014 US preventive service task force against this
Chance of bilateral carotid body tumours
5%
First line assessment for carotid body tumour
duplex
Glomus vagale tumor differs from carotid body tumor
1) GVT does not splay carotid bifurcation 2) GVT causes displacement of distal ICA 3) GVT have vascular serpignous feeding vessels from proximal vagus nerve
ICA stump syndrome
1) clot in ICA stump form thrombus 2) embolize to ECA 3) enter brain via supra- and infraorbital vessel collaterals
Percentage of CEA done with duplex
95%
Duplex alone for pre-op planning downside
1) tortuous or kinky distal ICA not seen 2) tandem lesions may be missed
Nicolaides classification for plaque characteristics on duplex
TABLE 88.4 HALF
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b1586/b1586653aaa2e038c8217821dd053c922c22a449" alt=""
Asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of stroke (ACSRS) identified US factors associated with stroke
1) plaque area <40 mm 1% vs > 80 mm 4.6% annually 2) JBA < 4 0.4% vs > 10 mm 5% 3) > 3 plaque ulcer 6% compared to < 3 0.6%
imaging in carotid angioplasty and risk of stroke (ICAROS) study
GSM < 25 has 7.1% stroke GSM > 25 has 1.5% stroke
Corrugation on ultrasound
Patch corrugation is wrinkling indicative of patch infection
Duplex showing dampened waveform in proximal CCA suggest
inflow stenosis
High resistance flow in distal ICA suggest
distal tandem lesion
Contralateral occlusion or severe stenosis can cause this
ipsilateral higher PSV due to hyperemic collateralization overestimate degree of ipsilateral stenosis
Subocclusion of carotid artery
1) low flow (< 20 cm/s) and does not return to normal calibre 2) if high flow and if duplex performed within 2 weeks of event, then need corroborative imaging
Management of true subocclusion of carotid
no surgery no benefit not a risk predictor for subsequent stroke
Limitation of CEMRA in carotid
1) soft tissue not well visualized 2) bony structure not present 3) calcium within plaque not well defined
Time of flight MRA
1) better spatial resolution to measure stenosis severity 2) assess flow directionality in steal phenomena 3) cannot see COW or arch concurrently
CEMRA key points
1) gadolinium (paramagnetic agent) 2) fewer artifact providing high resolution imaging of arch up to COW
ABCD2 score
clinical scoring system to predict 48 hr and 7d risk of stroke 1) age 2) blood pressure 3) clinical presentation (0-2) 4) duration of symptoms (0-2) 5) diabetes max score 7
risk of stroke based on ABCD2 and CT/MRI finding
TABLE 88.5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afc05/afc055d1513980195d17a1113cd9c1433e861634" alt=""
contraindication to MRI
1) metallic implants 2) claustrophobia 3) obesity 4) chronic renal impairment
CT PET in carotid disease
no evidence limited by inaccessibility, cost and lack of relevance
Benefit of MDCTA in carotid disease
1) fast 5 sec arch to vertex 2) cheaper than CEMRA 3) 0.3 mm spacial resolution (0.8 for mra, 0.2 for dsa) 4) high quality 2d and 3d reformats 5) faster processing time 6) soft tissue visualization 7) rapidly demonstrate vascular anomalies 8) provides data on extent of calcification
downside of MDCTA on vertebrobasilar imaging
good anatomy cannot show directionality
Significance of carotid artery wall thickness
> 1 mm thickness associated with increased risk of stroke only seen on MDCTA
When to perform CTA after CEA when pt has neurologic deficit
1) if completion DU or DSA was done and normal 2) if > 24 hours after surgery
Stroke after DSA diagnosis in ACAS
2.6% death 0.06%
MCA velocity above this can tolerate carotid ligation
TCD 15 cm/s
Role of TCD in CEA
1) determine if spontaneous embolization occured during exposure 2) determine shunt function (3% don’t work on insertion) 3) determine MCA velocity > 15 cm/s (if not then raise BP) 4) determine if pt will thrombose ICA before operation completed