Week 2 (lectures) Flashcards

1
Q

How can we understand human behavioural diversity and where does it come from?

A

By looking at the emerging theoretical perspectives:

human behavioral ecology, evolutionary psychology, ecology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Did Darwin, Wallace or both think that human mental faculties evolved?

A

Wallace thought the mind was specially created which is a dualistic view. Whereas, Darwin believed it evolved from an earlier form.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The challenge of understanding behavior
i.e., the Genotype → Phenotype relationship

> what does this require us to 
   do?
> what is a geneotype? allele
> what is a phenotype?  
   behaviour
> what were the two flamingo 
   examples?
A
 Understanding behaviour 
   from an evolutionary 
   perspective requires us to 
   balance multiple 
   perspectives. We have  
   genetic information and 
   phenotypic behaviour (the 
   expression of the gene 
   which is triggered by 
  environmental factors). 
 Geneotype (the stuff I’m 
   made from)
 Phenotype (the stuff that I 
   do)
 The relationship between 
   genotype and phenotype 
   can be quite complex. 
   Flamingos are not naturally 
   pink! They’re white and 
   become pink through their 
   food source which triggers 
   the expression of the 
   genotype for pink colour.
 There are melanistic 
   flamingos which have a 
   specific genotype that 
   means regardless of 
   environmental influence they 
   will never be pink 
   (phenotype). 
 Over the past few years this 
   has been debated. People 
   questioning how much of 
   people's personality or the 
   range of personality traits 
   they express (phenotype) 
   due to their genetics? How 
   are different personality 
   traits related and 
   interrelated? Can you be a 
   neurotic extrovert (are the 
   polarized traits that cannot 
   be both expressed or not).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the three sources of influence on behavior:

How do these three sources of influence produce variation in behavior?

A
  1. Genes (fisher and mendail)
  2. Environment (flamingo and
    colour)
  3. Culture (socialization)
 What is the size of the 
   relationship between 
   genotype and phenotype?
 What percentage of it is 
   influenced by genes, 
   environment or culture? 
 The answer to this question 
   will vary depending on what 
   perspective of human 
   diversity you take! 
 For example, in resource 
   inequality and body height 
   are related and change in 
   relation to economic 
   development and is an 
   example of how environment 
   hinders genotypic 
   expression.
 How the different schools of 
   thought view the relationship 
   between genotype and 
   phenotype and the level of 
   important they place on 
   genes, environment and 
   culture.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The beginning of modern psychology:

Who are the (6) important figures?

A
  1. Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920)
  2. William James (1842-1910)
  3. Alfred Binet (1857-1911)
  4. Lewis Terman (1877-1956)
  5. Ivan Pavlov (1849-1936)
  6. John B. Watson (1878-1958)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was William Wundt known for in psychology?

A

Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920)

§ Built the foundation for 
  experimental work in 
  psychology. 
§ He tried to make 
  philosophical claims about 
  the mind and test them in the 
  lab. He developed 
  structuralism which uses the 
  method of introspection to 
  identify the basic elements of 
  psychological experience.
§ He opened the first 
  psychology laboratory. 
§ He had a tendency to ramble 
  and believed that his thought 
  was unassailable to people 
  outside of himself. 
§ A lot of his work on mental 
  faculties was written in 
  German and never translated 
  into English
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was William James known for in psychology?

A
 Wrote a book called the 
   psychologist against himself. 
 He hated research and 
   teaching. 
 He wrote a very important 
   book called the introduction 
   to the principles of 
   psychology; massive work 
   on psychology, he wrote the 
   first textbook on psychology. 
 He drifted away from 
   psychology as he aged and 
   referred to psychology as 
   the nasty little science.
 He drifted into astrocathies 
   into his book the moral 
   equivalent of war.
 He is the first person to use 
   the term evolutionary 
   psychology and was strongly 
   influenced by Darwin. 
 He had strong beliefs in  
   how 
   human behaviour is 
   grounded in human nature. 
  The idea that humans are 
  drawn to the spectacle of 
  war, the romanticism, 
  sacrifice and war will always 
  appeal to us and produce 
  people more inclined to war; 
  yet he still claims that we 
  should replace the draft with 
  a civil draft- to help with 
  natural struggles like, war, 
  famine, disease by 
  channeling our innate 
  inclination of war into 
  positive appeals.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was Alfred Binet known for in psychology?

A
 He is the first person to 
   develop an IQ test designed 
   to develop a tool to allow us 
   to determine which school 
   children needed additional 
   help at school. A more 
   positive version than others 
   eugenicist views.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was Lewis Terman known for in psychology?

A
 Took Binet’s scales that were 
   written in French and 
   translated them and 
   exported them into the US.
 He started applying it to 
   children and then during the 
   world war he used it on 
   soldiers where people with a 
   private education or higher 
   IQ were drafted for the war 
   as an attempt to lower their 
   casualty rates and find 
   leaders (generals etc.). 
 Terman’s work on 
   intelligence overtime 
   became blended with his 
   eugenics views and tried to 
   uses his data obtained to 
   make claims about some 
   ethnicities being less 
   intelligent than others. As 
   reflected in his book called 
   the bell curve where he 
   poses that social class or 
   SES and ethnic influences 
   intelligence.- the differences 
   he found do not hold up to 
   statistical scrutiny! 
 Every year there will still be 
   interesting paper that make 
   interesting claims about 
   religiosity. This one was 
   redacted in 2020. It claimed 
   that intelligence, violent 
   crime and religiosity in 
   countries were interrelated 
   but was subject to poor 
   statistical analysis. A train of 
   thought that is a common pit 
   fall in psychology over the 
   years, eugenic elements.
 Terman’s quote. How he 
   translated Binet’s work 
   reflects his inclination to link 
   intelligence to morality- 
   eugenics- and are inherited 
   traits.
 The debate that intelligence 
   is linked to morality is a 
   claim still made today as 
   seen in this 2020 work. 
   Hamilton Gregory wrote 
   McNamara’s Folly: the use of 
   low-IQ troops in the Vietnam 
   war. They lowered the IQ 
   criteria for recruitment from 
   80. He worked with people 
   who didn’t know what state 
   they’re from or how to tie 
   their own shoes so were 
   kept away from everyone 
   else because they became a 
   danger to themselves and 
   others with high casualty 
   rates.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was Ivan Pavlov known for in psychology?

A
 Pavlovian conditioning or 
   classical conditioning and is 
   referred to as one of the 
   grand daddies of 
   behaviorism.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was John B. Watson known for in psychology?

A
 He wrote a paper called 
   psychology as the behaviorist 
   views it which argued that 
   mental processes are not 
   directly observable and 
   thereby not directly 
   measurable. 
 He believed psychology 
   should focus on measuring 
   observable behaviour. 
 Another granddaddy of 
   behavioralist and kick started 
   the behavioural revolution.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the Ethology perspective and who are two important figures?

A

Ecologist perspective on evolution and animal behaviour.

The two main authors from this branch are:

1. Nickolaas Tinbergen (1907- 
   1988)
- He was imprisoned in a 
  German prisoner of war camp 
  and developed PTSD to 
  German language.
  1. Konrad Lorenz (1903-1989)
    - He got swept up in the Nazi
    movement and got imprisoned
    in a prisoner of war camp in
    Russia.
    - The man with the goslings,
    goslings imprint on the first
    thing they see.
    - They both started talking
    about animal behaviour and
    were very controversial at the
    time because the speculated
    that the same
    behaviour/theories could be
    applied to human behaviour.
    - Konrad Lorenz on aggression
    claimed that humans are
    predisposed to violence and
    therefore war occurs so
    frequently in human history
    and murder; an innate
    tendency to solve problems
    with violence.
    - The Seville (group of Spanish
    psychologists) published a
    statement where they
    rejected his theory on
    violence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which three ethology authors won a Nobel prize in 1973?

A
 Konrad Lorenz, Nickolaas 
   Tinbergen and Karl von 
   Frisch:
- Collectively won a noble 
  prize on their work on animal 
  behaviour in 1973.
- Karl von Frisch (translated to 
  night of fresh) was famous for 
  his work on the dance of the 
  bees, which identified that 
  bee’s fly in a particular 
  pattern to signal to other 
  bees where the food source 
  is.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Who is David Sloan Wilson: within ethology?

A
- Brought a lot of the three 
  ecologists work on human 
  behaviour into psychology 
  post behaviorism. 
- He recently published a book 
  called this view of life: 
  completing the Darwinian 
  revolution which dugout “the 
  four Tinbergen questions”.
- he wrote the "The Four Tinbergen Questions"
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are “The Four Tinbergen Questions” and what is its main probelm?

Ethology

A
 There are a number of things 
   to consider when looking a at 
   a trait in its current form and 
   development:
o Proximal:
- On a Developmental level: 
  Ontogeny; How does this trait 
  develop in individual's lifetime 
  (communication, social norm, 
  fear of snakes etc.).
- On a static level: Mechanism; 
  How does this trait work 
  (structure, physiology, 
  triggers… behavioralists focus 
  on this).
o Distal:
- On a developmental level: 
  Phylogeny; what is the traits 
  evolutionary history (what we 
  will focus on)
- On a static level: Function; 
  how does the trait enhance 
  reproductive success (what 
  we will focus on)
 Problem:
o Proximal developmental 
   causes and distal static 
   causes are hard to 
   distinguish apart. Behaviours 
   that help me in my lifetime 
   now surely also help me in 
   the long run because it 
   allows me to stay alive and 
   reproduce.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Human Behavioural Ecology perspective?

Who are the (4) important figures?

Who is the controversial Napoleon Chagnon?

A

The combination of ecology and psychology perspectives forms the human behavioural ecology stance on human behavioural diversity.

Important Figures are:
§ Monique Borgerhoff Mulder
§ Ruth Mace
§ Donald Brown
§ William Irons
Napoleon Chagnon:
• This is a school of thought     
  tied to anthropology namely 
  Napoleon Chagnon who 
  worked with Yanomamo 
  people or the fierce people. 
• They are a remote tribe who 
  live in the rainforests of 
  South America. 
• He is a controversial person 
  because he claims that these 
  people are exceptionally 
  aggressive and war like 
  because it fits in with their 
  environment. Resource’s 
  scarcity produces this 
  tendency. 
• The catholic church was not 
  a fan of Chagnon. 
• Darkness in El Dorado by 
  Patrick Tierney challenged 
  his ideas. Articles came out 
  that claimed Tierney caused 
  the measles outbreak and 
  that the” scientist killed 
  amazon Indians to test race 
  theory” “he was trying to test 
  eugenic theories” “he was 
  distributing weapons to the 
  tribe to get his data”.
• Following this he was kicked 
  out of the anthropology 
  scientific community.
• Reanalysis of Tierney’s work 
  was poorly collected data but 
  not ethical violations, so he 
  was reinstated into the 
  community and the false 
  claims were redacted.
17
Q

What are the key elements of the human behavior ecology perspective?

What is the main problem?

A

Key Elements:

§ Main focus is on environment.
- Are traits more beneficial in 
  certain environments. 
- The environment constricts 
  the flow from genotype to 
  phenotype.
§ Variation in human behaviour 
  are perceived to be adaptive 
  responses to variation in 
  environments conditions (i.e., 
  food production etc.)
§ Main focus (environment)
- The environment elicits the 
  optimal (most frequently 
  expressed) behavioural 
  phenotypes
- The Human Behaviour 
  Ecologists are neutral to the 
  mechanism through which 
  variation is inherited (i.e., 
  gene, culture, social or 
  psychological).

*Like behaviorists their focused
on the outcome/behaviour
rather than the mechanism

Problem: 
Adaptive how though? What is adaptive? Is the trait an adaption or the by-product of other processes (i.e., spandrels; areas that exist due to architectural necessities but in itself is not adaptive)
- The space is not purposely 
  created. A by-product of 
  another adaptation. In artwork 
  this spandrel space is filled 
  with art to make it interesting 
  as an afterthought because it 
  is not the focus.
-  A review of the spandrel idea 
  rejected the adaptationist view 
  and claimed they were just so 
  stories, that you don’t actually 
  know what an adaption is. 
  People over the years have 
  tried to find ways to identify 
  whether a trait is an adaption 
  or a byproduct.
18
Q

Is the behaviour (phenotype) an adaption?

what two questions do we ask?

A

(A) Is the behaviour adaptive in
the current environment?
(B) Is the behaviour an
adaptation?

*This is the big question identifying if an expressed phenotype is an adaptation, by-product, secondary adaption or random variation-

Examples: Birds-

§ Current Adaptation:
o Yes/Yes: beak shape/size.

§ Past Adaptation:
o Yes/No: Tailbone

§ Exaptation:
o No/Yes: Feathers (more likely 
   to be a secondary 
   adaptation, the evolution of 
   an adaptation to a secondary 
   adaptive role).
§ By-Product (Spandrel):
o No/No: human chins (most 
   animals do not have chins 
   why do humans have chins 
   or belly button; things that 
   sometime baffle scientists).
19
Q

When looking at behaviours or phenotypes we should ask three things?

what are two key points?

A
1. Is it variable across the 
   population or species? 
- Very few people have 
  additional fingers- is not 
  variable!
  1. Is it heritable? inherited trait
    from parent.
    - Hairstyles is variable but not
    heritable.
3. Does it affect reproductive 
    success?
- Bad hairstyles can affect 
  reproductive success. 
  Fingers not so much.
Key Point:
• Not everything that is 
  variable is inherited.
• Not everything that is 
  inherited is variable
20
Q

(D) Sociobiology important figures

A

§ Important figures in Sociobiology
perspective who took a gene-centrist view:

• Edward Wilson: Sociobiology
- Genes keep culture on a leash

• William Hamilton (Hamilton rule/kin
selection rule)

• Marlene Zuk (evolution of sex differences in
behaviour; sexual selection between
high/low parental investment species)

• Robert Trivers (reciprocal altruism; to
describe a process that favors costly
cooperation among reciprocating partners)

• John Maynard Smith (game
theory/mathematical models to explain and
predict animal behaviour)

• George Williams (anti-group selection)

*mainly these authors are biologists so they
take a gene-centrist view.
*Genotype-Phenotype relationship in bold.

21
Q

Richard Dawkin’s (the selfish gene)

Sociobiology

A
  • Wrote the selfish gene. He viewed humans
    as survival machines, robot vehicles blindly
    programmed to preserve the selfish
    molecules known as genes. This is the truth
    which still fills me with astonishment.
  • He believed that human evolution must be
    understood from a genetic perspective.
  • This perspective believes that evolution
    occurs through the differential survival of
    competing alleles within a population.
  • Furthermore, selfish genes (i.e., genes that
    produce a better outcome for survival at the
    expense of other gene expressions) are the
    genes that are most likely to be selected for
    and transmitted from one generation to the
    next because they aid reproductive
    success.

Sociobiology

22
Q
William Hamilton (1964)
Sociobiology
A
  • Hamilton rule otherwise called kin
    selection.
  • Wrote the genetical evolution of social
    behaviour.
  • Takes a genetic perspective in
    understanding social behaviours like
    altruism.
  • He proposes the idea of kinship altruism
    where the reproductive success of genetic
    relatives, even at the cost of organism’s
    own survival or reproduction is beneficial to
    the group or species.
  • An example of how genetic information
    transmission influence behavioural
    (phenotype) variance in prosocial
    behaviours in the population.
  • The more closely related you are to them
    the more willing you are to help them.

Sociobiology

23
Q

Robert Trivers

Sociobiology

A
  • Was an active member of the black panther
    movement (black power movement).
  • He worked with lizards in Jamacia.
  • He focuses on parental investment theory.
  • He wrote the theory on the evolution of
    reciprocal altruism (to describe a process
    that favors costly cooperation among
    reciprocating partners) which explained why
    we see it within species.
  • He also looked at parent offspring conflict
    where parents are genetically motivated to
    equally distribute their investment across
    their children, but the offspring are
    motivated to take more parental
    investment, even to the determent of their
    siblings that they share less genes with.

Sociobiology

24
Q
Edward Wilson (1929)
Sociobiology
A
  • He was an anthologist (I.e. worked with ants).
  • He termed the phrase sociobiology.
  • He proposed the Biophilia hypothesis; that
    humans have an innate desire to interact
    with the environment and is fundamental to
    our well-being.
  • In 1975, He Applied evolution to humans
    again and discusses his gene centrist views
    in his work the battle of BB guns against
    socio-biology.
  • At the time people were NOT receptive to
    his genetics views. Viewing humanity as
    carries of genetic variance caused people
    to to respond aggressively towards them
    (Wilson held reductionist views).
  • “genes keep culture on a leash- but it is a
    very long one”. Cultural variation is
    constrained by the genetic makeup of the
    population. People cut out the last of his
    quote and discredited his reductionist
    sociobiology views as being “just so”
    theories.

Sociobiology

25
Q

Stephen Jay Gould

Sociobiology critique

A
  • Just so stories
  • Outlines this idea of how researcher have a
    tendency to create stories which nicely
    explain variation within species and seem
    plausible without having any scientific
    evidence to support said claims.
  • How the leopard got his spots.

Sociobiology critique

26
Q

E. Wilson & C. Lumsden

Sociobiology

A
  • Genes, mind and culture outlined
    mathematical formulas about gene-
    behaviour relationships.
  • Most scientists at this time did not
    appreciate their work and glanced over it
    but ultimately ignored it.
  • Mathematical models not testable during
    their time due to technological constraints
    that hindered the development of
    mechanistic views in sociobiology.

Sociobiology

27
Q

(E) Evolutionary Psychology (Santa Barbara School)

Three psychology influences?
Key figures in evolutionary psychology:
looks at __ and ___
it covers the ___ period

A

William James
- coined the term evolutionary psychology
and developed “The mind-stuff theory”.

Leda Cosmides (1957) and John Tooby (1952)
- Used the term evolutionary psychology in
their 1992 work the adapted mind.

Key figures in evolutionary psychology:

  • David Schmitt
  • Donald Symons
  • David Buss
  • Sarah Hardy

Looks at Genotype-Phenotype relationship and the role of the environment (but must be a specific environment; ancestorial environment).

The ancestorial environment they’re generally talking about is the Pleistocene (pleistos = most; kainos = new) era which occurred between 1.8/2.6 Million years and 11,700 years ago.

The time where Homo sapiens emerged 200,000 years ago and traits we see today evolved to help hunter-gatherers adapt to the selective pressures of their environment.

28
Q

Key Arguments of Evolutionary Psychology

A

• Ancestral environment (pleistocene)
shaped our human nature (slow evolution;
adaptions from them are still with us today
even if they’re not as useful).
• Focus on the brain (as an evolved organ)
- Mind is not a tabula rasa (i.e., doesn’t have
innate properties that are domain-general)
• Domain specific adaptations (solve a
specific adaptive problems)
• Juke box metaphor:
- Evolved set of psychological mechanisms
to process environmental inputs, particular
inputs flip these mechanisms into a number
of states (specific environmental stimuli
trigger and eliciting appropriate
behavioural outputs)

29
Q

John Lock

EP

A

John Lock cries because In Locke’s philosophy, tabula rasa was the theory that at birth the (human) mind is a “blank slate” without rules for processing data, and that data is added and rules for processing are formed solely by one’s sensory experiences.

Evo psyc.

30
Q

The Modular Mind Hypothesis

EP

A

• Cognitive modules (evolved cognitive
systems that are domain specific)
• Domain-specific (designed through natural
selection to solve a specific problem in our
ancestorial environment and were adaptive
because they increased their reproductive
success and the successful transmission of
genetic information onto their offspring).
• Solving problems encountered by our
ancestors
• Innate & canalized
o No/few individual differences (in cognitive
modules; not shaped by experience)
o Contemporary environment does not
matter (because they have not had enough
time to evolve and be incorporated into the
jukebox).
• Automatic (unconscious awareness)

31
Q

Evoked Culture EP

A
  • Mate attractiveness, Ideal body type &
    Scarcity (Early learning experiences crucial)
  • What body types we find attractive are
    shaped by culture (our upbringings and
    beauty standard within a cultural group) but
    are also influenced by stable environmental
    factors like resource scarcity; overtime in
    environments of scarcity, overtime, people
    prefer to select mates with a higher BMI as
    it indicates health and access to resources.
  • An evolved program in everyone’s mind
    which is elicited in environments of
    resource scarcity (male preference to
    females).
  • Other studies looked at females’
    perceptions of male mates where they
    found the same results.
  • Some studies have shown that recession
    cues (resource scarcity) increase females
    desire for males to own luxury goods (to
    signal access to resources) and males
    desire to purchase luxury goods. However,
    men do not care about women’s signaling
    of wealth; but make up sales go up in order
    to try and outcompete intrasex competitors
    and get a high value mate.
32
Q

“Classic” Evolutionary Psychology

  • Proposing & testing hypotheses
  • How do we test hypothesis about adaptions when we can not go back in time to check?

(6) Steps (Tooby & Cosmides, 1989)

A
  1. Identify adaptive problem (AP) (secure
    mate, threat detection, access to resources)
  2. How did the AP manifest during EEA
    (Pleistocene)?
  3. Computational theory (derive hypotheses)
  4. Determine design features & develop
    candidate models
  5. Eliminate alternatives (experiments & field
    observations; DG or DS)
  6. How well does the model perform?
33
Q

New et al. (2007)

animal/people/object recogniton

A
  • Visual & motivational systems.
  • Change detection paradigm where we are
    better at detecting animal/human change in
    state or location relative to inanimate
    objects.
  • Evolved to suit ancestorial selective
    pressures where spotting animals and
    conspecifics had a large role in survival that
    is not that useful to us now. These systems
    work independently from volitional goals,
    life experience, and is domain specific
    (human/animal and not objects).

Applications:
- This underlies the trick of sleight of hand,
our tendency to focus on the moving hand
rather than the object being hidden.
- Detrimental effects, in a school classroom if
you focus on animals outside rather than the
lecture.
- Tendency to misidentify inanimate objects
or sounds as people is an evolved threat
detection mechanism consequence that
may explain supernatural sightings/beliefs.
- Very few of us will be mauled by tigers, but
busses on streets are a bigger threat in the
current environment (it’s about past
adaptations).

34
Q

New et al. (2007)

- Do males have better spatial memory?- - Can you identify some problems?

A
  • Do males have better spatial memory?
  • Men were hunters (mental rotation) and
    women foragers (absolute spatial location
    and navigation) in hunter-gather societies;
    in general. Evidence that female also
    hunted large game in some hunter-gatherer
    societies; there will always be variation!
  • Farmers market study where they found
    males were better at general non-food
    related navigation but females better at
    absolute and relative spatial navigation on
    food items (significantly). Navigation
    (optimal route/how much you can carry) and
    remembering where food/resources is was
    a sex specific problem for women and not
    men = optimal foraging strategy.
    Independent of sex both of them were
    better and remembering where high calorie
    food was (a mental intenerary for the better
    food is; more willing to exert energy to find
    higher calorie food).
  • Women’s role in Extractive foraging
    required Relative & absolute spatial
    orientation.
    o Females 27% better than males
    o Men performed better on general spatial
    test (separate measure, d=.58)
  • Women are better & calories count
  • Small sample (small degrees of freedom)
  • Salience of specific foods (colour/shape/similarities/differences salience matters)
  • Gender stereotypes (confidence or
    expectations based on gender influence their
    behaviour) & experimenter effects (demand
    characteristics; they change their behaviour to
    act in ways they think the experimenter wants
    them to).
35
Q

Rogers & Weister (2021)

A
  • Optimal foraging studies on existing hunter-
    gatherer societies in Hawaiian and they
    found conflicting to the optimal foraging
    technique (mental itineraries on the optimal
    foraging system prioritizes energy
    consumption to obtain higher quality
    resources) they argue that the mental
    itinerary on the optimal route is based on
    cultural predetermined routes learnt from
    ancestors that are NOT the optimal route.
  • An example of how cultural ideas and
    biological constraints interrelate and
    contradict one another.
36
Q

Some General Thoughts

A
  • Validate your measures (confounds, validity
    and reliability issues)
  • The problem of WEIRD samples
  • Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich,
    Democratic
  • We know a lot about about a small
    proportion from the world that is not
    representative of the global population.
  • Specify & test alternative hypotheses (come
    up with a range of hypothesis and
    systematically test them all to avoid
    developing a just so theory)
  • Optimal levels of reductionism (think about
    what is the optimal level of varring you will
    allow in your model for natural human
    variations; male foragers and female
    hunters).

Paleofantasy:
- Don’t get tricked into wrong ideas about
the ancestorial environment was. For
example, the paleo diet (current fad) is not
accurate to their actual diet.