Title 3 - [1/3] (134-142) Public Order Flashcards
What are the crimes against public order?
RCPC DISPCI - chap 1
ADVI-IDID-RTUA-DEEVC - chap 2
Rebellion or insurrection (Art. 134)
Coup d’état (Art. 134-A)
Penalty for Rebellion, Insurrection, Coup D’etat (Art. 135)
Conspiracy and proposal to commit coup d’état (Art. 136) [i think this includes 134]
Disloyalty of public officers or employees (Art. 137)
Inciting to rebellion (Art. 138) [check again]
Sedition (Art. 139)
Penalty for sedition (140)
Conspiracy to commit sedition (Art. 141)
Inciting to sedition (Art. 142)
Acts tending to prevent the meeting of Congress and similar bodies (Art. 143)
Disturbance of proceedings of Congress or similar bodies (Art. 144)
Violation of parliamentary immunity (Art. 145)
Illegal assemblies (Art. 146)
Illegal associations (Art. 147)
Direct assaults (Art. 148)
Indirect assaults (Art. 149)
Disobedience to summons issued by Congress, its committees, etc., by the constitutional commissions, its
committees, etc. (Art. 150)
Resistance and disobedience to a person in authority or agents of such
person (Art. 151)
Tumults and other disturbances of public order (Art. 153)
Unlawful use of means of publication and unlawful utterances (Art. 154)
Alarms and scandals (Art. 155)
Delivering prisoners from jails (Art.156)
Evasion of service of sentence (Art 157)
Evasion on occasion of disorders (Art. 158)
Violation of conditional pardon (Art. 159)
Commission of another crime during service of penalty imposed for another previous offense (Art. 160)
CHAPTER ONE – ______________________
CHAPTER ONE – REBELLION, COUP D’ETAT, SEDITION, AND DISLOYALTY
ARTICLE 134 – ___________
ARTICLE 134 – REBELLION OR INSURECTION
How is the crime of rebellion committed?
The following elements MUST be present:
That there be –
o Public uprising; and
o Taking of arms against
the government
That the purpose of the uprising or movement is either –
o To remove from the
allegiance to said
Government or its laws:
- The territory of the
Philippines or any
part thereof; or
- Any body of land,
naval or other armed
forces; OR
o To deprive the Chief
Executive or Congress,
wholly or partially, of
any of their powers or
prerogatives.
What is the nature of the crime of rebellion?
The crime of rebellion or inciting it is by nature a crime of the masses or multitude. This means that there is a vast movement of men and a complex net of intrigues and plots.
Not merely a challenge to the constituted authority by also civil war on a bigger or lesser scale
Based on the RPC, there must be uprising AND taking up of arms
Rebellion is a continuing crime hence rebels can be arrested at any time without a warrant
[gpt #2]
In summary, the second point emphasizes that rebellion is not merely a symbolic or verbal challenge to authority; it involves a level of organized resistance that can escalate into a form of civil war. The scale of this conflict may vary, but the core idea is that it goes beyond mere expressions of dissent and involves a more significant and organized movement against the constituted authority.
Is it necessary that the purpose of rebellion be accomplished for an accused to be guilty of the crime?
No. There is no need for an actual clash of arms with the forces of the government rebellion or conspiracy to
commit rebellion exist.
The elements of rebellion do not contemplate on the outcome of the acts.
So, the crime of rebellion is complete the very moment a group of rebels rise publicly and take arms against the Government, for the purpose of overthrowing the same by force.
To make out a case of rebellion, what motivation for the killing of the victim by the offender must be shown?
politically motivated
crime of killing is in furtherance of rebellion
The motive must not be personal in part of the offender but merely in pursuance of the movement to overthrow the duly constituted authorities. It must be for some political purpose or motive.
Who has the burden of proving the political motivation in the cases of rebellion?
The burden of demonstrating political motive falls on the defense since motive is a state of mind which the accused better than any individual knows.
May offenders be charged for “common crimes”, e.g. murder and possession of firearm, separately from rebellion and insurrection?
Yes, when the motive of such common crimes is personal in nature.
Under the RPC, rebellion and insurrection are distinct crimes from murder, homicide, arson, and other common crimes.
However, under the Political Offense Doctrine, common crimes subversive ends (or purposes enumerated in Art 134). Then these common crimes are absorbed in the crime of rebellion and cannot be regarded nor penalized as distinct crimes themselves.
Is there a complex crime of rebellion with murder and other common crimes?
LB
No, there is no complex crime of rebellion. Under the Hernandez Ruling, it is only charged as a single offense.
Since there is only one crime committed, then there is no complex crime.
when are common crimes absorbed? when are they not?
Homicide is absorbed by rebellion if the commission of the homicide is in furtherance of the intent of rebellion. Otherwise, it should be treated as a separate crime of homicide.
The rule is that common crimes may be treated as separate crimes if they are
not committed in furtherance of the political end of rebellion – that the
purpose is personal in nature. If they are committed for some political end, then they are deemed absorbed in rebellion.
How do you contemplate the levying of war against the government during peacetime?
When the levying of war against the government in peacetime is for the purposes enumerate in Art 134, then the crime is rebellion. The key condition here is peacetime, because when the levying of war is done in times of war, the crime committed may be treason under Art. 114.
When a criminal act has elements common to more than one offense, who has the option to choose the case to file?
