Title 13 - (353-364) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is defamation of character

A

Libel is a form of defamation of character of a certain individual.

The nature and consequences thereof are, in its essence, universal.

DoC — may be directed against one’s dignity, personality, condition, status, sex, and other similar characteristics or attributes.

In every act of libel, there is malice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is libel?

A

A libel is public and malicious imputation of a [ACCCORiDSV] crime, or of a vice or defect, real or imaginary, or any act, omission, condition, status, or circumstance

tending to cause the [ddc] dishonor, discredit, or contempt of a natural or juridical person, [or] to blacken the memory of one who is dead.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Malice in Libel

A

Malice is the
- intentional doing of a wrongful act
- without just cause or excuse,
- with the intent to inflict an injury or under circumstances that the law will presume an evil intent.

Malice in libel, therefore, is the unwarranted, unjustified, and wrongful motive, intention, and objective of the author of a certain libelous remark to make known to third persons the supposed denigration of another individual, who is the subject of the libelous attacks.

  • denigration - attack on the capacity, character or reputation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the test of defamatory character of words used

A

a charge is sufficient if the words are calculated to induce the hearers to [suppose and understand] that the person against whom they were uttered was;
- guilty of certain offenses or
- are sufficient to impeach his honesty, virtue, or reputation or
- to hold him up to public ridicule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Malice in the Law

A

Malice in Law (or Presumed Malice) is that kind of malice that the law presumes upon the commission of a certain intentional wrongdoing. It need not be proved by evidence or even cumulative proofs tending to establish the same, as the law steps in to state it as such.

It dispenses with the proof of malice when words that raise the presumption are shown to have been uttered. It is also known as constructive malice, legal malice, or implied malice.

Necessarily, it is the tenor of the content that is basically the basis in determining whether the same is malicious or not. If such contents, statements, or other descriptions are derogatory or defamatory in character, even without probing on its truthfulness, much less proving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the defenses when assailing the law’s presumption of malice?

A

Justification
Good Faith
Privilege

justification (it is true)
good faith (reasonable grounds to believe it was true)
privilege (falls under freedom of speech, etc.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the exceptions to Presumed Malice (Malice in Law)?

A

[Art. 354]. Requirement for publicity. — Every defamatory imputation is presumed to be malicious, even if it be true, if no good intention and justifiable motive for making it is shown, except in the following cases:

[There are two situations where the presumption of malice doesn’t apply:]

  1. A private communication made by any person to another in the performance of any [lms] legal, moral or social duty; and
    - ex. reporting child abuse to authorities
  2. A fair and true report, made in good faith, WITHOUT any comments or remarks, of any judicial, legislative or other official proceedings which are NOT of confidential nature, [or] of any statement, report or speech delivered in said proceedings, [or] of any other act performed by public officers in the exercise of their functions.

[Art. 361.] Proof of the truth. — In every criminal prosecution for libel, the TRUTH may be given in evidence to the court and if it appears that the matter charged as libelous is true, ||and, MOREOVER, that it was published with good motives [and] for justifiable ends, || the defendants shall be acquitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

EXC of Presumed Malice, even if the imputations appear to be defamatory, it will NOT be presumed malice if they fall within the scope of 354

A
  1. Private [privilege] communication made in the performance of legal, moral, and social duty
  2. fair and true report of;
    a. any JUDicial, LEGislative, or other official proceeding which are NOT confidential in nature
    b. any [ssr] statement, speech, or report delivered in said proceedings
    c. any other act performed by public officers in the exercise of their functions

[Art. 361.] Proof of the truth. — In every criminal prosecution for libel, the TRUTH may be given in evidence to the court and if it appears that the matter charged as libelous is true, ||and, MOREOVER, that it was published with good motives [and] for justifiable ends, || the defendants shall be acquitted
.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Malice in Fact

A

is a positive desire and intention to annoy and injure. It may denote that the defendant was actuated by ill will or personal spite.

It is also called express malice, actual malice, real malice, true malice, or particular malice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Malice in Fact

v

Malice in Law

A

[MIF]
- no relevant defenses
- burden of proof on the accused to prove def’t acted with malice

[MIL]
- has defenses
- burden on proof on the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the kinds of defamatory cases?

A
  1. Libel (355-357)
  2. Oral defamation (358)
  3. Slander by Deed (359)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is libel?

A

It is a defamatory remark, statement, or description in writing or printed on any canvass that is attributed and directed to certain individual. It has to be made known to third persons.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is oral defamation?

