329 Biodiversity Final Flashcards
Purple Martin Foundation mission statement
- restore and conserve Western Purple Martin populations along W Coast of NA
- return BC Purple Martins to natural nesting sites in open forest and near freshwater habitats
- eliminate need for human intervention for survival in BC
What do Purple Martins eat
Insects! fly up to high altitudes to catch large flying insects such as dragonflies, moths, beetles, & smaller insects. Dragonflies especially good for hungry nestlings
nootropic migration
A bird that spends the summer in its breeding range in Canada or the United States (the nearctic) but migrates to Mexico, Central America, South America or the Caribbean (the New World or neo-tropics) for its nonbreeding range in winter
Western Purple Martin northern limit of breeding range
north end of Georgia Basin, near Campbell River, VI
PM timing of migration
Adults arrive in BC early-mid April
Younger subadult birds arrive later in May and June
largest BC PM colony
Ladysmith Maritime Society marina in Ladysmith Harbour (67 nests, 2008)
PM colonies
mostly 5-30 nesting pairs in artificial housing and less than 10 pairs where they still occur in the wild in the western USA.
Where do PM’s build colonies
cavities, traditionally woodpecker holes close to water
now, mainly human provided nest boxes- clustered together on marine pilings near/on water
Eastern vs. Western PM nesting
Eastern prefer condo-style or hanging gourds
W prefer individual boxes in loose clusters
How PM’s are being tracked (“new”)
miniature light-level geolocator data loggers recently developed by the British Antarctic Survey (www.birdtracker.co.uk)
how do miniature light-level geolocator data loggers work
record time and light intensity every 10 minutes, allows determination of bird’s position from day length and sunrise/ sunset times
precision of miniature light-level geolocator data loggers
(+/- ~300 km)
battery expectancy >1.5yrs
the PM study
put locators on 20 adults on Central VI, July-Aug 2009
worn until they returned in spring 2010
how are geolocators attached
attached with a tiny “backpack” harness around the legs, a design which neither harms the bird nor interferes with its movements
PM study, year 2
only recovered 1 locator
find migration = ~22,000 km long
applied 10 more locators
PM study, year 3
retrieved 4 locators
added 20 more locators
PM conservation goals
- sustain current highly successful volunteer nest-box-based recovery program
- increase abundance to min 800 nesting pairs by 2012
- re-introduce sig. proportion of population to original/equivalent nesting cavity situations in wild
- redevelop a sustainable wild-nesting population (as far as practical)
BC PM nest box program
1985- installation of nest boxes at Cowichan Bay, probably rescued from extirpation
increased slowly, nest boxes installed at more suitable marine locations
1989- 14 nesting pairs located at 3 nest box sites and 1 piling location on S VI
-2000 ~200 pairs at 16 colonies.
BC PM nest box program, 2000’s
2002- Georgia Basin Ecological Assessment and Restoration Society (GBEARS) takes over and renames “BC Purple Martin Stewardship and Recovery Program”
2005-06, freshwater sites added
PM volunteers
now 145+ volunteers
First Nations, individuals, naturalist/conservation groups, corporations, federal, provincial, regional/municipal government departments, and universities
PM recovery and weather
warm = insects = success– 2006, population tripled
cold wet = less insects = population slows or declines
2008- worst conditions, long cold spring, week of rain at end of July, lack of food = loss of ~100 adults and ~40% of nestlings, subsequent decline in breeding pairs the next year
moving PM’s back to natural sites
Two freshwater sites were occupied in the Fraser Valley area for the first time in almost 40 years – one each in 2006 and 2007. There are currently 1500 nest boxes distributed among 70 marine and 20 freshwater locations.
reasons for bird surveys
simply wanting to know # of species
baseline information for poorly known species/area
land development assessment designation (legal protection)
set priorities to focus conservation efforts
determine habitat associations
why monitor
estimate population trends over time
set conservation priorities
research tool
early pointers for underlying causes of trends
underlying demographic mechanisms
determining success of conservation actions
conservation actions
acquisition of land to protect species
adoption of new management practices
species recovery programs
government environment policies
very important for monitoring
consistency of method is crucial
most common deforestation causes
agriculture, unsustainable forest management, mining, infrastructure projects, increased fire incidence/intensity
indirect effects on deforestation
road building, opening up passages, ‘death by a thousand cuts’
deforestation, Conversion of forests
removing natural forests to meet other land needs, such as pulp/palm/soy plantations, agriculture, pasture for cattle settlements and mining, settlements, roads and infrastructure
deforestation, Forest fires
millions of ha/yr
worse where fires have been suppressed for years (unnatural accumulation makes fire burn more intensely)
deforestation, Illegal and unsustainable logging
occurs in all types of forests across all continents
Illegally harvested wood finds its way into major consumption markets– depresses world timber prices by between 7% and 16%
deforestation, Fuelwood harvesting
Over-harvesting for domestic use or for commercial trade in charcoal significantly damages forests.
deforestation, Mining
often accompanied by major infrastructure construction, such as roads, railway lines and power stations, putting further pressure on forests and freshwater ecosystems
deforestation, climate change
Forest loss is both cause and effect of CC
agriculture, forestry, land-use ~1/4 GHG emissions
leading cause of deforestation
agriculture: oil palm, soy, rubber, coffee, tea, and rice among many other crops – also leads to soil erosion
population index
suitable for determining changes in population size, not exact size - directly related to the unknown population size (ex. if pop. 2X so does index), easier to obtain than pop. size
population size
if you need to know the exact size than a count is needed, not an index, more labour/resource intensive, and never completely accurate either. a good index is preferable over a poor count
true census
attempting to count all birds, pairs, or nests within survey boundary
rare, restricted range bird count
often best to do a true census, sampling might record too few birds for a reliable estimate
high clumped/conspicuous birds
count most of population at limited number of sites