Test #4 - Culture Flashcards
Role of deaf people and culture in Deaf education policy and practice
Involved with Deaf education policy and practice within early intervention programs as mentors + sign language teachers + teachers + administrators + aides + professors + writers + researchers (involoved Preschool - high education)
Why involve deaf adults in education of young deaf children?
Since milan confernace (banning ASL) it has been hard for deaf people to contribute to deaf education because deaf people were not hired in K-12/college programs
Why were deaf adults not hired in schools/colleges?
Because of poor academic preparation + state competency exams + other discriminatory practices
Nadelle Grantham
Deaf women expelled from southeastern Louisiana university because she was deaf –> won in trial under ADA act
Early identification of deaf
Babies are screened for hearing loss a few hours after birth –> referals are made to audiologists if child does not pass screening
Audiologists telling parents about hearing loss
Audiologist have responsibility to tell parents about child’s hearing loss –> can evoke string emotions of helplesness in parents –> BUT today more audiologists have counseling training and can give parents info about language learning (includes learning about ASL and deaf culture)
New training for audiologists
Innovative doctoral programs in Audiology (Aud Programs) with multicultural orientations –> allows audiologists in training to take courses in Deaf studies + ASL + language development
Effect of providing parents with language options
Provding parents with language options that include ASL and deaf culture open the deaf child’s work into realizing their language learning potential early
Parents role in deaf eduction
Parents have played a pivitol part in deaf education since its founding
Ex. Mason Cogswell –> advocated for Alice –> eventually led to the establishment of American School for the Deaf
Support for hearing parents
- Support organizations (families can meet deaf role models and mentors + receuve ASL intruction_
- Get advice on rasing deaf child (through networking with families)
***Meeting deaf adults is important so parents can learn how ASL and deaf culture can support child’s early language development and self identity
Parents + Legislation
Parents have also been advocates for their children on legislative front
Example - 1975 –> parents of children with cognitive disabilities were catalysts for Education of Handicapped Children Act –> Evolved into Individuals with Disabilities act and No child Left behind Act
Individuals with Disabilities act and No child Left behind Act
Set the standard that all disabled children should be expected to perform as non-disabled children do
Every Student Suceeds Act
New law replaces No child left behind act
Part A of Points in Individuals with Disbailities Act (IDEA)
- Free and appropriate public education
- Placement in the least restrictive environment
- Protecting the roghts of children with disabilities and their parents
- Ensuring children get education
***ALSO Children are able ti have appropriate evaluation + parent teacher participation + Proceduaral Safeguards
Childs plan = Indiviual Education Plan (IEP) –> must be developed each year with tecaher + parent + professionals
Part B of Points in Individuals with Disbailities Act (IDEA)
Covers assistance for education of all children with disabilities (3021 YO)
***Must be developed each year
Part C Points in Individuals with Disbailities Act (IDEA)
Protects infants and toddlers with disbailities from birth to 3 YO
***Make a Indiviaul Family service Plan based on strengths and needs
Individual Family Service PLan
Made for each family based on strengths and needs
ISFP team - two early education interventionists+ family
Team uses the informationo the family provides + results of evalutions
Deaf mentors in IFSP
Deaf mentors play a role in IFSP because provide oaents with information about ASL and deaf culture
Part D Points in Individuals with Disbailities Act (IDEA)
Covers national support programs (federal level) + cover confidentuiality of information + transition of services and disiplining students + support of technology
Recent Trend in IEP
Recent trend = to include ASL specialist on IEP team –> ensure that ASL is being evaluated and goals are established in IEP
- Deaf parents often ask for ASL evaluation BUT many hearing parents may not be aware that an ASL evaluation would be usful
ASL asseemnt
Crital peice in IEP - impritant for development of ASL and english
ASL Assesments in ISP + IEPs
ASL assemsnents are often omitted from many deaf children’s IFSP + IEPs bvecayse of lack of awareness of ASL early language measurment tools
NOW - there are tests that measure the receptive skills of deaf child’s ASL skills
Why did Every child Suceeds come into Law
Because NCLB failed and had harsh penalties on schools that did not acheive goals
ESSA vs. NCLB
ESSA still have standradized testing like NCLB BUT it shifts accountability from teh federal givernmnet to states = allows states to develope their own testing
ESSA also reduces the number of tests given each year
ESSA also moves away from only using standradized testing - allows states to use multiple measures of student learning + other indicators
Effects of new ESSA law