A

As differentiated from Libel per se, this one, while also a defamatory remark, is NOT printed or in writing. Oral Defamation is done by uttering derogatory statements towards a certain person for the purpose of maligning him or her in public, with greater extent besmirching (ruining) his or her reputation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is slander by deed

A

They mainly differ in the manner of their respective executions. In the two previous defamatory acts, one is writing, and the other is uttering. On the other hand, Slander by Deed is the physical act of defaming. For instance, slapping a person in front of the public for the purpose of degrading his or her dignity. Holding the breast of a woman in full view of by standers with the objective of shaming her

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

libel v. oral defamation v. slander by deed

A

Libel: Defamation through written or printed communication.

Oral Defamation (Slander): Defamation through spoken communication.

Slander by Deed: Defamation through actions or gestures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the requirement of publication mean?

A

means that the libelous remarks, defamatory utterances, or slander acts are made in PUBLIC. It must have been witnessed, read, or heard by third persons, not necessarily the complainant or the injured party himself or herself.

note
Even if the injured party is not there when the utterances have been made or he or she does not have the occasion to read the libelous writings, publication is satisfied if the same came to the knowledge of third persons.

17
Q

Is one allowed to utter or write defamatory remarks even if true against another individual?

A

consider the [top] tenor, objective, privilege nature of the remarks

[Tenor] - content & substance of the remark will it tend to cast dishonor, discredit, or contempt to the person to whom it is referred to, or to blacken the memory of the dead.

[Objective] - justified, ++no personal ill-will against the person** whom the statement are directed to, and it is not a personal & wrongful attack

[Privilege] - done in the performance of legal, moral, or social duty [or] is it a fair report of any public proceeding or any act of public official

if ALL are present, then
- tho derogatory, not libelous per se
- complainant burden to prove that such malicious and fueled with malice

18
Q

A spoke derogatory words and published it besmirching the reputation of public officer B. A had the intent to damage his reputation and intent was proven.

A raised the defense of “privilege communication”. Will his defense prosper?

A

No, when malice in fact is proven, assertions and proofs that the libelous articles are qualifiedly privileged communications are futile, since being qualifiedly privileged communications merely prevents the presumption of malice from attaching to a defamatory imputation.

because privilege communications is a defense in overcoming the presumption from malice in law, it is of no moment in cases where malice in fact has been proven.

19
Q

what is the Cybercrime Law RA?

A

RA 10175

20
Q

Libel and Social Media

A

RA 10175 provides in Chapter 2 Section 4

Libel - unlawful or prohibited acts of libel as defined in Art 355 of RPC, as amended, committed through a computer system [or] any other similar means which may be devised in the future

[Art. 355]
“Article 355. Libel means by writings or similar means. – A libel committed by means of writing, printing”

  • The posts in social media are considered “in writing” or “printed”
21
Q

What will determine the gravity of an oral defamation?

A
  1. the expression used
  2. personal relations of the accused and offended party
  3. circumstances surrounding the case
  4. social standing and position of the offended party
22
Q

when is it simple oral defamation vs grave oral defamation

A

page 1020 of reyes

23
Q

CHAPTER 2

A

INCRIMINATORY MACHINATIONS

24
Q

363

A

Incriminating innocent person

25
Q

Elements of Incriminating an innocent person

A
  1. That the offender performs an act;
  2. That by such act he directly incriminates or imputes to an INNOCENT person the commission of a crime; and
  3. That such act does NOT constitute perjury.
26
Q

2 KINDS OF INCRIMINATING AN INNOCENT PERSON

A
  1. Making a statement which constitutes:
    a. defamation, or
    b. perjury (if made under oath and is false)
  2. Planting evidence

note
Art 363 is limited to planting evidence and the like, which tend directly to cause false prosecution

27
Q

-Incriminatory machinations distinguished from defamation

A

I.M. does NOT avail himself of written or spoken words.

I.M. refers to the actions taken by the offender to falsely accuse someone. It emphasizes the act of setting a trap or scheme (machinations) to incriminate someone.

28
Q

When is there a CC of Incriminating an innocent person (363) through unlawful arrest (269)?

A

As far as this crime is concerned, this has been interpreted to be possible ONLY in the so-called planting of evidence.

If this act is resorted to, to enable officers to arrest the subject, the crime
is unlawful arrest through incriminating innocent persons.

[ex]
unlawful arrest (Article 269) becomes a means to achieve the incrimination of an innocent person (Article 363). Juan uses the false accusation to get the police to unlawfully arrest Pedro.

29
Q

364

A

Intriguing against honor

30
Q

how is 364 committed?

A

It is committed by any person who shall make any intrigue which has for its principal purpose to blemish the honor or reputation of another person.

[AI]
intrigue - means secret or underhanded maneuvers. It refers to the indirect and manipulative actions taken to harm someone’s reputation.

31
Q

difference of Slander by deed (359) vs Intriguing Against Honor (364)

A

SBD
- requires publicity
- offender directly does it

IAH
- does not require publicity
- offender indirectly machination to do it

[both]
- aimed to damage reputation