Title 4 - [2/2] (172-187) Flashcards
Article 172
Falsification by private documents and use of falsified documents
what is a document?
term used to describe papers, instruments, written statements and anything that has been written down.
Black’s Law Dictionary
What are the acts punished?
- falsification of public, official, or commercial document by a PRIVATE individual
- falsification of private document by ANY person
- Use of falsified document
What are the elements of falsification under paragraph 1 of Art 172
- That the offender is a private individual OR a public officer or employee who did NOT take advantage of his official position.
- That he committed ANY of the acts of falsification enumerated in Art. 171.
- That the falsification was committed in a public or official or commercial document.
What are the elements of falsification under paragraph 2 of Art 172
- That the offender committed ANY of the acts of falsification, except those in paragraph 7, enumerated in Art. 171.
- That the falsification was committed in ANY private document.
- That the falsification caused damage to a third party OR at least the falsification was committed with intent to cause such damage.
What are the elements of falsification under paragraph 3 of Art 172
Introducing in a judicial proceeding
1. That the offender knew that a document was falsified by another person.
2. That the false document is embraced in Art. 171 OR in ANY subdivisions No. 1 or 2 of Art. 172.
3. That he introduced said document in evidence in ANY judicial proceeding.
Use in any other transaction
1. That the offender knew that a document was falsified by another person.
2. That the false document is embraced in Art. 171 or in any of subdivision No. 1 or 2 of Art. 172.
3. That he used such document (not in judicial proceedings).
4. That the use of the false document caused damage to another OR at least it was used with intent to cause such damage
What is the essence of the crime of falsification?
act of making untruthful or false statements
- not in book
Must there be a genuine document in falsification?
In falsification by (1) making alteration or intercalation, or (2) including in a copy a different statement, there MUST BE A GENUINE DOCUMENT THAT IS FALSIFIED.
Thus, in paragraphs 6, 7, in its second part, and 8 of Art. 171, the law requires that there be a genuine document where the intercalation or alteration is made changing its meaning.
In the other paragraphs of Art. 171, falsification may be committed by simulating or fabricating a document.
In what instance will falsification not bring about criminal liability?
[my own answer] - when it does not satisfy the elements of falsification
what is feigning
simulating a; [shr] —as in shush
- signature,
- handwriting or
- rubric
out of one which does not in fact exist.
If a person used a falsified document what should be the proper charge against him?
falsification of a POC document be a means of committing estafa
- actually using that falsified POC document to defraud another is ESTAFA
note: but the damage to another is caused by the commission of estafa and not by the falsified document per se. use of falsification is a necessary means to commit estafa
there’s more in the book
What is the effect when the document falsified is
(a) a private document and
(b) a public document?
WiIl falsifying private documents constitute criminal liability?
[A]
mere falsification of private documents is NOT enough
For that, two things are required:
(1) He must have counterfeited the false document.
(2) He must have performed an independent act which operates to
requisites of counterfeiting
Imitation of another’s signature need not be perfect. It is necessary only
(1) that there be anINTENT to imitate, OR an ATTEMPT to imitate, and
(2) that the two (2) signatures or handwritings, the genuine and the forged, bear some resemblance to each other.
(U.S. vs. Rampas)
In falsification of private documents what will determine whether the crime committed is estafa or falsification?
The essential difference between falsification of private documents and that of public or official documents lies in the fact that while in the former, the prejudice to a third party is primarily taken into account so that if such damage is not apparent, or there is at least no intention to cause it, the falsification is not punishable; in the latter, that is, in the falsification of public or official documents, the principal thing punished is the violation of public faith and the perversion of truth which the document solemnly proclaims, and for this reason it is immaterial whether or not some prejudice has been caused to third persons
What is the presumption on the possession and use of falsified documents?
The possessor of a falsified document is presumed to be the author of the falsification.
In falsification by “making untruthful statements in a narration of facts (p.4 of art. 171)”
what requisites must concur?
- That the offender makes in a document statements in a narration of facts;
- That he has a legal obligation to disclose the truth of the facts narrated by him;
- That the facts narrated by the offender are absolutely false; and
- That the perversion of truth in the narration of facts was made with the wrongful intent of injuring a third person.
What is the presumption when a document is a public document?
In falsification under par. 2 of art. 171, should the document be an authentic official paper?
Is good faith a defense in falsification?
lack of malice OR *criminal intent** is a defense FOR falsification of public document
While it is true that falsification of a public document does not require as an essential element, damage to a third person or intent to cause such damage, signing the name of a deceased heir in a deed of sale of a piece of land owned in common by several heirs, having been done by the accused with the authority of the children of the deceased heir, is not a punishable act of falsification, the accused not having acted with malice. (People vs. Unico)
what are the four (4) kinds of documents?
public
private
official
commerical dox
what is a public document?
is any instrument authorized by
- a notary public or
- a competent public official, with the solemnities required by law.
(Cacnio, et al. vs. Baens)
what is an official document?
a document which is issued by a public official IN THE EXERCISE of the functions of his office.
- an official document is also a public document. It falls within the larger class called public documents.
(U.S. vs. Asensi)
Examples of public or official documents
- all pleadings filed with the court
- petition for habeas corpus
several more detailed examples in the book
what is a private document?
a deed or instrument executed by a private person WITHOUT the intervention of a notary public or other person legally authorized, by which document some disposition or agreement is proved, evidenced or set forth.
(U.S. vs. Orera)
Example of a private document
A theater ticket is a private document, because it evidences an agreement for the rent of a place in the theater to enable a possessor to witness a theatrical performance.
what is a commercial document
- any document regulated by the Code of Commerce OR any other commercial law
(Pp v Co Beng) - are used by businessmen to help promote and facilitate trade
(Pp v Lizares)
Examples of Commercial Documents
a lot in the book page 234
Are cash disbursement vouchers commercial documents?
No. CDV or receipts evidencing payment to borrowers of the loans given to them are NOT negotiable instruments NOR are they regulated by Code of Commerce.
they are private documents
Documents acknowledged before a notary public are public documents except:
last wills & testaments (private)
When is a private document considered a public document?
- In a criminal prosecution for falsification of a document, even if the falsification occurred before the document was presented to the notary, the crime is still characterized as falsification of a public document.
- a private document may become a public one when it becomes part of an official record AND signed by a public official authorized by law
173
Acts punished in 173
- Uttering fictitious wireless, telegraph, or telephone messages;
- Falsifying wireless, telegraph or telephone messages.
- Using such falsified messages. With respect to No. 3, the offender need not be connected to the government or to such corporation.