2.7. Types of attachment: The Strange Situation Flashcards

1
Q

What did Ainsworth devise the strange situation to test?

A

Nature of attachment, under a controlled observation method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Aim of the strange situation

A

To see how infants behave under stress and novelty

  • Stress created by presence of stranger and separation and of primary caregiver -> to test stranger anxiety and separation anxiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did the novel situation encourage?

A

Exploration to test secure base concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How big was the research room?

A

9x9 foot marked off via squares to record movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Procedure of strange situation

A
  • 7 episodes designed to highlight certain behaviours
  • Data collected every 15 seconds by a group of observers through a two way mirror
  • Researcher notes a behaviour and the intensity on a scale of 1-7
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the behaviours the researcher noted?

A
  • Proximity seeking behaviours
  • Exploration and secure base behaviours
  • Stranger anxiety
  • Separation anxiety
  • Reunion behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Episode 1 what happens

A

Caregiver takes infant into laboratory room and they’re left to explore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Episode 1 what it tests

A

Exploration and secure base

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Episode 2 what happens

A

Stranger enters and approaches infant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Episode 2 what it tests

A

Stranger anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Episode 3 what happens

A

The caregiver leaves unobtrusively and the stranger interacts with the infant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Episode 3 what it tests

A

Separation and stranger anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Episode 4 what happens

A

The caregiver returns and stranger leaves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Episode 4 what it tests

A

Reunion behaviour and exploration/ secure base behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Episode 5 what happens

A

The caregiver leaves so the infant is alone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Episode 5 what it tests

A

Separation anxiety

17
Q

Episode 6 what happens

A

The stranger enters and interacts with the infant

18
Q

Episode 6 what it tests

A

Stranger anxiety

19
Q

Episode 7 what happens

A

The caregiver returns and greets the infant

20
Q

Episode 7 what it tests

A

Reunion behaviour

21
Q

Type B, secure attachment findings

A
  • 66% of infants
  • Moderate proximity seeking
  • Moderate exploration but happy to return
  • Moderate stranger anxiety
  • Moderate separation anxiety
  • Easily calmed upon reunion
22
Q

Type A, insecure avoidant attachment findings

A
  • 22% of infants
  • Low proximity seeking
  • High exploration
  • Low stranger and separation anxiety
  • Ignores upon reunion
23
Q

Type c, insecure resistant attachment

A
  • 12% of infants
  • High proximity seeking
  • Low exploration
  • High separation and stranger anxiety
  • Hard to calm upon reunion
24
Q

Strength: good predictor of later development

A
  • Securely attached infants had better outcomes (academic success, more friends, better romantic relationships)
  • Resistant infants were bullied and had adult mental health problems
  • This is evidence for validity of the concept because it can predict future outcomes
  • However, it may not measure genetic differences in anxiety.
25
Q

Strength: inter-rater reliability

A
  • Inter-rater reliability used on ratings used on ratings were compared by a panel of experienced judges
  • Behaviour categories were clearly defined, therefore more reliable
  • Ainsworth found an almost perfect agreement when rating exploratory behaviour - 0.94 agreement
26
Q

Weakness: Culture bias

A
  • Might not have the same meaning in countries outside of Western Europe and the USA where it was created.
  • Cultural diffs in children’s experiences mean they respond differently e.g. Japanese babies show anxiety because they aren’t used to being left by their caregiver
  • This means it’s difficult to know what the strange situation is measuring in some countries/ cultures
27
Q

Weakness: 4th attachment type

A

A reanalysis of over 200 strange situation videotapes led Main and Solomon to propose a 4th attachment type:

Disorganised attachment:
- A lack of consistent pattens of social behaviour
- Lack coherent strategy for dealing with stress of separation
- An odd mix of avoidant and resistant