week 7 Flashcards

1
Q

What is cognitive dissonance

A

the mental discomfort that results from holding two conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

with cognitive dissonance, two belief are

A

dissonant when one is opposite to
the other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dissonance reduction strategies:

A
  1. Remove the dissonant belief.
  2. Reduce the importance of the
    dissonant belief.
  3. Add a new consonant belief.
  4. Increase the importance of
    the consonant belief.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

4 Dissonance arousing situation

A

choice, insufficient justification, effort justification( extreme behaviours breed extreme beliefs), new information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Motivation to exercise personal control is predicted by two things

A

efficacy expectations and outcome expectations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the two types of expectations?

A

Efficacy expectation: expecting to be able to perform the behaviours required to cope effectively with the situations

outcome expectation: expect positive outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Model of perceived control

A

self (agent)-efficacy expectation-> action (means)-outcome expectations-> control (ends)-perceived control-> cycle starts again

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Perceived control refers to

A

Pre-performance, in-performance, and postperformance expectancies regarding the
extent to which one possesses the capacity
needed to attain desired outcomes and to
prevent undesired outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Percieved control: beliefs and expectations the person holds that they can interact with the environment in ways that produce

A

desired outcomes and
prevent undesired outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Self-efficacy is defined as

A

as one’s
judgment of how well (or poorly)
one will cope with a situation,
given the skills one possesses and
the circumstances one faces.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

the opposite of efficacy is

A

doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sources of self reliance: personal behaviour history

A

believing they can complete a course of action stems from their course of actions in the past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Sources of self-efficacy: vicarious experience

A

watching someone do what your attempt to do

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sources of self efficacy: verbal persuasion

A

When effective, pep
talks persuade the
performer to focus
more on personal
strengths and less on
personal weaknesses
and deficiencies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

pygmalion effect

A

others imposed expectations become internalized by imposee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

sources of self-efficacy: physiological state

A

Expecting to fail brings certain physiological states: pounding heart, feeling flushed

17
Q

Effects of self-efficacy

A
  1. Choice (Approach vs. Avoid)
  2. Effort and Persistence
  3. Thinking and Decision Making
  4. Emotion Reactions (Stress, Anxiety)
18
Q

what is learned helplessness

A
  • Psychological state that results when an
    individual perceives that events and
    outcomes in the environment are
    uncontrollable.
19
Q

What are explanatory styles?

A

Relatively stable cognitively-based personality variable that reflects the habitual
way that people explain the reasons why bad events happen to them.

20
Q

two styles:

A

optimistic explanatory style

pessimistic explanatory style

21
Q

optimistic explanatory styles:

A

Tendency to explain bad events with attributions that are unstable and
controllable

22
Q

pessimistic explanatory styles

A

Tendency to explain bad events with attributions that are stable and
uncontrollable

23
Q

learned helplessness effects : 3 deficits

A

motivational deficit ( decreased willingness to try)

learning deficit (Acquired pessimistic
mindset that
interferes with one’s
ability to learn new
response-outcome
contingencies)

emotional deficits (energy-depleating emotions)

24
Q

reactance theory

A

The psychological and behavioural
attempt at reestablishing (“reacting”
against) an eliminated or threatened
freedom.

25
Q

reactance theory: 4 things

A
  1. both reactance and helplessness arise from outcome expectancies
  2. resistance is rooted in perceived control, helpless starts from absence
  3. a reactance response precedes a helplessness response
  4. reactance enhances performance, whereas helplessness undermines it
26
Q

Expectancy-value model: value is defined as

A

e is defined as the perceived attractiveness of a task.

27
Q

value hs 4 components:

A

interest value (task enjoyment)

utility value (usefulness to ones goal)

attainment value (importance to the self)

costs (psychological barriers)

28
Q

Value intervention study: examined what

A

pParticipants are asked to discover the personal relevance of the course material

29
Q

IV vs DV

A

IV: value boost and DV: perceived value in the course

30
Q

Findings of the study:

A

For participants with relatively low initial course value, this value-boost intervention does seem to
increase course value, course achievement, and intentions to take future courses in this same area
of study.