Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

POLY SCI 201 > Chapter 3 Notes > Flashcards

Chapter 3 Notes Flashcards

1
Q

Three types of systems that apportion governmental power

A
  1. Unitary
  2. Confederacy
  3. Federal system
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

National government is sovereign

A

Unitary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

States are sovereign

A

Confederacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

National government and states share power

A

Federal system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Single centered, admin units

A

Unitary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Units “collaborate”

A

Confederal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is sovereignty?

A

The right to rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Shared sovereignty

A

Federalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dual federalism original recipe?

AKA?

A

NATIONAL
STATE
LOCAL
- Layer cake federalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the argument for federalism?

  • Authority divided into 2 levels:
  • Protects:
  • Moderates government power by:
  • Strengthens the:
  • Promotes more:
A
  • National and state
  • Protects liberty
  • Moderates government power by sharing
  • Strengths the union
  • Promotes more responsive government
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Limits government by stating specific powers in the Constitution

A

Grants of power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Limits government by stating specific prohibitions in the Constitution
- Proposal of amendments

A

Denials of power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Wanted “We the states” not “We the People”. Anti-federalist

A

Patrick Henry

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The powers of the national government are in ? and ?

A

Enumerated powers
and
Implied powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  • Seventeen powers, including measures for secure defense and stable commerce
  • Supremacy clause
A

Enumerated powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  • Necessary and proper= elastic clause: makes laws in support of enumerated powers
A

Implied powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The tenth amendment established what?

A

Reserved powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Powers not delegated to the national government are reserved for the states

A

Reserved powers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Using the power of money to “coerce” cooperation. Federal funds for state programs.

A

Fiscal federalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Whats the golden rule?

A

Those that have the gold, rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q
  • States and national cooperate
  • Shared policy responsibilities
  • Achieve mutually desired goals
A

Cooperative federalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Examples of cooperative federalism

A
  • land grant colleges

- medicare/medicaid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Precise separation of national and state authority is both possible and desirable

A

Dual federalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

The ___ amendment interpreted to give states much discretion

A

14th

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Supreme Court limited national power to regulate business and industry

A

Judicial protection of business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What is an example of dual federalism? How?

A

National Guard. Traditionally held under state control. Funding goes through federal to state. Have the option to switch line of authority to federal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Switching time that saved 9 under

A

FDR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

2 purposes of federal grants?

A

Money
- Give local/state needed $$$
Politics
- Allow for needed local services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Government revenues and intergovernmental relations:

  • fiscal federalism
  • grants in aid
  • categorical grants
  • block grants
A

Contemporary federalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Federal funds used for state programs

A

Fiscal federalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Cash payments to state and local identities

A

Grants-in-aid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Federal funds restricted to certain state programs

A

Categorical grants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Federal funds for state programs addressed to a general concern

A

Block grants

34
Q

The idea that American federalism can be strengthened by a partial shift of power from national government to states

A

Devolution

35
Q

Devolution:

  • Belief held more strongly by ___ than ____
  • Dramatically increased with what in 1994?
A
  • By Republicans than Democrats

- Republican Revolution of 1994

36
Q

Who has advanced devolution? When did the movement end?

A

Supreme Court
Presidency of George W Bush
-education and security policy

37
Q

What is THE BIG LIE

A

” Im from the government and I’m here to help you”

38
Q

Roosevelt’s “New Deal” provided for what?

A

Jobs during the Great Depression

39
Q

Lyndon Johnson’s “Great society” provided for what?

A

Increased social services in 1960s

40
Q

Republican Revolution provided for what?

A

Rolled back federal authority in 1990s

41
Q

Who wrote the West Wing and A Few Good Men?

A

Aaron Sorkin

42
Q

Who wanted a Confederacy over a Constitutional Republic?

A

Patrick Henry

43
Q

What were the 4 major goals of the framers of the Constitution?

A
  1. To establish a government strong enough to meet the nation’s needs
  2. To establish a government that would not threaten the existence of the states– an objective sought through federalism
  3. To establish a government that would not threaten liberty.
  4. To establish a government based on popular sovereignty
44
Q

What happens with the Supremacy Clause?

A

The National government always wins over the state govts

45
Q

Background on Marbury v. Madison (general idea, don’t have to give exact details)

A

The case began on March 2, 1801, when an obscure Federalist, William Marbury, was designated as a justice of the peace in the District of Columbia. Marbury and several others were appointed to government posts created by Congress in the last days of John Adams’s presidency, but these last-minute appointments were never fully finalized. The disgruntled appointees invoked an act of Congress and sued for their jobs in the Supreme Court.

46
Q

When did Marbury v. Madison happen?

A

1803

47
Q

Result of Marbury v. Madison

A

Struck down a law in 1789 that gave Congress a power against the intent against the Constitution

48
Q

Marbury v. Madison did what?

A

Set the precedent for judicial review

49
Q

Courts determine if governmental institution is acting within its constitutional powers

A

Judicial review

50
Q

In the Pre-Civil war era, what was the main question/dispute?

A

Federal authority or state authority?

51
Q

Pre Civil-War Era:
Which case argued for the nationalist view?
The state’s rights view?

