Chapter 4 Review Flashcards

1
Q

Epistemologists

A

A school of thought that believed experience, scientific study, and induction were effective ways of learning about the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Epistemologists were primarily a “practical subordinate” focus for rhetoric:

A

Favored a clear and simple style to clearly communicate scientific discoveries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bacon’s aim of rhetoric

A

Rhetoric can enlighten the understanding, please the imagination, move the passions, and influence the will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Argumentation

A

The rhetorical process of using reasoned discourse to influence the beliefs of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Refutation

A

Countering the claims of an arguer with evidence, reasoning, or other techniques.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Presumptions (Whately)

A

“pre-occupation of the ground” by a side in a controversy.

ex. current policy—and those who support it—would have presumption, because the policy currently exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Burden of proof (Whately)

A

“lies on the side of him who would dispute it”

ex. you want to change the policy, you would have the burden to prove that it should change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Whately’s View of Rhetoric

A

the art of ‘reasoned discourse,’ as governing that sort of composition in which conclusions are inferred from premises according to the laws of logic

Narrowed rhetoric to a study of argumentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Bacon (17th Century Renaissance)
1st Fallacy

A
  1. Tribe- relates to inherent limitations in the nature of humans to reason and attain knowledge

ex. We are inherently limited in our ability to understand all the issues of an election campaign

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Second Fallacy (idol)

A

Cave- points to individual traits that prevent knowing.

ex. we are biased, prejudiced and/or incapable of grasping certain concepts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Third Fallacy (idol)

A

Marketplace- refers to problems inherent in language that prevent clear communication.

ex. consider examples of when presidential candidates say they are or are not in favor of affirmative action. This term has a wide variety of meanings within our culture, and not all people may use the term in the same way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fourth Fallacy (idol)

A

Theatre: refers to fallacies in philosophy and theory that obscure experiential ways of knowing.

ex. The framework we use to think about politics does not always accommodate third parties, and people mistakenly think they only have two choices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Toulmin (1958)

A

His model for argument construction offered a way to classify and assess arguments
Key parts: Data (or grounds), warrant, claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Data

A

The facts that serve as the foundation for the claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Warrant

A

The systematic rationale for moving from data to claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Claim

A

The explicit appeal produced by an argument.

17
Q

Particular audience

A

The audience that is physically present for a speech.

18
Q

Universal audience

A

All potential audience members.

19
Q

Perelman (1982)

A

Persuasion is a form of argumentation that claims validity only for a particular audience while convincing is a type of argumentation that holds true for an audience of “every rational being”

it is the audience that the speaker seeks to influence by argument