Studies- Exam 1 Flashcards

1
Q

“Red dot” test

A

Sense of self (Children develop ability around 2 yo)

Apes raised with others pass the test, but those raise in isolation do not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

“Yellow snow” test

A

Sense of self (Children develop ability around 2 yo)

Dogs pass

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Redemptive narratives (Dunlop & Tracy, 2013)

A

Self-narratives
Important process and part of being human
-Helps to stay sober

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Power saw study (Nibett & Wilson, 1977)

A

Introspection
Watch movie, half participants had power saw interruption
DV- how much like movie and why

Both groups liked movie EQUALLY!
Interrupted group thought they would have liked it more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mood diary study (Wilson, Laser & Stone, 1982)

A

Introspection
Wrote daily moods and factors the could have effected them (sleep, weather, etc.)

Indicated how much these factors affected them (they were WRONG)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pen study

A

Cultural influences

  • those of western culture more likely to take unique pen
  • eastern culture more likely to take pen from large pile
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Health message framing effects

A

Framing effects

  • > breast cancer study: “benefits of mammography” vs “risk of neglecting mammography” -> detection behavior: negative framing effect
  • > flu prevention: positive is better
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hartorf & Cantril (1954) Princeton-Dartmouth game

A

Assimilation

Each team said that other was cheating and failed to see faults of own team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rosenhan and colleagues (1973) sane in insane places

A

Assimilation

Workers saw normal habits of normal people as psychotic because in institution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Darley & Gross (1983) Expectations of affluence

A

Confirmation bias
Descriptions of girl differed, same video of her intelligence test; those with poorer description rated as more hesitant, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Ross & Lepper (1979) Capital punishment study

A

Confirmation bias

Exact same evidence, but supported preconception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Rosenthal’s teacher study

A

Self-fulfilling prophecy

“Smart” students treated better, given more time/attention, etc. -> smarter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Snyder, Tanke, & Berscheid (1977) Self-fulfilling prophecy of attractiveness

A

Self-fulfilling prophecy

  • men interact with women over intercom (no sight, but have folder with supposed pic and description- only pic varied)
  • > participants rated the more attractive pictured women as warmer and friendlier (halo effect)
  • > third party voted their voices and they actually were warmer and friendlier, cause all by how the man interacted with her
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Andersen et al. (1980) Firefighter study

A

Belief perseverance

  • half told being a risk takes makes for better firefighter, other half told opposite
  • > debriefed, then asked their own belief, and agreed with what they were told, even after informed that it was completely false
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Exam study (Shepperd, Ouellette, Fernandez, 1996)

A

Bracing for the worst

  • overly optimistic 1 month before
  • just above actual results 5 days and 50 min before
  • 3 sec before feedback, very pessimistic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Peterson & Seligman

A

Explanatory styles

A person’s habitual way of explaining events

17
Q

Marital chores study

A

Self-serving attributional bias

-when add up the percent of chores each says they do, comes to over 100%

18
Q

Ross, Amabile, & Steinmetz (1997) Quiz show study

A

Fundamental attribution error

  • participants and those watching were asked how smart host was compared to other participants
  • > failed to account for the fact that the answers were in his hands
19
Q

Jones & Harris (1967) Pro-Castro or Anti-Castro essays

A

Fundamental attribution error
-regardless of assigned or chose freely, participants who read them thought that authors truly believed the side they were arguing for

20
Q

Lapiere (1934)

A

First study to demonstrate inconsistency between attitudes and behaviors

  • LaPiere and friends were turned away once out of 250 establishments
  • When asked 6 monte later, 92% of same establishments said they would not serve someone who was Chinese
21
Q

Wicker (1969)

A

Reviewed literature and concluded no attitude-behavior consistency

22
Q

Peg turn study (Festinger & Carlsmith, 1959)

A

Insufficient justification

  1. Turn a peg a quarter for an hour
  2. Asks participant to tell next in like how exciting it was
    - > half paid $1 (enjoyed more) other half paid $20 (enjoyed less)
23
Q

Brehm (1956)

A

Post-decision dissonance
First published dissonance experiment
Studied post-decisional change in the ranking of products
Found spreading of alternative: the things they chose was later ranked significantly higher than the thing they did not choose

24
Q

Fazio, Effrein, & Falender (1981)- introverted/ extroverted study on self-perception

A

Self-perception theory

  • leading questions to make them seem intro/extroverted
  • > may move them a bit up or down from original on the scale, depending on the questions they were given
25
Q

Greene, Sternberg, & Lepper (1976) Examined kids’ interest in a task and how they were rewarded

A

Overjustification effects

  • class of kids, educational games
  • > 1/2 rewarded -> play more, when taken away show no interest