ESSA may alleviate some concerns of special ed leaders (including leaders in deaf education) BUT it will depend on mandates of the states
Past concern of NCLB
- In the past - NCLB have raised concern in deaf community because it does not take into account dead children’s language deprivation + other background factors
- ASLO many interpreted NCLB to mean that all deaf children should be educated with nondeaf peers
- Deaf community thinks that NCLB has moved away from providing individualzed instruction to deaf children tp model of putting deaf children into public school
Child First campeign
Movement that challenges schools interpretation of IEP and LRE + developed new legislation instiatives (Example - Alice Cogsween and Anne Sullivan Macy Act –> specifies unique needs of dead/HOH/blibe/Deafvlind chidlren will be better adressed with teh IDEA
Interpretation of IEP and LRE
IEP and LRE are interpreted as placing deaf children in schools with hearing peers rather than deaf peers
James Tucker
Superintendent at maryland school for the deaf + leader in Child first campeign –> proposes that deaf children benefit from learning from deaf peers through shared lanaguges and culture AND that the individual needs of deaf children should be considered first
Deaf education - History
Past - All deaf children were educated in seperate schools + used manual communication + learned english through reading and writing
- Teaching of speech was also provided + chidlren had hearing aids
Manual Vs. Oral use in schools
1817 (begining of deaf education in US) - ASL weas used in first schools for the deaf –> ASL and english were both used + many deaf teachers worked in the schools
Laurent Clerc
Deaf - helped establish more than 30 school for deaf in US after 1817
Deaf teachers in 1817
Deaf teachers knew how to use ASL to bridge to english –> efforts are precursors to ASL/english bilingualism
- Nover found ASL/engkish billigual stradegies for reading and language stradegies - teachers used sign + Fingerspelling + soeech + reaidng + Writting
Oral Schools
Use only spoken methodologies
Estblished by William Bolling and Braidwoon
Closing of oral schools
Oral schools closed in early 1800s due to mismanagments BUT other eroal schools have lasted to this day but some now incorporate ASL and spoken english for teaching
Main method in 1800s
1800s - schools that used ASL dominated in deaf education
Education after intertional congress in MIlan
Milan - hearing dominated council voted top ban use of ASL –> THEN oral education cam back to schools - was adopted in schools for deaf (Especially in the lower grades while sign was only used in upper grades)
When did Oral method stop dominating
ASL was not used much asfter milan UNTIL 1960s - Stokoe’s work recognizing ASL as a language appeared + with WW2 and imporvment in hearing aids
Debate in 1800s
Have oral vs ASL debate between Gallaudet and AGB
AGB = supported spoekn language
Gaullagete grandson = support ASL
Result - As a compromise Gaullaudete developed “combine approach” that used spoken language and ASL
Combined Approach
Used spoken language and ASL - Made by Gauladette grandson
Oral method in 1950s/60s
Oral Methods were noy succeeding as expected –> SO signing was reintroduced into deaf education classroom
Rubella effect on Deafness
Rubella epidemic –> resulted in thousands of deaf children –> Made a dire need for more preschools for deaf children –> ASL was included in Total communication programs BUT the emphisis was on spoken and written english (ASL was called on when child needed more language support)
ASL as children grow older
As children grow older –> they were permitted to use more ASL in class
***Deaf teachers were usually excluded from preschool and elementry school but they were allowed to teach older deaf students because they could communicate better and manage their behavior
What influence deaf education
Early reports that advocated for a return to bilingual education began to infleunce deaf education
Judith Williams
Deaf mom of deaf son –> published a study relating the sons language aquisition with the use of signs + fingerspelling + speechreadiing + auditory training
- Reported that there was a distict advantahe for billugiual aquisition
STUDY WAS AN EYE OPENNER IN THE FEILD
Stockeo recomendation
Followed up Judith’s study by writting a proporsal to president of Gallaudet recobending billigual eductaion –> BUT his proposal on inclduing deaf culture and ASL was ignored
Manual Oral controversy today
NOW - manual/oral controversey continued
Deaf community perspective- there is a war against sign laguange spearheaded by AGB association –> war has been detrimenal to development of deaf chuildren who were not able to succeed with spoken language
Result of war on ASL
Deaf children did not receive early exposure to ASL –> results in cognitive and language deprivation that hampered language developmnet
AGB foundation
Has a history of an uneasy coexistnce with ASL - professional memebers advocate against the use of ASL + implement oral metyhods BUT they issued a statment in support of ASL in 2008 when deaf adults clamored the organization
NOW - foundation continues to collaborate with organizations that support ASL
View in book
Recommend that ASL and deaf culture can provide a supportive framework in education of deaf children
