Topic 5: FP (1987-97) Flashcards
6
Give an overview of Foreign Policy 1987-97 (including Europe)
- Britain’s place in EU increasingly questioned
- Eastern expansion reduced British influence
- Poor Clinton-Major relations, though special relationship remained strong
- Dominance of US unchallenged e.g. Balkans
- End of Cold War meant Britain and NATO had to find new role
- But Britain expected to play role in new world order
1
Describe Thatcher’s hardening euroscepticism by 1987
- Especially opposed to ‘ever closer union’ of federalist and French socialist Delors (1985-95)
2
Describe Thatcher’s changed attitude on the SEA 1986
- Later claimed that she had misunderstood implications of political unity
- Concerned many Con MPs over her judgement
4
Describe the Bruges Speech 1988
- Sept 1988
- Thatcher set out vision of Europe against greater involvement in social policy
- Coupled national sovereignty with free market economics
- Claimed Britain had not ‘rolled back the frontiers of the state’ to see the reimposed by ‘a European super-state’
3
Describe the reaction to the Bruges speech 1988
- Hositle European reactions
- Single market vision and absence of central European institutions an effective impossibility
- Enthused eurosceptic MPs to create Bruges Group to focus oppositon on increasing integration
3
Describe Thatcher’s support of European expansion
- Encouraged expansion to former communist satellite states
- Would ensure free-trade dominance
- Hoped it would create shallower union to limit centralisation and weaken EU Commission power
3
Describe the 3 stage route to a Economic and Monetary Union recommended by the Delors Report 1989
- membership of ERM
- currency alignment
- establishment of single currency and central bank
2
Describe the significance to the Delors Report 1989
- Currency union could lead to common budgetary policy to stabilise currency
- Would lead to huge impact on national fiscal policy
3
Describe the reaction to the Delors Report 1989 in Britain
- Threat to sterling fuelled Thatcher oppositon to EMU
- Lawson proposed alternative scheme involving competing currencies
- Discredited from trying to steal initiative from Delors
3
Describe the social charter
Laid down minimal conditions…
- education
- employment
- social security
3
Describe the reaction to the social charter in Britain
- Would threaten British competitiveness and further weaken sovereignty
- Thatcher vehemently opposed
- Delors recieved standing ovation at TUC Conference 1988
3
Describe Thatcher’s concessions on Europe
- Under pressure, increased Britain’s contribution to EEC social fund
- Agreed to stage 1 of Delors Report (European Monetary System)
- Thus able to delay timetable for Stages 2 and 3 and refuse to accept social charter
4
Describe continuing division over the ERM under Thatcher
- Joined in 1990
- French and Germans pushed ahead and set Sept 1994 as date for Stage 2 implementation
- Thatcher undermined her own CX Lawson
- Led French/Germans to believe she was determined to wreck EMU
4
Describe Thatcher’s positive relations with Europe
- Initial enthusiasm for Single Market
- Pointed Europe towards greater competition
- Supportive of some European ventures e.g. Channel Tunnel joint project with France started construction in 1988
- Patriotic rhetoric arguably masked acceptance of ceding of British sovereignty
How much of British trade was with the EEC by 1990?
over 1/2
3
Describe Thatcher’s views on Europe post-premiership
- Much of euroscepticism developed after she left office
- Fuelled eurosceptic cabinet ministers (Portillo, Redwood) + backbenchers (IDS, Bill Cash)
- Called for referendum on Maastricht a la Denmark, etc
3
Outline the changing climate of Europe during Major’s premiership
- German reunification
- Incorporation of Eastern European states
- Stronger emphasis on common defence policy and strategy
3
Describe division over a common European security policy
- Europe-wide security policy needed after Yugoslav wars began in 1991
- Britain preferred policies be left with UN and NATO
- France and Germany wanted EU security policy independent of USA