4.7. Management of Sz Flashcards
What are token economies?
- a form of therapy where desirable behaviours are encourages by the use of selective reinforcements
- behaviour can be shaped by the use of +ve and -ve reinforcers
Who are token economies used on?
- they’re used on those who have developed patterns of maladaptive behaviour through spending long periods of time in psychiatric hospitals -> common to develop bad hygiene habits
What do token economies do?
Improve quality of life, they are not a cure
How did token economies develop?
- Ayllon and Azrin used token economies in an sz ward
- a gift token was given for every tidying act -> later swapped for privileges e.g. films
- used extensively during 1960s and 70s but then declined in UK due to a shift towards care in the community
- token economies remain a standard approach to managing sz in many parts of world
What is the rationale for token economies?
- institutionalisation occurs in long term hospital treatment
- Matson et al identified 3 categories of institutional behaviour that can be tackled
- personal care
- condition related behaviour
- social behaviour - modifying these behaviours doesn’t cure but does have benefits
- improved quality of life
- normalises behaviour
When are token economies given?
immediately after desirable behaviour which are individually based on a person
delayed rewards are less effective
What do negative symptoms of sz lead to?
neglect of self care
token economy can be used to encourage positive behaviour using operant conditioning
What are primary reinforcers?
anything that gives pleasure and is directly rewarding
What are generalised reinforcers?
no value but can be swapped for a range of different primary reinforcers
Strength: evidence of effectiveness
+ Glowacki et al identified 7 high quality studies published between 1999 and 2013 that examined the effectiveness of token economy for people with chronic mental health issues andw involved patients living in a hospital setting.
+ All studies showed a reduction in -ve symptoms and decline in the frequency of unwanted behaviours -> supports value
- However, 7 studies is a small evidence base to support effectiveness
- Leads to file drawer problem - bias towards positive published findings because undesirable results have been filed away
Weakness: ethical issues
- gives professionals considerable power to control behaviour of people in role of patient
- involves imposing one person’s norms onto another which is problematic if target behaviours aren’t identified sensitively
- restricting availability of pleasures to people who don’t behave as desired means that seriously ill people who are already experiencing distressing symptoms have an even worse time
- families taking legal action has been a major factor in decline of token economies
- benefits may be outweighed by impact on freedom
Weakness: alternative approaches
there are more pleasant and ethical alternatives
Mathew Chiang et al:
- concluded that art therapy may be a good alternative
- has some methodological issues and a small evidence base but it is a high-gain low-risk approach
- benefits are modest but lacks risks, side effects or ethical abuses
- NICE guidelines recommend art therapy for sz