***Ben Waterson and Lucy Reed (20.05.24) Forwarded Questions also from both Flashcards
On-line tutorial on Interview and Presentation (RICS website); Guidance for Candidates during interview
ie
Healthy?
Pan laptop
etc
Check out
Presentation duration - 10min15secs (no longer)
Microphone went quiet - check this out.
Slides - size of text needs to be consistent! (later slides looked wrong!)
Check out
Amend
2 assessors will ask case study questions
Chair might take role of one of the assessors if not all present (competency questions)
Supposed to be 15 mins one assessor (tech and mandatory) then 15 mins the other (tech and mandatory) -although might not follow this format.
Note
Focus is on Level 3!!
Address questions at right level ie:
-if question is asking how advise - give answer on how advised/how would advise!!
-if question on give an example - give an example!!
This also demonstrates LISTENING SKILLS!!
Note
Case study question:
How did you establish the Client’s drivers? (Note: this is a Level 2 question ie HOW; also focusing on Client Care)
I discussed with the client!!!!!!
-discussed the briefing document
-discussed the basis the contractor originally awarded.
-discussed there would be variables to cost, time, quality, and risk!!
As mentioned in the Case Study, I identified the drivers as:
i. Cost
ii. Time and Timing
iii. Quality (of execution)
Reviewed the Client’s briefing document
Reviewed the tender documentation (including price/quality scoring split, and the quality questions)
Regularly discussed aspects of the project/progress with the client and sought their views/priorities in particular instances.
Case study question:
How did you know they were satisfied with your advise on the options provided? (Note: this again is Level 2; also focusing on Client Care)
Clearly presented the options, positives and negatives. Obtained confirmation they understood and agreed. Allowed any questioning and answered these. Satisfied their issues had been addressed and the appropriate action was to be taken.
From answer above, I had identified their priorities,
-Provided options based on these priorities
-Presentation in concise and clear manner with advantages and disadvantages
-Presented likelihood of achievement
-Presented recommended option with reasons
-Sought their understanding and agreement/or disagreement that the recommended option provided the best most likely outcome.
-Only proceeded once they confirmed their agreement and no other considerations were required.
Case Study question:
How frequent were the Cabinet meetings?
These were infrequent and depended on the workload requiring Cabinet review:
-They could be monthly at the most frequent, or could be several months
-Next meeting at times could already be booked
-Application sometimes required by client to book an appointment
Case Study question:
Was there a risk/did you investigate whether the tender figure remaining firm period and the frequency of Cabinet meetings posed a risk? ie could a Cabinet review be obtained within the firm cost holding period?
16 weeks for tender to remain firm in the Form of Tender.
(prepared before I got involved in the project), however:
-Prior to tender pack going out - client in advance has already identified a date for the Cabinet Procurement Committee, and timed so that tender returns and analysis are completed a few weeks before the sitting.
-The Client intention that once Cabinet has approved budget, works will proceed.
-Should there be difficulties there would be circa further 3 months to increase budget before firm cost lapsed. This could be tight but not unreasonable.
-Ultimately the decision would be the Client’s
Case Study question:
What legal requirements are you aware of in relation to asbestos?
Control of Asbestos Regulations (CAR)
Case Study question:
What considerations did you give in relation to the effects of trying to Terminate the contract? (open to challenge?)
I understood that Termination based on Frustration could be contested (no provision in contract as Frustration is covered by English Common Law - as a legally defined matter - could need legal interpretation to determine if this would be warranted)
If contested, then this could go to dispute resolution or ultimately litigation.
Costs associated:
i. legal advise and remedy costs
ii. contractor L&E costs
Case Study question:
The ‘control methodology’ you mention in relation to Key Issue 2, Option 3: Did the Client approve this methodology? Did they understand? Did they agree?
In terms of what the control methodology involved:
- refer to Mock WW and JL Deck Flashcards.
Client approval - yes.
Client understand - yes.
Client agree - yes.
In reference to the above ‘yes’s:
Presented the Options
Identified Option 3 as the preferred
Went into more detail on how Option 3 would be implemented (ref Mock WW and JL Flashcards, mentioned above)
Went into detail on what would be required to bring the agreement of the new process about (no need for amendment to contract; agreement between client and contractor captured in Minutes of meetings/correspondences/exchange of shared documentation; incentive for contractor staying with new procedures as already has relationship with client on other projects (partnering incentive);
Revisiting at end of interview is a good opportunity - but not too many!
Note
Tips:
Attitude:
-view the panel as a friendly client.
-they are looking for reassuring answers
Expectations:
-good overall impression
-safe pair of hands
-protecting client and giving good advice.
Note
Lucy Reed Questions (forwarded)
CASE STUDY
- Please can you tell be about the construction of the building of your case study project?
- Please can you talk me through the risks to the project with the properties being occupied?
- You mention re-tendering the works - how would you do this?
- Define value engineering?
- What did you include in your tender report?
- How can a contract be terminated under a JCT contract?
- Are you aware of any upcoming changes to termination clauses in the new JCT 2024.
- Can you talk me through how you presented your advice on one of your key issues?.
Key Issue 1:
-Rang client and arranged a Teams meeting to go through the options.
-At the teams meeting, reminded the client of the problems the issue presented, and confirmed their understanding of why a resolution was required.
-Presented an excel spreadsheet with the 3 options listed and the cost, time, quality implications
-Discussed the risk in achieving each of the options.
-Finished by stating my recommended option and the reason
-Asked for their opinions/queries, and addressed these.
-Sought confirmation they wished to proceed
-Following meeting, issued email stating what was agreed and the actions that would be taken.
ETHICS