[gpt]
where a single act could potentially constitute multiple criminal offenses, the question is inquiring about who has the authority to decide which charge or charges should be brought against the accused.
It is the RPC in relation to the evidence in the hands of the public prosecutor (fiscal), and not the latter’s whim or caprice, which gives the choice. The RPC allows separate prosecutions for either murder or rebellion, although not for both where
the indictment (charge) alleges that the former has been committed in furtherance of or in connection with the latter.
The public prosecutor has the option to ascertain which prosecutions should be initiated based on the evidence at hand. That a criminal act may have elements common to more than one offense does not rob the prosecutor of
that option and does not mandatorily require him to charge the lesser offense although the evidence before him may warrant prosecution of the more serious one.
Distinguish political crimes v. common crimes insofar as goal/purpose/motive is concerend
[PC]
Political crimes are those directly aimed against the political order. They include
common crimes when they are committed to achieve a political purpose. The defining factor is the intent or motive.
[CC]
done for private purposes
Distinguish rebellion under Art 134 from treason under Art 114.
NATURE of the crime
(114) - crimes against national security
(134) - crimes against public order
[this is obvious]
WHEN committed
(114) - Treason is a war
crime. So, there must be a war where the Philippines is
involved.
(134) - committed when there is no war
OFFENDER
(114) - requires offender to owe allegiance to gov’t
(134) - not require
ACTS constituting the crime
(114) - (1) levying war against the gov’t OR (2) adherence to the enemy by giving aid or comfort
(134) - act of giving aid or comfort cannot constitute rebellion
Distinguish between rebellion and insurrection.
[Rebellion]
Rebellion is more frequently used where the object of the movement is completely to overthrow and supersede the existing government.
[Insurrection]
Insurrection is commonly employed in reference to a movement which seeks merely to effect some change of minor importance, or to prevent the exercise of governmental authority with respect to particular matters or subjects
ARTICLE 134-A. _____________
ARTICLE 134-A. COUP D’ETAT
What are the elements of the crime of coup d’etat?
That the offender is a person or persons belonging to the military or police OR holding any publicoffice or employment.
That it is committed by means of a swift attack accompanied by violence, intimidation, threat, strategy or stealth; (VITSS)
That the attack is directed against the duly constituted authorities of the Republic of the Philippines, or
(1) any military camp or installation,
(2) communication networks,
(3) public utilities or
(4) other facilities needed for the exercise and continued possession of power;
That the purpose of the attack is to seize or diminish state power.
How many offender/s is/are there in the crime of coup d’etat committed?
Number of offenders — singly or simultaneously carried out anywhere
in the Philippines
By whom — by any person or persons, belonging to the military or police or holding any public office or employment, with or without civilian support or participation
What is the essence of the crime of coup d’etat?
The essence of the crime of coup d’etat is a swift attack upon the facilities of the Philippine Government, military camps and installations, communication
networks, public utilities, and facilities essential to the continued possession of governmental powers.
Distinguish between rebellion under Art. 134 and coup d’etat under Art 134-A. aside from its elements
PRINCIPAL PARTICIPANTS
[134]
Must be members of the AFP, PNP, or any public officers
[134-A]
Requires member to be AFP, PNP, or any public officer w/ OR w/o civilian support
NUMBER
[134]
Multitude of people
[134-A]
Singly or collectively
CRIMINAL OBJ
[134]
Overthrow the government and for the offenders to establish their own
[134-A]
Destabilize, immobilize or paralyze the existing government by taking over such facilities
MEANS
[134]
Committed through force and violence [fv]
[134-A]
Committed through force and violence with threat intimidation, strategy, or stealth [vitss]
ARTICLE 135. _____________________________
ARTICLE 135. PENALTY FOR REBELLION, INSURRECTION, OR COUP D’ETAT
Who are liable for rebellion, insurrection and/or coup d’etat?
- LEADERS
Any person who promotes, maintains or heads a rebellion or insurrection
Any person who leads, directs, or commands other to undertake a coup d’etat
PARTICIPANTS
Any person who participates, or executes the commands of others in rebellion or insurrection;
Any person in the government who participates, or executes directions or commands of others in undertaking a coup d’etat
Any person not in the government service who participates, supports,
finances, abets or aids in
undertaking a coup d’etat
When a leader of rebellion, insurrection or coup d’etat is not known, who shall be
deemed the same?
What if the leader is outside of Philippines, will he be liable?
Any person who, in fact directed others, spoke for them, signed receipts, and
other documents issued in their name, or performed similar acts on behalf of the
rebels shall be deemed the leader.
Note: If committed outside of the Philippines, Article 2(5) of RPC will not apply because rebellion and coup d’etat are crimes against public order.
Article 2(5) will apply only on crimes against national security and law of
nations.
ARTICLE 136. ___________________________
ARTICLE 136. CONSPIRACY AND PROPOSAL TO COMMIT COUP D’ETAT, REBELLION OR INSURRECTION
When is there conspiracy and proposal to commit coup d’etat, rebellion and insurrection?
There is conspiracy to commit rebellion when two or more persons come to an
agreement to rise publicly and take arms against the Government for any of the purposes of rebellion AND decided to commit it.
There is proposal to commit rebellion, when the person who has decided to
rise publicly and take arms against the Government for any of the purposes of rebellion proposes its execution to other person or persons.