Tort/DR: EXTRA Flashcards
When is PEL recoverable?
1. Assumption of responsibility by D?
* D knew why advice was required
* knew advice would be communicated to C
* knew C would likely act on advice without independent inquiry
* C acted to their detriment
2. Was it reasonable for C to rely on advice?
Examples of PEL
- Economic loss caused by acquiring a defective item of property
- Economic loss caused by damage to the property of a 3rd party
- Economic loss where theres no PI or physical property damage
When is PSH recoverable?
- Harm is caused by a sudden shock
- AND is a medically recognised psychiatric condition or shock induced physical condition
- C is primary or secondary victim
PSH: what is a primary victim?
i. Was in actual area of danger
ii. OR reasonably believed they were in danger (was risk of physical injury was foreseeable?)
PSH: what is a secondary victim and when will they be owed a DOC?
1) Witnesses injury to someone else
2) OR fears for the safety of another
- Reasonably foreseeable that person of normal fortitude in Cs position would suffer psychiatric illness?
2.. Proximity of relationship?-close relationship of love/affection with endangered person (rebuttable presumption for parents/spouses) - Proximity time/space? Present at accident/immediate aftermath
- Proximity of perception?-Must see/hear accident/immediate aftermath with own senses
PSH: is 2h after the birth of a child the ‘immediate aftermath’?
Yes
What is the meaning of the fact that an employer’s duty to its employees is personal and non-delegable?
Employer can delegate tasks but is held legally responsible when a contractor it employed is negligent.
Can breaches of statutory duty be relied on by employees for a claim against an employer?
No but can be used to prove breach
Specifically, what do employers owe their employees a duty to provide?
- Competent fellow staff
- Adequate plant/equipment
- Provide and maintain a proper system of work and supervision
- Safe place of work
What defences CANT be relied on by a driver in claims against them by their passengers?
Consent/Volenti
CAN rely on contributory negligence
Exceptions to the defence of consent/volenti?
□ Employees-have no choice to carry out dangerous tasks
□ Rescuers-wont have voluntarily assumed risk if rescuing person endangered by D negligence, under social/legal duty, conduct reasonable, natural and probable in all circumstances
□ Passenger to drunk drive
When wont rescuers have consented to the risk of injury?
- Rescuing person endangered by D negligence
- under social/legal duty,
- conduct reasonable, natural and probable in all circumstances
When will rescuers be found contributory negligent?
Only if shown wholly unreasonable disregard for his/her own safety
When does the defence of illegality not apply?
Caselaw has est that illegality cannot be relied upon where a trespasser is bringing a claim under the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984.
Elements of the defence of consent?
- Claimant had full knowledge of the nature/extent of risk.
AND - Claimant freely consented to accept the risk of injury .
Elements of the defence of contributory negligence?
- carelessness on claimants part
- carelessness had contributed to claimants damage
What does a claim for loss of dependency cover?
Loss of pecuniary benefits from the deceased
Formula for calculating loss of future earnings
1.MULTIPLICAND: gross annual (ADD promotions DON’T ADD inflation LESS tax, NI, pension)
TIMES
2. MULTIPLIER: period of future loss based on pre accident working life expectancy/when can return to work (increased via discount rate of -0.25%)
Damages for PI: when does loss of earning capacity apply?
If C is still working but would suffer a disadvantage on the job market in the future
NOT if they are no longer working at all