Biostats HY Flashcards
Give an intervention to one group and give placebo to other group then compare /record outcomes
Random Controlled Clinical Trial
(RCT)
Compare group of ppl with an uncommon dz (or characteristic) and a group of ppl w/o the dz and look back in time for exposures
Case-Control
(calculate odds Ratio)
Cohort is opposite it looks at exposure first then future dz.
Case control looks dz first then back in time for exposure!
prominent issue with Case Control Studies?
Recall Bias
To do a study on a rare phenomena (or disease)
_____ studies are typically the best option on NBME exams.
case-control study
Which study looks at 2 groups; one with a risk factor/exposure and one w/o risk factor and then follow into future to see if they develop a particular outcome (disease/adverse effect)
Cohort studies
(calculate relative risk)
Lower P value (<0.05) = higher (2)
confidence & power
(that results are not by chance)
which P-value is better?
P<0.05 or <0.01?
P<0.01
means 1% chance that results were due to chance
__% of population with normal distribution should fall within 2 Standard deviations below & above of the mean (average)
95%
Example: SD is 100 and mean is 1000.
2SD below mean = 800
2SD above mean = 1200
95% of population falls within 800-1200
5% must fall outside this range
2.5% less than 800
2.5% higher than 1200
95% of population with normal distribution should fall within __ Standard deviations below & above of the mean (average)
2
Example: SD is 100 and mean is 1000.
2SD below mean = 800
2SD above mean = 1200
95% of population falls within 800-1200
5% must fall outside this range
2.5% less than 800
2.5% higher than 1200
__% of population falls outside 2 Standard deviations below & above of the mean (average)
___% falls above 2 SD of average
___% falls below 2 SD of average
5%
2.5% above 2SD of mean
2,5% below 2SD of mean
Whenever you have 2 confidence intervals overlap in value (or cross each other) that means results are
not significant
(no difference in effectivity between those two things)
In Ratio derived confidence intervals (Relative risk, Odds ratio) if the confidence interval includes (crosses) the number ___ = not significant
1
(can get ONE, if you divide two of the SAME number)
In Difference derived confidence intervals (Average/ percents/proportions, RRR, Attributable Risk, ARR) if the confidence interval includes (crosses) the number ___ = not significant
0
(can get zero, if you subtract two numbers that are the SAME)
3 Rules for figuring out what a value’s Confidence interval is.
Example: Confidence interval of a Relative Risk of 3.5
- Is it a ratio or a difference?
Relative risk is a ratio so CI can’t include #1 (eliminate those ans)
ARR is a difference so CI can’t include #0 - Value cannot start or end the CI
(ex: confidence interval can’t start or end with 3.5) - Value must fall within the CI range of numbers & be nearest the center of the range.
(eliminate all ans that do not include 3.5 within the range)
CI must include the value (ex: 3.5) at the center within the range of numbers, but the value must not start or end the interval and the interval can’t include the number 1 or 0
Calculate Number Needed to Treat & ARR
ARR = (% of pts who died getting DRUG) minus (% of pts who died getting PLACEBO)
──
NNT= 1 ÷ ARR
Calculate Number Needed to Harm
1 ÷ (% of pts harmed by Placebo) minus (% of pts harmed by Drug)
NNH= 1 ÷ AR
Calculate Relative Risk
& Relative Risk Reduction (Decreased Relative Risk)
Relative Risk
(% exposed/intervention + dz) ÷ (% unexposed/control + dz)
(ex: 20% of smokers got Lung cancer/ 10% nonsmoker got lung cancer = 2 → aka smoking increases risk of lung cancer 2-fold)
─
RR = rate of outcome in exposed/ rate of outcome of control
RRR= (1– RR)
What is the Positive & Negative Likelihood ratio formula?
Positive= (Sensitivity/1– Specificity)
Negative= (1– Sensitivity/Specificity)
When to use the positive or negative likelihood ratio on exam to calculate correct answer?
+ve LRs tell you how much more likely a phenomenon is when you have a +ve test result.
-ve LRs tell you how much less likely a phenomenon is when you have a -ve test result.
Quick way to calculate Odds ratio
Odds ratio
(Expected Outcomes )÷ (Odd Outcomes)
─
Expected: (exposed got disease) x (unexposed no disease)
÷
Odd: (exposed no disease) x (unexposed got disease)
How to Calculate Confidence Interval
90% Z-Score = 1.5
95% Z-Score = 2
99% Z-score = 2.5
ROC curves (how well a test can distinguish b/w 2 groups)
The best test (highest sensitivity & specificity) lies at the _____ of the graph.
top left corner
Cohort study, 2 groups of individuals are initially identified as “exposed” or “nonexposed” according to their exposure status to a specific risk factor and then followed into future to assess development of the outcome (incidence of disease).
Case-Control = 1 Uncommon diseases are followed back in time to assess exposure(s)
Cohort = Exposures are followed into future for development of common diseases
68%, 95%, and 99.7% of a normal population lie b/w __, __, & __ SDs of the mean respectively.
1 (68% → 16%)
2 (95% → 2.5%)
3 (99.7%)
Both test require measuring a quantitative (numerical) outcome
Between 2+ qualitative (Intervention/Risk Factor) groups
compares means of 2 groups, ___ test.
compares means of 3+ groups, ___ test.
T test
ANOVA (or F) test
Chi test has qualitative terms for both intervention and outcome
When you incorrectly reject the null
(state there is an effect when there is not an effect)
= a Type __ error.
Type 1 error (alpha error)
(aka false positive error)
When you incorrectly accept the null
(state there is no effect when there is an effect)
= a Type ___ error.
Type 2 error (beta error)
(aka false negative error)
Power = ___
1– beta
Statistical power is the probability of stating that there is an association & it’s actually true.
(aka rejecting a false null hypothesis)
Narrower CIs tell you study is more ___.
precise
However, you should feel a lot less confident in the results of the study bc the CIs are too narrow (less room for error).
Ways to Increase the power of a study (HY!)
Studies with larger sample sizes have greater statistical power, consequently a lower probability of a type II error
- Recruit more people for a study (larger sample size).
- Have a large difference b/w 2 quantities you’re trying to measure (larger effect size).
- Increase measurement precision (how consistent values are)
- lower P values = more power (P<0.01)
- Increase data for a measured qty cluster around 1 value.
FYI
The fact that something is statistically significant does not mean that it is clinically significant
study compares 2+ treatment on one pt and allows them to serve as own controls
Crossover study