Suggest rasing kid as a ASL english billiguist - ensure sucess for all deaf children because it minimizes risjs and maximizes language learning potential
Basic programs parents can explore
- ASL/English billigual apprach - includes bimodal billugual approaches and monoligual appracges
Billugual approach
Includes ASL/English billuigual program –> Uses ASL as the language of instruction and teaches english as a second language
- English can be taught with print or with spoken lanaguge (spoken language is biomodal approach)
Bimodal Billigual approach
Spoken language + ASL –> focuses on the acquisition and use of visual language and a spken language (in order to support child’s aquisition through vision and stumulates the childs audition through cochlear implants or hearing aids)
- Provides child with models for two languages (ASL and englsih)
Approaches that mix sturctures of ASL and english
Contact signing + manual codes of English + Total communication + Simultenous communication
English sign bimodalism
Catagory of bimodalism expressed in sign supported by speech
Sign Codes of English
Use ASL at word/Lexical level –> means these systems are a part of ASL. even if they do not follow ASL grammar
Monoligial appraches
Include spoken language only
There is overlap between programs – Speech is taught in billigual apprach using spoken lanaguge or taught using sign siupported speech
Methods good for kids with residual hearing
Communication methods that include spoken language are seen as appropriate for kids with residual hearing – recomended that children with cochlear implabts and hearing aids learn ASL because they do not always work in every situation
Method for kids without access to sound
For children who do not have access to sound - the visual language is more beneficial
NOTE - kids who have implants or hearing aids may not fully hear language but may use devices to supoort speech development
Affect of Language Deprivation
Language Deprivation causes delays in learning academic content BUT also having week lanaguge skills can affect thinking, social, and reading skills
What do most deaf adults use
Most Deaf adults in US use 2+ languages (ASL and english) –> because of this many in deaf community support the ASL/english bilingual approach
ASL/english program
ASL and english are the goal – approach consists of teaching english as a second language (reading + writting + spoken language are taught)
ASL/eglish bilingual programming is ised in state schools for deaf + mainstream programs
Fear of ASL/English approach
Parents and professionals may fear approach because they may think that ASL causes spoken language delays BUT there is no reserach that shows that sign hinders speech development + there is no reseracy that shows that ASL/ENglish or total communication programs negelect the teaching of speech and listening skills
Speech in schools for deaf
Speech is part if curriculum in all programs for deaf students
ASL vs. english aquisition
Deaf children often pick up social ASL fast but it may take longer to learn academic ASL
- To learn Academic ASL - they need to be in envirnments with signing deaf adults or older peers
Role of deaf teachers in bilingual programs
Deaf teachers play important role in bilingual programs because they are native signers + are culturale and language models + know how to integrate visual language learning stradegies in classroom
Deaf children of deaf parents vs. hearing parents
Studies show that deaf children of deaf parents had high scores on measures of lanaguge and academics compared to children of hearing parents
***Some schools started to copy the langauage learning situation that deaf parents provide by setting up billigual programs in schools
Bilingual approach in 1990s
1990s- bilingual appraoch was imporved by resercahers who aligned teaching theories and practices with defa children to practices in bilingual literature
IN new approach - the teacher uses ASL as language of intruction and teaches english as a second language
***Bilingualism cannot be set up without careful planning
Language abilities in billigual signs
Signing + attending to signs + reading + wrotting + speacking + listeninf + speechreading + fingerspelling
Resreach on billigual approach
Reserach on bilingual approach is inreasing - studies show the positive cognitive and literacy benefits of early ASL signing with deaf children
STILL NEED STUDIES that measure lenguage acheivment outciomes –> expect to have more stuides shwoing effectivness of billingual approaches as more countries recognize the itiloity of sign languages
Bimodal/Bilingual Apprach
Provides access to spoken english through hearing aids or cochlear implants with the use of ASL - uses Auditory + Visual
Goal - help the child develop visual language + develop spoken language to their capacity
What is used in BB approach
Teacherts can use language immersion where ASL or english is used for extended periods of time OR can use classroom integration where ASL and english can be integrated into one lesson
Deaf people opinion on learning ASL and english
Most families are positive about their deaf children learning both languages
English = survival language – needed for survival and sucess
ASL = cultural langhuage - for comunity and cultural identity