SZ- MOM Antipsychotic drugs Flashcards
How can antipsychotic drugs be taken?
Tablets, syrups or injected
What is the first generation of antipsychotics?
Typical (conventional drugs)
Introduced in 1950’s
Dopamine antagonist
Targeting positive symptoms
What is the second generation of antipsychotics?
Atypical drugs
Developed in 1970’s
Developed to reduce positive and negative symptoms
-Work on multiple neurotransmitters
General information regarding conventional antipsychotic drug?
Been around since 1950s
Taken orally injected or liquid
Not commonly used today
What is a conventional drug?
Chlorpromazine
Conventional- How does chlorpromazine work?
Acts of an antagonist by blocking dopamine receptors within the brain reducing action of neurotransmitters in the mesolimbic pathway
There becomes a build up but then this reduces
Conventional- Chlorpromazine what effects does this have on the body?
Positive symptoms like hallucination
Maximum of 400-800 mg
Conventional- Chlorpromazine side effects?
Sedative
Tardiv dyskinesia
Agitation
Weight gain
Itchy skin
General information regarding atypical?
Developed in 1990s/1970’s
More used today
Atypical- 2 examples?
Clozapine
Risperidone
Atypical- Clozapine how do they work?
Temporarily bind to dopamine receptors by reducing it in the brain
Also works on serotonin and glutamate receptors in order to reduce depression and anxiety symptoms
-300/400 mg
Atypical- Clozapine side effects?
Reduces anxiety and depression
-Lacks white blood cells so can cause weak immune system
-Regular blood tests
Blurred vision.
confusion.
constipation.
dizziness
Atypical- Risperidone how does this work?
Developed in 1990’s can be in tablet, syrup or injected
Binds to dopamine and serotonin receptors temporarily
Very strong so take less with the same effect
Positive and negative symptom
Atypical- Risperidone side effects?
Erectile dysfunction
Constipation
Blurred vision
Evaluation- Cole et al reaserch?
Psychiatry can treat mental illness the same way it can treat physical
-75% of study given conventional had improved and none got worse where as 25% of placebo improved and 48% got worse
Evaluation- why is cole et als research a strength?
Because its supporting research
Its revolutionary and useful when seeking to understand how anti p can be used to modify SZ
How does Noll et al counter cole et als research?
1/3 of the patients didn’t respond to conventional antipsychotics
Evaluation- atypical more effective than conventional: who researched this?
Ravanic et al
Evaluation- atypical more effective than conventional: Ravanic et al?
Compared effectiveness of Clozapine and Chlopromisie and haloperidol in 325 individuals with SZ
Over 5 yrs there were differences in psychometric scores measuring SZ symptoms favoring clozapine, few average effects due to 0.9 averse events
-Halpodril 27 and chlorpromazine 32
Atypical more ideal
Evaluation- atypical more effective than conventional: Ravanic et al counter argument?
Not a ‘one size fits all’ approach
Not all patients find atypical anti psychotics to be more effective at reducing SZ symptoms than conventional
Evaluation- effectiveness non compliance: what is non compliance in SZ patients?
Issue in those with chronic SZ as many individuals lack the necessary insight into own conditions, so don’t have a problem so don’t take medication
Evaluation- effectiveness non compliance: Rettenbacher et al research?
Full compliance in only 54.2% of individuals with SZ partially compliance of 8.3% with SZ and non compliance in 37.5 with SZ
Real world antipsychotics may not be as effective as they have been in closely controlled clinical studies above
Ethical- side effects?
SZ patients can experience Tardive Dyskinesia and Parkinsonism
TD is involuntary muscle movements like tics that’s irreversible
Parkinsonism- shaking (tremors), slow movements and stiffness.
-When antipsychotics are used on SZ patients who are experiencing an acute episode of the disorders so cant consider valid consent
-BUT are the side effects outweigh SZ
Ethical- chemical straight jacket?
This is when we chemically sedate someone that may as well be in a straight jacket due to their controlled and zombie nature
-Have this instead of therapeutic value and curing symptom
-So unethical as they raise the question of what purpose they serve
Ethical- chemical straight jacket researcher?
Szasz
Ethical- chemical straight jacket Szasz?
This method of social control to keep individuals conformist
Ethical- chemical straight jacket counter argument?
Antipsychotics are necessary to keep the SZ patient from harming themselves and others
Social implication- strength?
They pave a pathway for new revolution of care in the community
Social implication evidence?
Lawrie
Social implication Lawrie?
AP drugs revolutionised the core of SZ changing it from an inaccurate condition which required institutionalised to one that treated in the community with potential over independent living and recording
-Links to social revolution beneficial both for patient because they can can lead to more normal lives benefiting society due to cost of being in hospital
Less people in hospital means more to economy