2.10. Institutionalisation Flashcards

1
Q

What was happening in Romania in the 90s?

A
  • Former President forbade women under 40 with less than 4 children to use contraception or have an abortion.
  • Many people couldn’t afford to keep their children and they ended up in huge orphanages or in very poor conditions
  • After 1989 revolution, many of children were adopted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rutter: English and Romanian Adoptees procedure

A
  • Group of 165 Romanian orphans adopted in Britain - wanted to test to what extent good care could make up for poor early experience in institutions
  • Some adopted before 6 months, others all adopted before 4.
  • Physical, cognitive and emotional development assessed at 4, 6, 11 and 15 yrs.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Findings of Rutter’s study

A
  • Upon arrival in UK, half of adoptees showed signs of mental retardation and the majority were severely undernourished.
  • At age 11, the mean IQ for orphans adopted before 6 months was 102 compared with 86 for those adopted between 6 months and 2 yrs and 77 for those adopted after 2 yrs. These diffs were still there at age 16.
  • Children adopted after 6 months showed signs of disinhibited attachment whereas those children adopted before 6 months rarely did.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Conclusions of Rutter’s study

A
  • The findings support Bowlby’s view that there is a sensitive period in the development of attachments and a failure to form an attachment before the age of 6 months and after 2 yrs appears to have long lasting effects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Zeanah et al procedure:

A
  • 95 children ages 12-31 months who had spent most of their time in institutional care.
  • Compared to a control group of 50 children that had never been institutionalised.
  • Attachment type was measured using the strange situation and carers were asked about unusual social behaviours.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Zeanah et al findings:

A
  • 74% of the control were securely attached
  • 19% of institutionalised group were securely attached
  • 65% of the institutionalised group had disorganised attachment
  • 44% of institutionalised group had disinhibited attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is physical underdevelopment?

A

Gardner found that lack of emotional care leads to deprivation dwarfism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is damage to intellectual development?

A
  • Cognitive development is affected by emotional deprivation
  • Can be reversed if adopted before 6 months
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is disinhibited attachment?

A

A form of insecure attachment, a child will treat a stranger with inappropriate familiarity and may be attention seeking.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is poor parenting?

A

Quinton compared a group of 50 women brought up in institutions with a control group.
When in their 20s, women reared in institutions experience extreme difficulties acting as their parents; their children went on to spend time in care.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Strength: RWA

A
  • Most babies are now adopted in the first couple of weeks of birth as research shows children and adoptive mothers as just as securely attached as non-adoptive families.
  • It has helped children’s homes, making sure caregiver to child ratio is a lot smaller, and assigning a key worker to enable normal attachments to develop
  • Means that children in institutional care have a chance to develop normal attachments and disinhibited attachment is avoided
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Strength: fewer confounding variables than other

A
  • There were many orphan studies before the Romanian orphans became available to study
  • Neglect, abuse and bereavement made it hard to observe the effects of institutionalisation
  • The children were affected by these confounding variables- Rutter’s study has fewer confounding variables.
  • Means we can be fairly sure that diffs in institutionally cared for children are the rest of this type of care.
  • However, Romanian orphan studies may have new confounding variables because quality of care was so poor, making it hard to separate effects of institutional care from the of poor institutional care
  • This means the internal validity might not be better than in previous studies after all.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Weakness: lack of data on adult development

A
  • It’s too soon to say for certain whether children suffered permanent effects because we only have data on their development up to their early 20s.
  • Due to when this took place, it will be some time before we have information about some key research questions
  • This means the Romanian orphan studies have not yet yielded their most important findings, some children may catch up.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation extra- social sensitivity

A
  • Late adopted children were shown to have low IQ- this might subsequently affect how they’re treated by parents, teachers etc and might create a self fulfilling prophecy.
  • On the other hand, much has been learned from the Romanian orphan studies that might benefit future institutionalised or potentially institutionalised children.
  • So potential benefits of the studies probably outweigh the social sensitivity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly