2.3 relationships and processes within schools Flashcards
1
Q
Hargreaves and Willis’ study
A
- subcultures can be pro-school or anti-school
- members have things in common, gain status, mutual support and a sense of belonging
- anti-school subcultures are predominantly found in bottom sets
2
Q
Louise Archer = University’s not for me, ‘I’m a Nike person’
A
- mixed methods(longitudinal interviews and group interviews)
- working class’ culture isn’t represented, they suffer symbolic violence
3
Q
Louise Archer = Pupil Identities (2008)
A
- ideal pupil = white, middle class, highly achieving
- pathologised pupil = Asian, lower class but deserving poor, conformists
- demonised pupil = black or white working class, seen as unintelligent, peer-led
4
Q
Peter Woods
A
- not just pro or anti, it is a wide variety
5
Q
What are the 8 sub-cultures that Woods identified?
A
- ingratiation = eager to please teachers
- compliance = rather neutral
- opportunism = try to please teachers and win popularity
- ritualism = not overly enthusiastic
- retreatism = dont seek academic success
- colonisation = hostile towards school
- intransigence
- rebellion
6
Q
Mirza (1992)
A
- 62 black girls, found that they had very +ve attitudes to school
- although many thought that some teachers were racist, they still valued their education
7
Q
Martin Mac an Ghail (1994) = a study of the relationship between schooling, class, masculinity and sexuality
A
- macho lads = hostile to school authority
- academic achievers = called effeminate and ridiculed
- new enterprisers = accepted new enterprise linked vocational subjects
- Real Englishmen = reject authority BUT achieve success by appearing not to care
- gay students = feel neglected
8
Q
Hollingworth and Williams:
A
- now a greater variation in middle class subcultures based on consumption e.g. skaters, emos, goths, hippies and poshies
9
Q
What is meant by labelling theory?
A
- labelling by teachers can contribute to the moulding of student identities and has been proven to effect educational performance and behaviour
- it can affect a child’s self-concept
10
Q
What is the halo effect?
A
- students are either labelled with a halo or an unfavourable halo
11
Q
Rosenthal and Jacobson (1968) = Pygmallion in the Classroom
A
- field experiment
- sample of 20% and told the teachers that those students could be expected to achieve rapid development
- the teachers passed on their high expectations which led to a self-fulfilling prophecy
12
Q
Howard Becker
A
- semi-structures interviews, 60 teachers asking what their ideal pupil would be
- upper-middle class pupil best fit the description
13
Q
Harvey and Slatin (1976) = Social Class Laboratory Experiment
A
- 96 teachers shown 18 photos
- teachers were then asked to rate children on their performance, parental attitudes to education, aspirations and so on
- the results have shown that lower class students were rated less favourably
14
Q
Rist = Cardinals, Tigers and Clowns
A
- appearance can influence teacher labelling
- there were three tables:
1. tigers = smart and engaged
2. cardinals = appearance as expected
3. clowns = scruffy and disengaged
15
Q
Gillborn and Youdell (2000)
A
- teachers had ‘racialised expectations which resulted in black students being negatively labelled as a threat
- black boys are more likely to be excluded or put in bottom set