A

Nationalist: McCulloch v. Maryland

State’s Rights: Dred Scott decision

52
Q

Clear ruling in favor of national power and the supremacy clause

A

McCulloch v. Maryland

53
Q

Ruling for states rights in conflict over legality of slavery

A

Dred Scott decision

54
Q

Background of McCulloch v. Maryland

A

In 1816, Congress chartered The Second Bank of the United States. In 1818, the state of Maryland passed legislation to impose taxes on the bank. James W. McCulloch, the cashier of the Baltimore branch of the bank, refused to pay the tax.

55
Q

When did McCulloch v. Maryland happen?

A

1819

56
Q

Result of McCulloch v. Maryland?

A

Increased national authority by affirming the National govt’s authority to establish a national bank

57
Q

Background on Gibbons v. Ogden?

A

A New York state law gave to individuals the exclusive right to operate steamboats on waters within state jurisdiction. Laws like this one were duplicated elsewhere which led to friction as some states would require foreign (out-of-state) boats to pay substantial fees for navigation privileges. In this case Thomas Gibbons – a steamboat owner who did business between New York and New Jersey under a federal coastal license – challenged the monopoly license granted by New York to Aaron Ogden. New York courts consistently upheld the state monopoly.

58
Q

When did Gibbons v. Odgen happen?

A

1824

59
Q

Result of Gibbons v. Odgen?

A

Ruled that Congress had the authority to regulate commerce (between and in the states) through the commerce clause. State laws were UNconstitutional.

60
Q

A major effect of Gibbons v. Odgen?

A

Supreme Court reviewed laws put on the books by STATE legislature. State laws could be declared null and void if they conflict with Constitution.

61
Q

When did the issue with the Dred Scott decision really start?

A

1820 with the Missouri Compromise (provisions that outlawed slavery in northern states, set the state for the Civil War and the election of President Lincoln)

62
Q

When did the Dred Scott decision happen?

A

1857

63
Q

Background on the Dred Scott decision?

A

Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. From 1833 to 1843, he resided in Illinois (a free state) and in an area of the Louisiana Territory, where slavery was forbidden by the Missouri Compromise of 1820. After returning to Missouri, Scott sued unsuccessfully in the Missouri courts for his freedom, claiming that his residence in free territory made him a free man. Scott then brought a new suit in federal court. Scott’s master maintained that no pure-blooded Negro of African descent and the descendant of slaves could be a citizen in the sense of Article III of the Constitution.

64
Q

Result of the Dred Scott decision?

A

Decreased national authority because the Supreme Court ruled that the national government didn’t have the authority to govern property law (ruled that slaves were property)

65
Q

Background of Plessy v. Ferguson?

A

The state of Louisiana enacted a law that required separate railway cars for blacks and whites. In 1892, Homer Adolph Plessy–who was seven-eighths Caucasian–took a seat in a “whites only” car of a Louisiana train. He refused to move to the car reserved for blacks and was arrested.

66
Q

When did Plessy v. Ferguson happen?

A

1896

67
Q

Result of Plessy v. Ferguson

A

States could provide “separate but equal”. Supreme Court said Louisiana’s law is ok. Decreased national authority.

68
Q

Background on Hammer v. Dagenhart

A

The Keating-Owen Child Labor Act prohibited the interstate shipment of goods produced by child labor. Reuben Dagenhart’s father had sued on behalf of his freedom to allow his fourteen year old son to work in a textile mill.

69
Q

When did Hammer v. Dagenhart happen?

A

1918

70
Q

Result of Hammer v. Dagenhart?

A

Decreased national authority. Supreme Court ruled that the federal government does not have the authority to regulate business (state’s responsibility).

71
Q

How is Hammer V. Dagenhart ironic?

A

Because in 1905, Court ruled that state’s could not regulate business because it was protected by property rights granted in Bill of Rights

72
Q

What was the “court packing proposition”?

A

FDR wanted to use federal government to rectify problems. “The switch in time that saved nine” resulted in switch on Court that sided with FDR

73
Q

Background on Brown v. Board of Education?

A

Black children were denied admission to public schools attended by white children under laws requiring or permitting segregation according to the races. The white and black schools approached equality in terms of buildings, curricula, qualifications, and teacher salaries. This case was decided together with Briggs v. Elliott, Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, and Gebhart v. Belton. (A separate but related case – Bolling v. Sharpe – presented the same issue in the context of the District of Columbia, which is not subject to the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment because the District is not a state.)

74
Q

When did Brown v. Board of Education happen?

A

1954

75
Q

Result of Brown v. Board of Education?

A

Increased national authority. Supreme Court ruled that the “separate but equal” law doesn’t work under the 14th amendment. UNCONSTITUTIONAL

76
Q

When did the Miranda case happen?

A

1967

77
Q

Result of Miranda case?

A

Increased national authority. They have to say their rights. The Supreme Court used the Constitution to trump state laws, which increased national authority.

78
Q

Result of Printz v. United States?

What year?

A

Struck down a federal law requiring background checks on the sale of handguns.
1997

79
Q

What was the result of United States v. Lopez?

What year?

A

Struck down a federal law banning guns within 1,000 feet of schools.
1995

80
Q

What does Printz v. US and US v. Lopez show?

A

The federal government doesn’t have the right to regulate guns because of second amendment

POLY SCI 201 (36 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions