4.1.1 - Resistance To Social Norms Flashcards
Who studies locus of control
Rotter
What is a locus of control
A persons perception of personal control over their own behaviour, it bias a personality explanation of behaviour( dispositional)
- it is measures on a scale of high internal to high external
Characteristics of an internal locus of control
- high level of personal control over their own lives and behaviour
- takes personal responsibility for their achievements/ mistakes
Characteristics of an external locus of control
- life is determined by external or environmental factors such as luck or fate
Internal locus of controls - relation to social influence
- high internals actively seek out info which will help them personally
- they are less likely to rely on others
- they are achievement orientated
- are able to resist pressure from others
External locus of controls - relation to social influence
- high externals are more likely to be influenced by others
- as they dont believe they excersise personal control over their own lives
- so the order was “meant to be” for them
What is social support
When presence of someone else not conforming/obeying makes it easier for others to also not obey/ conform
How does social support effect conformity
- social support can help individuals resist conformity
-> Asch research : the confederate that doesn’t conform with the rest of the group didn’t have to provide the correct answer for others to also not conform- all that was needed was a relief of social pressure
How does social support effect obedience
- the pressure to obey can be reduced if another person is also seen to disobey
-> milgrams variations : obedience dropped from 65% to 10% when the ppts were joined by a disobedient confederate
LOC A03 - exaggeration of the LOC
- Rotter found that LOC is only important in new situations so cannot be applied to familiar situations as prior experiences may be more important
- LOC can only explain a limited range of situations
- less generalisable to everyday life
Evaluation LOC - research support
Holland(1967)
- repeated milgrams study and measured whether people were internals or externals
- 37% of internals didn’t continue to the highest shock level
- 23% of externals didn’t continue
- supports claim that externals are more likely to obey
- increases external validity of LOC
Social support A03 - Allen and Levine
- supports social supports effect on conformity
- carried out an Asch type study and found that independence increased is a dissenter was present
- when the dissenter has thick glasses and complained about bad eyesight, independence still increased
- shows that resistance is motivated by a relief of pressure rather than following what others say
Social support A03 - Gamson et al
- supported social supports effects on obedience
- ppts were in **groups* had to produce evidence to help an oil company run a ‘smear campaign’
- 88% of groups rebelled which is much higher than only 35% in Milgrams study
- shows that peer support ca be linked to greater resistance to obedience/ authority