5.7. Ethical Implications Flashcards
Socially sensitive research
Studies in which there are potential consequences or implications, either directly for the ppts in research or the class of individuals represented by the research.
What are the 4 aspects in the research process at which ethical issues with social consequences may occur?
- The research question
- Conduct of research and treatment of ppts
- The institutional context
- Interpretation and application of findings
The research question
Simply asking a question may be damaging to members of particular racial groups or sexual orientation because it appears to add scientific credibility to the prevailing prejudice.
Conduct of research and treatment of ppts
The main concern is the confidentiality of the information collected
i.e if ppts confess to a crime, should it be kept confidential
The institutional context
- Research may be funded and managed by private institutions who may misuse the data or may misunderstand the data that’s produced.
- The media may then obtain such findings and misreport them
Interpretation and application of findings
Research findings may be used for purposes other than originally intended.
- i.e. IQ tests highlight inferiority of certain groups of people and used to identify ‘feeble minded’
10 ethical issues in socially sensitive research
- Privacy
- Confidentiality
- Valid methodology
- Deception
- Informed Consent
- Equitable treatment
- Scientific freedom
- Ownership of data
- Values
- Risk/ benefit ratio
Privacy
A skilled investigator may extract more info from ppts than they intended to give, some research may lead to social policies that are an invasion of people’s private lives.
Confidentiality
Ppts may be less willing to divulge info in the future if confidentiality is breached + further related research would be compromised
Valid methodology
Scientists may be aware of these problems, but the media + public may not, therefore poor studies may shape important social policy to the detriment of those represented by research.
Deception
Includes self deception whereby research may lead to people to form untrue stereotypes which affects own performance.
Informed consent
Potential ppts may not always understand what’s involved
Equitable treatment
All ppts should be treated in an equitable manner, vital resources which are vital to a ppt should not be withheld from one group yet are available to another group
Scientific freedom
Scientists have a duty/ obligation not to harm ppts as well as institutions in society
Ownership of data
Some problems in determining ownership involve the sponsorship of the research and public accessibility
Values
- Psychologists differ in orientation towards subjective and more objective approaches
- Sensitive issues arise when there’s a clash in such values between scientists and recipient of research
Risk/benefit ratio
Risks should be minimised, but problems arise in determining risks as well as benefits
Examples
- Milgram -> had to live with fact they could have killed
- Zimbardo -> prison guards labelled as aggressive but not all were
- HM’s family could have felt uncomfortable with publication of findings but research could benefit to the individual, family and wider society
- Adorno/ Cohrs et al on authoritarian personality -> could lead to assumption about prejudice
Discussion: wider impact of research
- Always some consequences to participation in research, with socially sensitive research, there is also the increased potential for a more indirect impact on the ppt’s family, their co-workers or the group they represent
- It doesn’t seem sufficient to simply safeguard the interests of the individual in the research, there must be some consideration of the likely impact of the research on the larger group of which the ppt is a member
Discussion: The inadequacy of current ethical guidelines
- There are strict guidelines in place for psychologists, however they only deal with the immediate needs of ppts rather than the group this impacts on in the real world
Discussion: may disadvantage marginalised groups
- It could be argued that our understanding of human behaviour has been lessened by our interpretations of, or our failure to include representative samples
- This means those groups miss out on the potential benefits of the research -> opens a new ethical issue up
Discussion: should socially sensitive research be avoided?
- It might be better to leave socially sensitive research on homosexuality, race, gender and addiction, as -ve consequences may prevail, however unimportant issues would only be left
- Sieber + Stanley state that avoiding controversial topics is an avoidance of responsibility -> psychologists have a duty to conduct such research
Discussion: engaging with the public + policy makers
- To reduce misuse of data, psychologists need to be active in taking responsibility for what happens to their findings.
- They need to be aware their research might lead to abuse and discrimination
- The BPS has a press centre with aims to promote evidence based psychological research to the media. But researchers need to see it as part of the research process to promote their research in a socially sensitive way as opposed to neutral.