Attachment P1 Flashcards

1
Q

Reciprocity

A
  • How two people interact
  • how people respond to each others signals
  • elicit responses from each other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interactional synchrony

A

Caregiver and baby reflect both the actions and emotions of the other in synchrony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Alert phase

A

When babies signal they are ready to interact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Stages of attachment

A
  1. Asocial stage
  2. Indiscriminate stage
  3. Specific stage
  4. Multiple attachments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Asocial stage

A

Similar behaviour towards objects and humans but prefers humans, first few weeks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Indiscriminate stage

A

2-7 months, definite preference for humans, some recognition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Specific stage

A

From 7 months, attachment to one adult. Stranger and separation anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Multiple attachment

A

Shortly after specific attachment, display separation anxiety towards other caregivers too.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Schaffer and Emerson’s research

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

3 types of attachment

A

Secure attachment
Insecure avoidant
Insecure resistant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Secure attachment

A

• moderate proximity seeking
• moderate exploration/ secure base
• moderate stranger anxiety
• moderate separation anxiety
• strong response to reunion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Insecure avoidant

A

• low proximity seeking
• high exploration/ secure base
• low stranger anxiety
• low separation anxiety
• very weak response to reunion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Insecure resistant

A

• high proximity seeking
• low exploration/ secure base
• high stranger anxiety
• high separation anxiety
• low response to reunion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cupboard love

A

Based on the biological approach I think about how love is only developed because the caregiver is a provider of food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Strange situation procedure

A

Procedure has 7 episodes
1. Baby encouraged to explore - tests exploration and secure base
2. A stranger comes in, talks to the caregiver and approaches the baby - tests stranger anxiety
3. The caregiver leaves the baby and stranger together - tests separation and stranger anxiety
4. The caregiver returns and the stranger leaves - tests reunion and exploration/ secure base behaviour
5. The caregiver leaves the baby alone - tests separation anxiety
6. The stranger returns - test stranger anxiety
7. The caregiver returns and is reunited with the baby - tests reunion behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Learning theory (behaviourist) as an explanation of attachment

A

Cupboard love - uses classical condition, baybe associates the pleasure of being fed with thier caregiver forming love
Operant conditioning - baby’s cry as their behaviour is reinforced when the mother comforts them
Attachment is a secondary drive hunger is a primary drive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Lorenz

A

Findings - the incubator group followed Lorenz everywhere and the natural group followed their mother, even when they were mixed up. This called imprinting. There is a critical period where I printing needs to take place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Sexual imprinting

A

The species you imprint on at birth is the species you will be sexually attracted to later, peacock raised around giant tournoises only wanted to then fuck giant tournoises

19
Q

Harlow procedure

A
  • about contact comfort
  • reared 16 baby monkeys with two wire monkeys as mothers, one clothed and one not
  • two conditions, milk was d’essences from the wire monkey or the cloth monkey
20
Q

Harlow findings

A

The monkeys cuddles with the cloth mother over the wire mother no matter which one dispensed milk showing contact comfort is more important than food when it comes to attachment

21
Q

Critical period for normal development Harlow

A

Found that the monkey had to be introduced within 90 days in order for attachment to form

22
Q

Maternally deprived monkeys as adults

A
  • didn’t developed normal social behaviour
  • more agressive
  • had less sex and were ‘unskilled’
  • were really shit mothers sometimes neglecting or attacking their children
23
Q

Bowlby’s monotropic theory

A
  • rejected learning theory as an explanation of attachment
  • evolutionary image system that gives survival advantages
  • emphasis and special relationship with PAF
  • the more time spent with the PAF the better
24
Q

Bowlbys social releases

A

Baby’s have innate cute behaviour ‘social releases r’ to get adults to starch to them

25
Q

Bowlbys critical period

A

Around 6 months where infants are more sensitive to attachment

26
Q

Bowlbbies internal working model

A

Infant has a representation of the relationship with thier PAF which then serves as a model for the child’s later relationships especially with thier future children

27
Q

Studies about early attachment effecting later relationships

A
28
Q

Wilson and Smith 1998

A

Not finished flash card studies abt attatcent type affecting billing

29
Q

There’s quite a few of these studies sort it out bruv but tonight I’m too tired sorry

A
30
Q

The role of fathers studies

A
31
Q

Grossman et al

A

Longitudinal studie where babies attatchment was studied until they were teens, found that the quality of attatchment with the mother was a good predictor of later relationship but the father had less effect, quality of play with father had greater effect

32
Q

Van IJzendoorn and Kroonenbrg

A

Procedure: meta analysis comparison of attachment types in 32 studies in eight countries
Findings: Found more variation of attachment type within same country than between countries

33
Q

Other curtal variations studies

A

Simonelli et al. Half secure and a third insecure–avoidant in Italy.
Jin et al. Most secure and a substantial minority insecure–resistant in Korea.
Conclusions Secure attachment the norm across a range of cultures (innate). Some variation linked to cultural practices

34
Q

Maternal deprecation

A

Prolonged separation from PAF that results in lack of emotional care

35
Q

Bowlby’s 44 thief study

A

Examined the link between affectionless psychopathy and maternal deprecation
Procedure: 44 teen thieves were interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy, then their family was also interviewed to see if the thieves went through prolonged separation control group were non criminal but emotional disturbed
Findings: 14/44 thieves were affectionless psychopaths 12/14 had experienced prolonged separation, only 5 of the other 30 thieves had experience prolonged separation, 2/44 in control group experienced prolonged separation

36
Q

Effects of prolonged separation

A

Stunted intellectual and emotional development

37
Q

Rutter at al. Procedure

A
  • followed a group of 165 Romanian orphans who had been adopted by UK families
  • a group of 52 children from the UK served as a control group
  • they were assessed for physical, cognitive and emotional development every couple of years
38
Q

Rutter et al. Finding

A

Adopted after 6 months will exhibit disinhibition attachment and lower IQ when assessed at 11 before 6 months had 102 and after 6 months had 86 on average

39
Q

Zeanah et al research

A

Assessing 95 Romanian children aged 12-31 months who had spent their lives institutionalised
- compared to a control group of 50 children who had never been institutionalised
- assessed using strange situation and cares we’re asked for songs of disinhibited attachment

40
Q

Zeanah et al finding

A

Institutionalised: 19% securely attached 44% disinhibited
Control group: 74% securely attached
>20 disinhibited

41
Q

Effects of institutionalisation

A
  • disinhibited attachment
  • intellectual disability (this can be reversed if adopted before 6 months as Ritter said)
42
Q

Disinhibited attachment

A

Being equally friendly to strangers, no stranger anxiety
Ritter explained this to adapting to living with multiple caregivers during critical period

43
Q

cultral vairations in attatchment A03

A

strengths
limmitations