1.4 Minority Influence Flashcards
What is minority influence?
A form of social influence in which a majority of people persuade others to adopt their beliefs, attitudes or behaviours
What does minority influence lead to and why?
- Internalisation
- Both public behaviour and private beliefs are changed by the process
What 3 factors influence the effectiveness of minority influence?
- Consistency
- Commitment
- Flexibility
What is consistency?
The minority keeps the same beliefs both over time and between all the individuals that form the minority
What are the 2 types of consistency?
- Synchronic consistency: all saying the same thing
- Diachronic consistency: saying the same thing for a long period
What is commitment?
The minority engages in extreme activities to demonstrate dedication to their views e.g making personal sacrifices
What is the augmentation principle?
Engaging in extreme activities present a risk and show a greater commitment. Majority group then pay even more attention
What is flexibility?
When a minority is prepared to adapt their point of view and accept reasonable and valid counterarguments
What did Nemeth (1986) argue about minority influence?
Consistency is not the only important factor as it can be off-putting. Extreme consistency may be seen as rigid, dogmatic and unbending
What is the snowball effect?
Over time, more people switch from the minority to the majority view. Gradually the minority view becomes the majority and change has occurred
How does deeper processing effect minority influence?
Hearing something you already agree with doesn’t make you stop and think but hearing something new will make you think more deeply about it
Describe the Moscovici (1969) ‘The blue-green slides’ study
- Group of 6 asked to view a set 36 blue coloured slides that varied in intensity
- Participants tasked to state whether slides were blue or green
- In each group were 2 confederates who consistently said slides were green
- In another group, confederates said green 24 times and blue 12 times (inconsistent minority)
- In control group, there were no confederates and participants had to identify colour of slides
Describe the findings of the Moscovici (1969) ‘The blue-green slides’ study
- The participants gave the same wrong answer (green) on 8.42% of the trials
- In inconsistent minority group, agreement with answer green fell to 1.25%
- In control group, they answered wrong on just 0.25% of trials
AO3 for minority influence
1. Research support for consistency: Moscovici’s study showed consistent minority opinion had greater effect on changing views than inconsistent, Woody et al (1994) meta-analysis of 100 studies, found more consistent minorities were more influential
2. Research support for deeper processing: Martin et al (2003) presented a message and measured participants agreement, one group heard a minority agree with the statement and other group heard a majority, participants exposed to conflicting view and attitudes measured again, people less willing to change opinions if listened to minority than majority, minority message had been more deeply processed
Counterargument: made clear distinction between minority and majority, real life situations more complicated, minorities are very committed to their cause, these features absent from research
3. Artifical tasks: research far removed from how minorities attempt to change views of majorities, in come cases e.g jury decision-making the outcomes are majorly important, findings lack external validity, limited information about minority influence in real life
What is social influence?
The process by which individuals and groups change each others attitudes and behaviours