5- fundamentals of single case experimental design l Flashcards

1
Q
  • Small number of subjects
  • multiple, repeated observations
  • When independent variable is introduced, changes in the independent variable are made once the dependent variable has reached a steady state
A

Single case designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The variable in an experiment measured to determine if it changes as a result of manipulations of the independent variable. In ABA, it represents some measure of socially significant behavior.

The variable that is systematically manipulated by the researcher in an experiment to see whether changes in the independent variable produce reliable changes in the dependent variable. In ABA, it is usually an environmental event or condition antecedent or consequent to the dependent variable.

A

Dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

IV introduction:

Changes in the IV assigned according to randomize and match designs.

Method of data analysis: Usually inferential statistics

Exposure to the treatment:
Each individual often exposed to only one level of the IV….That is, either baseline OR treatment

Comparison is made between groups of individuals
Control group versus experimental group.

Large numbers of subjects.

Few, often single observations

A

Group design:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  • Permit investigation of behavior change as a dynamic process
  • Repeated measurements and stability criteria mean that you need to keep observing
    • Permits you to see patterns of behavior change
    • Taking single measurements obscures that process
A

Single case design advantages: dynamic change. …Relative to group designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Allows examination of interest subject variability

Group Design may not reveal anything about the performance of any given individual
eg, and increased group score might reflect great improvement for a small number of subjects, while the majority did not change or performance decreased

Allows the examination of intra- subject variability

Difficult to detect sources of within subject variability with group data

Better for exploration of idiosyncratic affects and serendipitous findings because the data path is not constrained by hypothesis testing

A

Single group design Advantages : Variability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The goal is to demonstrate a functional relation between the independent and dependent variables

  • Functional relation: when A, and only A, causes B
    - Determined/demonstrated through systematic manipulation

The repeated and systematic presentation and removal of an independent variable E.g.,The intervention while measuring the dependent variable(s) (Target bx) , and holding other factors constant

There is no distinction in systematic manipulation used for treatment of evaluation for experimental design

A

Experimental design in ABA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

provides information about existing extent of the problem.

Serves as an indication of whether the intervention is necessary.

A

Baseline function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Movement from one kind of independent variable to another kind of independent variable describes what?

gather baseline data for three sessions
Need at least three to start a trend.
Regardless of length, consider the last three points as a small trend.

A qualitative research for determining if the trend is sufficiently stable

Example: no more than 25% deviation in last three points. No trend in any direction in last three points.

Particularly important in research

When in doubt, Run it out

A

Phase change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

You are making tremendous progress with a research project when suddenly the behavior dramatically changes. After interviews you were informed that the subjects parents divorced. What is the probable threat to internal validity?

A

History

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

I am going to do a withdrawal design with a four-year-old who receives frequent praise for appropriate replacement behaviors. During the with drawl face his mother continues to give him praise occasionally.

A

Diffusion of treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

I am running a long-term study on the effects of a language acquisition program. I work with children from the time they are one and a half until they are four years old. All of my participants increase their language.

A

Maturation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

I am doing a study with group home staff on increasing performance. One week into my study the group home manager quits.

A

History

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

I am examining the effects of a new teaching program on receptive identification. Aside from my intervention, one of my participants is also receiving outside therapy on identified picture cards.

A

History

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

I am doing a study on reducing tantrum behavior, and I still have interobserver agreement of 50%.

A

Instrumentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Based on the data above what is your conclusion about the response class program?

A

It has a reductive effect on tantrums

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Assessment of the dependent variable prior to the introduction or change of the independent variable

Does not necessarily imply the absence of treatment

State of events before you made any changes

A

Baseline logic BL Definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Baseline ohase A: independent variable is absent

Intervention phase B: independent variable is introduced and remains present

Baseline data are first collected on two separate behaviors, versus withdrawal, and what you think of behavior is tracked.

Next, treatment one is applied to behavior one; at the same time, treatment to his apply to behavior to.

Treatment 2 is usually the reversal I have treatment one, but can be a no treatment a.k.a. BL condition

Return to baseline A: independent variable is withdrawn

If behavior changes systematically as a function of the introduction and withdrawl of the independent variable,

The likelihood is small that some extraneous variable produced the behavior change.

    This likelihood decreases with each subsequent withdraw an introduction of independent variable

 Prediction, verification, and replication

instead of simply withdrawing treatment one from behavior 1 In the next phase, the treatments on the two behaviors are reversed. Behavior one receives treatment to, and behavior to now receives treatment one.

In the final phase, the interventions are once again reversed: behavior number one again receives treatment number one, and behavior two goes back to receiving treatment two

Essentially this is two concurrent but out of phase with drawl designs, imposed on two behaviors, which are possibly functionally related.

A

Reversal designs: ABA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Reversibility – some behavior changes are not reversible:

Intervention produces effects that are impossible to withdraw e.g., skills acquisition

Behavior after initial change, makes contact with other variables that make reversal unlikely even intervention is withdrawn
E.g., contrived reinforcement to support Social initiations – initiations get support by the response of others

The ethics of intervention reversal
In cases, it may be an ethical to reverse treatment
You’re going to do what now with my child?
Balancing reversal ethics with the right to effective treatment
It may be unethical not to show a functional relation

Which phase first- does the analysis always start with the absence of the independent variable?
If intervention is immediately critical, Analysis may begin with an intervention phase
Beginning with intervention does not alter the logic of the design

Most straightforward single case arrangement

Most powerful demonstration of functional relationships

A

Reverse limitations : Irreversibility

Ethics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

This distinction was originally going to be made by the fourth edition task list, but since it is no longer commonly used either in practice of literature, the distinction is no longer required by the board

A

Withdrawal versus Reversal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Baseline is followed by a treatment condition. The intervention used in the treatment condition is then withdrawn and returned to baseline.

Baseline, BL, and a treatment I, Tx, or alternated,
A-B-A design

Often ends in treatment: A B A B

A

Withdrawal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Three standard variations of multiple baseline data

A

Multiple baseline across

subjects
behaviors
settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When two or more base lines are established, followed by the staggered introduction of the independent variable to each baseline, this procedure describes which experimental designs.?

Inappropriate when the behaviors are interdependent

   Changing behaviors and one baseline is likely to change behaviors and the other baselines even before the independent variable is presented

Intermittent measures, or probes are taken rather than continue with measurement on each baseline
Procedurally
Two or more independent baselines Are established.
The independent variable is then separately introduced in a staggered fashion to each
When baseline is stable for the first baseline, the independent variable is introduced on the second baseline and so on (design logic)
Experimental control is demonstrated by showing that behavior changes when, and only when, the independent variable is introduced to each baseline

The possibility of extraneous variables causing the change is highly unlikely under the circumstances

Usually dictated by the stability, level, and trend of the first baseline
Same rules apply, as long as necessary, as short as possible
Often first baseline is continuous, but subsequent baseline data collection is conducted on an intermittent basis relative to the first base

How many baselines? The larger the number, the more convincing. Lanes both internal and extra no validity

Using only two base lines in a multiple baseline design can be a risk.
If one does not change, the conclusions are questionable, essentially an AB design
If 3+ our use and one does not change, still a reasonable demonstration of experimental control, the failure is the likely outlier

A

Multiple baseline design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

One of the disadvantages of the multiple baseline design is that the experimenter cannot test Methods and interventions before applying them on a larger scale. True or false

A

False

24
Q

A.k.a. delayed multiple baseline

Separate baselines are taken

The baselines are staggered in terms of the number of data points in the same way

But the baselines are not conducted at the same time

Advantage
Permits greater flexibility in the analysis – not constrained by having to have all subjects concurrently present

Limitations

Analysis need not be completed concurrently because the chances that the same extraneous variable, rather than that IV reduced the same result is even more remote if the baselines are separated by time

A

Non-concurrent multiple baseline. Design

25
Q

Which is not an advantage of the multiple prop technique.

