Week 4 Exam 2 Flashcards
Performance Management (PM)
the process of ensuring that employee’s activities contribute to the organization’s goals; includes defining, monitoring, measuring, evaluating, and providing consequences for performance
PM Steps
- define performance outcomes for the company
- develop employee goals to achieve outcomes
- provide support
- evaluate performance
- identify improvements needed
- provide consequences for performance results
PM Limitations
-Manager Bias
-Lack of feedback & feedback clarity
-Negative reactions
-PM not taken seriously
To improve PM effectiveness…
Organizations must create accountability, continually coach, and establish clear expectations
PM Purposes
-Strategic (link employee behavior to organization goals)
-Administrative (provide decisions about salary, bonuses, hiring, or firing)
-Developmental (basis for developing employees knowledge and skills)
PM Benefits for Employees
Identifies their strengths and weaknesses and establishes a plan to develop skills
PM Benefits for Managers
Helps build strong relationships with employees
Criteria for effective PM
-Fit with Strategy, Acceptability, Specific Feedback, Reliability, Validity
-Only Information, NOT an Evaluation
-Given regularly not just annually
-Links goal setting & feedback
Reliability PM
consistency of the results performance measure will deliver
Interrater reliability
consistency of results when more than one person measures performance
Test-Restest reliability
consistency of results over time
Validity PM
-whether the appraisal measures all relevant aspects of performance
-minimize deficiency (information that is not gathered but is relevant) and contamination (information that is gathered but irrelevant)
Performance Evaluation Approaches
Making Comparisons, Rating Individuals, Measuring Results
Making Comparisons- Performance Evaluation
Ex. Simple Ranking, Forced Distribution, and Paired Comparison
Benefits of Making Comparisons
Counteracts leniency (rating everyone positively) and central tendency (rating everyone as average)
Easy to use
Helps make decisions about raises and layoffs
Simple Ranking
-Requires managers to rank employees in their group from the highest performer to the poorest performer
-Problem: Validity; best and worst do not define what is good and bad about performance nor does it provide actual feedback
Forced Distribution
-Assigns a % of employees to each category in a set of categories (i.e. exceptional, above average, average, etc.)
-Problem: could be incorrect; people who are actually good may be in the lower category)
Paired-Comparison
-Compares each employee with another employee to establish rankings
Problem: time-consuming for a manager
Rating Attributes- Performance Evaluation
-Lists traits and provides a rating scale for each trait; the employer uses a scale to indicate to which extent the employee displays each trait
-Problems: low reliability, rarely linked to the organization’s strategy, doesn’t generate feedback
Rating Behaviors (BARS)
-Rates behavior in terms of a scale showing specific statements of behavior that describe different levels of performance
-Problem: can be biased, time-consuming, and costly
Rating Behaviors (BOS)
-A variation of BARS that uses all behaviors necessary for effective performance to rate performance at a task; better for being objective and generating feedback, and it is easy to use
-Problem: time-consuming and requires a lot of information
Management by Objectives (MBO): - Performance Evaluation
Managers and employees work together to set specific objectives that are tied to the overall business goals; these goals become the standards for evaluating each employee’s performance
Manager’s role in performance evaluation
-Provide frequent feedback throughout the year both formally and informally
-Take the atmosphere/context in consideration for the actual review discussion
-Encourage the individual to actively participate in the discussion, professionally
-Provide a balance of positive and constructive feedback
-Recognize mistakes but make it a learning experience; focus on solving problems for the future
-Focus the feedback on behaviors and NOT personal characteristics
-!!! Accurately rate performance/potential !!!