Chapter 4 Review Flashcards
Epistemologists
A school of thought that believed experience, scientific study, and induction were effective ways of learning about the world.
Epistemologists were primarily a “practical subordinate” focus for rhetoric:
Favored a clear and simple style to clearly communicate scientific discoveries
Bacon’s aim of rhetoric
Rhetoric can enlighten the understanding, please the imagination, move the passions, and influence the will
Argumentation
The rhetorical process of using reasoned discourse to influence the beliefs of others
Refutation
Countering the claims of an arguer with evidence, reasoning, or other techniques.
Presumptions (Whately)
“pre-occupation of the ground” by a side in a controversy.
ex. current policy—and those who support it—would have presumption, because the policy currently exists
Burden of proof (Whately)
“lies on the side of him who would dispute it”
ex. you want to change the policy, you would have the burden to prove that it should change.
Whately’s View of Rhetoric
the art of ‘reasoned discourse,’ as governing that sort of composition in which conclusions are inferred from premises according to the laws of logic
Narrowed rhetoric to a study of argumentation
Bacon (17th Century Renaissance)
1st Fallacy
- Tribe- relates to inherent limitations in the nature of humans to reason and attain knowledge
ex. We are inherently limited in our ability to understand all the issues of an election campaign
Second Fallacy (idol)
Cave- points to individual traits that prevent knowing.
ex. we are biased, prejudiced and/or incapable of grasping certain concepts.
Third Fallacy (idol)
Marketplace- refers to problems inherent in language that prevent clear communication.
ex. consider examples of when presidential candidates say they are or are not in favor of affirmative action. This term has a wide variety of meanings within our culture, and not all people may use the term in the same way.
Fourth Fallacy (idol)
Theatre: refers to fallacies in philosophy and theory that obscure experiential ways of knowing.
ex. The framework we use to think about politics does not always accommodate third parties, and people mistakenly think they only have two choices.
Toulmin (1958)
His model for argument construction offered a way to classify and assess arguments
Key parts: Data (or grounds), warrant, claim
Data
The facts that serve as the foundation for the claim.
Warrant
The systematic rationale for moving from data to claim.