A. Less time effort to implemen

B. Avoid threats stemming from repeated exposure such as extended practice

C reduces likelihood of variability

A

C

26
Q
  1. Involves:

Repeated, systematic presentation and removal of an independent variable
Changes in environmental events, interventions
While measuring changes in the dependent variable:
Some aspect of the behavior of interest
And holding other factors constant

  1. Goals:
    to demonstrate functional relation between the independent variable and the dependent variable
        Evaluate the interventions once they are decided upon
A
  1. Experimental design.

2. Experimental design: goals

27
Q

In ABA there is no distinction between:

Systematic manipulation used to evaluate The effects of a treatment
AND
Systematic manipulation used to answer a Research question

A

Experimental design: research and practice

28
Q

When changes in an antecedent or consequent stimulus class consistently alter a dimension of a response class

Hence, A functional analysis -
Quantitative direct observation of behavior under systematically manipulated and controlled conditions;
-NOT Just a method of assessing problem behavior

A

Functional relation

29
Q

Quantitative direct observation of behavior under systematically manipulated and controlled conditions; not just a method of assessing problem behavior

A

Functional analysis

30
Q

The extent to which an analysis assures us that measured changes in behavior Are due to the manipulation and not due to uncontrolled extraneous variables

Primacy of Internal Validity

Regarded as a PRIORITY over external validity

It makes little sense to consider the generality of the effect If EXTRANEOUS VARIABLES cannot be rolled out for the effect

A

Internal validity

31
Q

The extent to which a study’s results are generalizable to other subjects, settings, or behaviors

A

External validity

32
Q

History
introduction of the independent variable may coincide with other events in the persons life.
Those other events could have produced those effects

Maturation
Testing
Instrumentation
Diffusion 
Threat regression
Selection bias
Attrition
A

Internal validity threats

33
Q

Inadvertent, uncontrolled seepage of the treatment to control conditions or control subjects

E.g., parent gets child to practice new skills before the intervention is formally introduced

A

Diffusion threat

34
Q

Changes occurred before baseline measurements were not representative of the natural state of events. E.g., unusual events took place on the initial day of testing which were not in place after intervention, so it looks like the intervention was effective.

Perhaps less relevant to single case designs because of repeated measurement

A

Regression: internal validity threat

35
Q

Changes in the dependent variable may have come about as a function of repeated exposure to the experimental arrangements e.g., practice effects– accuracy on task occurs as a function of repeated exposure to the task before the IV is introduced

A

Testing: internal validity threat

36
Q

Changes may reflect modifications in the measurement systems rather than effects of the independent variable

E.g., Subjective judgment of human observers, poor integrity of treatment delivery, damaged or no equipment, poor calibration of measurement devices

A

Instrumentation: internal validity threat

37
Q

Introduction of the independent variable may coincide with other events in the persons life. Those other events could have produced via fax. E.g., psychiatrist introduce his medication change just as you introduce the behavioral intervention

A

History: internal validity threat

38
Q

Natural developmental events or learning experiences may coincide with the introduction of the independent variable to produce the change. E.g., growing older, stronger, healthier, etc.

A

Maturation right

39
Q

The assignment of subjects to groups may have biased the outcome even in the absence of any intervention

E.g., self selection bias – participants who for various reasons are more prone to show greater improvement may also be more likely to participate in a study

Perhaps less relevant to SCD because participants serve as your own controls. All controls or individual is exposed to both BL and intervention

A

Selection bias: internal validity threat

40
Q

The loss of subjects over time, especially if systematic, May influence the effects

E.g., subjects that tender towards the extreme ends of the measure may leave selectively. Thereby skewing the sample at post test

Perhaps less relevant to SCD because participate serve as their own controls

A

Attrition : internal validity threat

41
Q

Continuous assessment – collecting data on the dependent measure for an extended period of time
In contrast to very small samples of the dependent variable

 Helps to rule out that changes came about as a function of factors that could have all day performance overtime e.g., testing regression maturation
A

