Attachment-caregiver-infant reaction Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Reciprocity

Definition?

A

Responding to the action of another with assimilate action where the action of one partners elicits a response from the other partner (not necessarily similar as in intersectional synchrony)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Jaffe et al. (1973)

What did they find out between infant and caregiver?

A

Infants coordinated actions with caregiver in a kind of conversation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Brazelton (1979)

How did they link the basic conversational rhythm between infant and caregiver and later communication?

A

It is an important precursor for later communication

The infants signals and caregivers response lays the foundation for later attachment between caregiver an infant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Intersectional synchrony

Definition? 🎭

A

Interaction where there tends to be a mirroring of facial and body movements (including emotions and behaviours)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Meltzoff and Moore (1977) conducted first systematic study into I S 🎭

What did they find out
👶🏽👶🏽
Procedure?
👶🏽👦🏽… 📽

A

Infants as young as 2 to 3 weeks old imitated specific facial expressions and hand gestures

The use of an adult model using one of 3 facial expressions and hand gesture
Dummy placed intitially in infant during until display, it was then removed and Childs expression recorded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What behavioural categories were used in Meltzoff and Moore study?

A
  • mouth opening
  • Termination of mouth opening
  • tongue protrusion
  • termination of tongue protrusion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many times did judges watch tapes?

What was calculated?

A

Twice

Intra-observer and inter-observer reliability… All scores were greater than 0.92

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Later study Meltzoff and Moore (1983)
What did they find with 3 day old infants?

What did this show?

A

A similar result of their initial study with an association of infant and model behaviour

Rule out possibility that imitation behaviours are learned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Real or pseudo-imitation

Meltzoff and Moore proposed imitation is interminable

Evidence to support this view

A

Murray and Tevarthen (1985)

Two month old infant -
interacted with real mother via a video monitor in real time

Later interacted a tape of a mother not responding to infants facial and bodily gestures was played on the monitor

resulted in acute distress where infant would tried to attract attention but with no success turned away

Shows infant was actively seeking a response rather than displaying a response that was rewarded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does infant’s active and intentional partnering in a mother-infant interaction support?

A

That such behaviours are infants rather than learned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluation-
Problems with testing infant behaviour

Infants mouth are in constant motion… What does this make hard?

A

To distinguish between general activity and specific imitated behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did Meltzoff and Moore overcome the problem of general infant behaviour over specific reactions?

What did this do to internal validity?

A

Measures infant responses by filming infants then asking as observer to judge infants behaviour from the video (the judge had no idea what behaviour was being imitated)

Certainly increased internal validity of the data⬆️⬆️

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluation:

Failure to replicate findings-

Koepke et al. (1983) failed to replicate findings

What did Meltzoff and Moore counter argue?

A

Their study was less carefully controlled

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation

Marian et al. (1996) replicate Murray and Trevarrhen study and found infants couldn’t distinguish from live from videotaped interactions with their mothers

What does this suggest?

What did Marian also acknowledge of how the procedure may’ve influenced results?

A

Infants are not actually responding to the adult.

Acknowledged the problem may lie with the procedure rather than the ability of infants to imitate the caregiver.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation-

Is this behaviour intentional?

Abravenal and Deyoung (1991) observed infant behaviour when interaction with two inanimate objects (one stimulating tongue movements 👅 and the other mouth opening and closing 🗣)

What did they find?

What was concluded?

A

They found infants of a median age of 5 and 12 weeks made little response to the objects

Concluded that infants do not just imitate anything they see (it’s in fact a specific social response to humans)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly