You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Adaptive peaks:

A

Advantageous results of an adaptation that fails to provide a platform for beneficial future development. For example, parents might successfully punish a child when she has bad grades at school in order for her to have better results, but meanwhile, prevent her from developing a desire to learn that will last beyond school

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Analogical framing:

A

Category of symbolic relational responses establishing the coordination or equivalence between two sets of relations. For example, in the sentence “Trying to deny your emotions is like trying to push a ball under water” there is a relation of equivalence between two conditional relationships (“if you deny your emotions, then they will come back” and “if you push a ball under the water, then it will come back”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Augmenting:

A

Form of relational framing (i.e., language and cognition) leading to a new symbolic consequence, or to an alteration of the impact of an action’s apparent consequence. The consequence can become more or less aversive, and more or less desirable. For example, telling oneself, “I will work late tonight so that I won’t have to work this weekend and I will be able to relax” makes the consequence of working late more desirable. Connecting an action to a source of meaning is a form of augmenting (e.g., “I will spend the evening at home because it will contribute to building intimacy with my family”).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Combinatorial entailment:

A

A core principle of relational framing according to
which symbolic relations can be combined into networks. For example, if we learn that “silla” is the Spanish word for “chaise” in French, and that “chaise” is the equivalent of “chair” in English, then we can derive that “silla” means “chair.” Combinatorial entailment can emerge from an infinite number of relations, as long as there are at least two established relations connecting at least three events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Comparative framing:

A

Category of symbolic relational responses establishing that an event is higher or lower than another or more events along a given dimension. For example, in the sentence, “The horse is bigger than the cat,” “horse” and “cat” are in a relation of comparison according to their sizes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conditional framing:

A

Category of symbolic relational responses establishing that an event conditions another or more events. For example, in the sentence, “If you open the window, it will be cooler in this room,” opening the window and the temperature of the room are in a relation of condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Context:

A

The historical and situational sources of influence on a person’s behaviors, including biological, social, and cultural bases, development and learning history, and the person’s current internal (cognitive and affective) and external environment. For example, a feeling of hunger that comes after several hours of not eating is a context likely to influence the behavior of eating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Context sensitivity

A

The degree to which we notice and respond to the various elements of the context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Contextual cues:

A

Des éléments du contexte qui evoque des réponses à des relations symboliques ou qui en altèrent les caractéristiques.

Certains cues peuvent évoquer une relation symbolique particulière (called “Crel” for the “relational context” in RFT literature). For example, the cue “is” in the sentence, “The cat is black,” evokes a relational response of coordination between cat and black.

D’autres cues spécifient les fonctions pertinentes a la transformation de la fonction d’un stimulus. (called “Cfunc” for the “functional context” in RFT literature)—for example, the cue “smell” in the sentence, “What does the flower smell like?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Coordination framing:

A

Category of symbolic relational responses establishing two or more events as coming together. This might be justified, for example, by their equivalence, similarity, or compatibility. For example, in the sentence, “The cat is black,” “cat” and “black” are in a relation of coordination.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Deictic framing:

A

Category of symbolic relational responses establishing that an event is in a relation of reference or perspective with another or more events. For example, in the sentence, “I am right here behind you; I can see you there,” “I” and “you” are in a deictic relation (interpersonal perspective), as are “here” and “there” (spatial perspective)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Derivation:

A

The production of a symbolic relation that has not been directly trained. For example, if we are told that “chaise” means “chair” and that “chaise” means “silla” (directly trained relations), we are able to derive that “silla” means “chair” (not directly trained relation).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Distinction framing:

A

Category of symbolic relational responses establishing two or more events as different from each other. For example, in the sentence, “The cat is not black,” “cat” and “black” are in a relation of distinction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Flexible sensitivity to the context:

A

Capacity to notice various features of the context and to respond to what is most relevant. For example, a driver stopping at a crossroad even though the light is green because a child is standing in the middle of the road would show flexible sensitivity to the context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Function:

A

The function of a stimulus is its impact or effect on behavior. For example, a loud bell ringing may have the function of making one startle. The symbolic function of a stimulus can also be understood as the meaning of this stimulus due to relational framing. For example, the loud bell ringing could mean that class is over. The function of a behavior is the impact, or effect, it has on the context. For example, drinking alcohol can have the function of reducing anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Functional contextualism:

A

A pragmatic philosophy of science proposing that behavior (including the behavior of scientists) can only be understood in functional relation to its context, and setting out prediction and influence with precision, scope, and depth as its analytic goal.

17
Q

Habituation:

A

Decrease of a reflex response due to a prolonged or repeated exposure to the stimulus triggering this response (e.g., not startling anymore after hearing a loud noise several times)

18
Q

Hierarchical framing:

A

Category of symbolic relational responses establishing that an event is in a relation of hierarchy, inclusion, category, or attribution with another or more events. For example, in the sentence, “Cats belong to the family of felines,” cats and felines are in a relation of hierarchy (category).

19
Q

Inaccurate tracking:

A

Following a rule in order to contact the consequences it specifies, while these consequences don’t match actual experience. In this case, rule following is reinforced by other natural consequences not stated, or not clearly stated, by the rule. For example, a client drinks alcohol to improve his social life, and yet it actually hurts his relationships in the long term. The use of alcohol might be reinforced by the reduction in anxiety that immediately follows drinking. The difference between short-term and long-term consequences is not stated by the rule.

20
Q

Inapplicable tracking:

A

Attempting to follow a rule in order to contact the consequences it specifies when it is actually impossible to do so. In this case, rule following is reinforced by other natural consequences not stated, or not clearly stated, by the rule. For example, a client ruminates about a car accident she was involved in, wishing that she had not driven so fast and hoping for a different outcome (ruminating might be reinforced by a brief reduction of anxiety, but not by a change in what actually happened).

21
Q

Mutual entailment:

A

A core principle of relational framing according to which a symbolic relation between two events must be bidirectional. This bidirectionality allows for the derivation of mutually entailed relations. For example, if we learn that “chaise” means “chair” in French, then we can derive that “chair” means “chaise” in English

22
Q

Operant learning:

A

Learning under the influence of a history of actions in given situations being followed by given consequences (e.g., learning to avoid heights because doing so decreases fear)

23
Q

Opposition framing:

A

Category of symbolic relational responses establishing two or more events as opposed to each other, often along a dimension. For example, in the sentence, “I would like to go out but it is cold outside,” going out and the temperature outside are in a relation of opposition; they are described as incompatible.

24
Q

Pliance:

A

Following a rule because there has been a history of others noting and rewarding the consistency between the action specified by the rule and the performed action. In pliance, social approval for following the rule per se is the primary source of reinforcement (e.g., stopping at a red light even when there is no other car around, because that is what people are supposed to do).

25
Q

Relational framing:

A

Building or deriving symbolic relations among events (i.e., language and cognition).

26
Q

Relational learning:

A

Learning under the influence of intrinsic or symbolic relations among events.

27
Q

Respondent learning:

A

Learning under the influence of pairing between stimuli (e.g., learning to fear cars after having had a car accident because car and pain have been associated).

28
Q

Rule:

A

Set of symbolic relations that specify conditional relationships between an action and its context (e.g., If you open the window, it will be cooler).

29
Q

Social learning:

A

Learning under the influence of others’ behavior (e.g., learning how to find the bathrooms in a restaurant by watching other customers open a door).

30
Q

Tracking:

A

1) Suivre une règle parce qu’il existe une historique renforcatrice lors de laquelle les conséquences spécifiées par la règle ce sont bel et bien avérées. (2) Observer et décrire des relations fonctionnelles entre des événements psychologiques (ex remarquer la conséquence d’un comportement et établir des nouvelles règles basées sur l’observation) qui peuvent fonctionner comme un tracking selon le 1er sens.
For example, modifying a recipe after having used new ingredients that made the cake even more delicious.