Measurement: minimizing validity threats

42
Q

Stabley seeing stability of the target behavior
If levels of the dependent variable remains relatively stable over time before the independent variable is introduce… The likelihood that the change can be attributed to the independent variable increases

A

Minimizing validity threats:

STABILITY

43
Q

Immediate effects of the independent variable

The more immediate affects the stronger the case that the IV produced it

 Slow effects that appears long after the introduction of the IV call into question whether the change was imminent despite the intervention i.e., intervening events may have caused the change
A

Immediacy: minimizing validity threats

44
Q

Demonstration using multiple cases

if the IV affects many subjects in the same manner
A stronger case can be made that it produced the change

A

Replication: minimizing validity threats

45
Q

Used for setting target outcomes, e.g., reduction or increase relative to baseline

Sometimes shows that intervention is not needed or maybe unlikely to produce gains

A

Setting targets: baseline function

46
Q

Assessment of the dependent variable prior to the introduction or change of the independent variable

Does not necessarily imply the absence of treatment

The longer the baseline the grade of the predictive power

Nothing is gained by unduly long baselines

As long as necessary as short as possible. Generally less should be dictated by qualitative features of the data path… Phase change logic

Movement in the analysis from one level or kind of independent variable to the next level kind of independent variable

Phase changes move the analysis towards an AB design

Predictive
Predict the future level of the target behavior in the absence of the IV or if the IV has no effect

Serves as a criterion to evaluate whether the intervention produces change

Other purposes/benefits of baseline data:

Sometimes simply observing during baseline provides insight into relevant environmental events that can promote treatment development.

E.g., baseline sessions conducted a crossed the day but you notice problem behavior is more likely during morning rather than afternoon baseline sessions

A

Baseline logic

47
Q
  1. Measurement (attrition, continuous assessment, testing, regression, maturation)

2, Stability

  1. Replication
  2. Immediacy – immediacy of independent variable
A

Minimizing validity threats

48
Q

Extent to which the experiment shows the changes in the behavior are due to the independent variable and not the result of uncontrolled or confounding variables

Examples of confounding variables:

  • Starting medication
  • Change in home life (divorce, death, new baby, move, etc)
  • Change in school/therapy life (new therapists, clinicians, new building, new school, etc
A

Internal Validity

49
Q

The degree to which a study’s findings have generality to other subjects, settings, and/or behaviors

-Will this study prove effective if a different population of participants is used?
-Will this study be effective if used with a different type of behaviors?
If the study was done in a clinic, will it be effective if conducted in a school classroom setting? What about in a home environment?

A

External Validity

50
Q

In non-concurrent multiple baselines, the baselines are staggered by…..

A

The number of data points in the same way

51
Q

Analysis need not be completed concurrently because the chances that the same extraneous variable, rather than that IV reduced the same result is even more remote if the baselines are separated by time

A

Non concurrent Multiple Baseline

52
Q

Use of this is inappropriate when the behaviors are interdependent

A

Multiple baseline

53
Q

Changing behaviors in one baseline is likely to change behaviors and the other baselines even before the independent variable is presented

A

Multiple baseline

54
Q

Most powerful demonstration of functional relationships

A

Reversal design, A – B – A

55
Q

• Method of data analysis:

  • Visual data analysis.
  • sometimes statistical analysis
  • Repeated and systematic presentation and removal of a treatment and measurement of behavior while holding other factors constant
  • In ABA, valid experimental design and rigorous treatment evaluation are synonymous.
  • A variety of designs that use baseline logic to demonstrate the effects of independent variables on the behavior of individual subjects
  • !Comparison is made within individuals
  • Lends itself to clinical investigation and treatment accountability because participants serve as their own controls.
A

Single case design

56
Q

Exposure to the treatment:

Each individual exposed to each level of the IV.
Both baseline AND treatment

Both cases the objective is the same:

To make valid inferences about the effect of an independent variable while, ruling out other possible sources of variability between the experimental condition and the control condition

• Represents the performance of an individual subject
-The one that needs help

A

Single case design