Chapter 12 - Deductive Reasoning and Decision-Making Flashcards

Deductive Reasoning and Decision-Making

1
Q

deductive reasoning

A

begin with specific premises that are generally true - allow you to draw a conclusion based on logic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

conditional reasoning

A

if/then structure; valid/invalid only - type of deductive reasoning which describes the relationship between conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

decision-making

A

choosing between 2 or more alternatives (more ambiguous than deductive reasoning)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

syllogism

A

deductive reasoning type - 2 statements that we must assume to be true plus a conclusion - all/none/some - valid/invalid/indeterminate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

affirming the antecedent

A

“if…” part is true = valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

affirming the consequent

A

“then…” part is true = invalid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

denying the antecedent

A

“if” part is false = invalid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

denying the consequent

A

“then” part is false = valid conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

dual process theory

A

type 1 processing = fast automatic

type 2 processing = slow and controlled focused attn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

negative terms

A

add cognitive burden

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

belief bias effect

A

based on prior beliefs or knowledge, related to top down processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

confirmation bias

A

looking for evidence to support a certain claim rather than evidence of the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

decision-making heuristics

A

strategies that tend to produce a correct solution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

representative heuristic

A

we judge a sample to be representative of a larger group and of a prototype - often look for random outcomes more likely than orderly outcomes (e.g. 21.97 vs. 22.22 grocery total - would think the 2222 is unusual but it’s just as common as the others)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

small sample fallacy

A

wrong assumption that a small sample of the population from which it is selected - it’s less likely to be representative of a population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

base rate fallacy

A

paying too little attention base rate (how often something occurs in population)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

conjunction rule

A

the probability of two events cannot be greater than the probability of either event individually happening

18
Q

conjunction fallacy

A

judging that 2 events have greater probability of occurring together than either individual event

19
Q

availability heuristic

A

estimating the frequency or probability of something based on how easy it is to think of examples

20
Q

recency and availability

A

better memory for things you’ve seen recently therefore distorting how frequent you think it occurs

21
Q

familiarity and availability

A

how familiar you are with the issue can impact your impression of how big an issue is

22
Q

recognition heuristic

A

comparing the relative frequency - if you are more familiar with something you might think there is a higher frequency

23
Q

illusory correlation

A

when people believe two variables are connected - often relate to stereotypes

24
Q

anchoring and adjustment heuristic / anchoring effect

A

begin with the first approximation which serves as an anchor an make adjustments from there - e.g. price, first price serves as point of comparison - often relied upon too much and adjustments are too small

25
belief bias
relying too heavily on beliefs
26
confirmation bias
prefer to confirm a current hypothesis rather than reject it
27
anchoring and adjustment heuristic research
kahneman and tversky - starting with 1x8x4 then 8x4 -- estimated that the one starting with the larger number would be higher
28
confidence interval
range within which we expect a number to fall - but can be too confident
29
framing effect
outcome can be influenced by 2 factors background context of the choice the way in which a question is worded or framed ticket $20, lost $20 etc. - issue - perception
30
prospect theory
people's tendency to think possible gains are different from possible gains: possible gains - people avoid risks possible losses - people seek risks to avoid the losses
31
overconfidence about decisions
confidence higher than it shoudl be
32
illusory correlation
confident two variables are related but they're not
33
people overestimate...
their own skills, leaderships abilities, academic sklils, etc.
34
cultural differences
impact confidence
35
planning fallacy
underestimating the amount of time required to complete a project
36
how to avoid planning fallacy
divide project into sub parts and estimate time reqd envision each step try thinking about someone else -how long would they take
37
crystal ball technique
asking decision makers to imagine that a completely accurate ccrystal ball has determined that their favoured hypothesis is incorrect and therefore they must search for alternate eplanations
38
hindsight bias
judgment about events that happened in the past - as though we knew it all along to match our present knowledge
39
maximizers vs. satisficers decision-making style
maximizers - examine as many options as possible and experience more depression and regreT settle for something that is satisfactory, not concerned about another shift that is better at another location
40