Exam 3- Lecture 11 Flashcards

1
Q

Prosocial behavior

A

Any act designed to help others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Altruism

A

Unselfish behavior that benefits others WITHOUT REGARD to consequences for oneself

Ongoing debate about the existence of “true altruism”
-helps society run smoothly, seems unrealistic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What motivates prosocial behavior?

A

Social rewards
-esteem and respect, status, praise

Personal distress
-watching someone suffer causes distress (empathy)

Empathic concern
-identifying with someone in need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Social rewards

A

Motivates prosocial behavior

Esteem and respect, status, praise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Personal distress

A

Motivates prosocial behavior

Watching someone suffer causes distress (empathy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Negative state relief hypothesis

A

Personal distress
Give help in order to get out of bad mood

  • if give ppl another way to feel better, not as likely to help
  • if believe helping WON’T make them feel better, NOT as likely to help

Kids DON’T know this yet
-learn around 7 or 8

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Empathic concern

A

Motivates prosocial behavior

Identifying with someone in need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Happiness motive for helping

A

It feels good

Dunn’s research on selfish vs. prosocial spending
-feel better when spend on other than spend on self

We help more when we’re in a GOOD mood, in part to maintain it

  • Quarters in pay phones study
  • > found money or not, those who found were more likely to help when someone dropped papers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Natural selection motive for helping

A

Evolution makes us do it

Kin-selection
-more likely to help people who share our genes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Reciprocity motive for helping

A

We might get something in return

Might explain what we help non-kin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Decision-making model for helping behavior (Darley & Latane)

5 steps for helping

A
  1. Notice the event (that someone is in need)
    - “Smoke in the test room” study (Latane & Darley, 1968)
  2. Interpret event as emergency (ambiguity diminishes helping behavior – pluralistic ignorance)
    - Married vs. stranger study
  3. Take responsibility for helping (Bystander effect)
    - Seizure study (Darley & Latane)
  4. Must know how to give help
  5. Must decide to help (rewards vs. costs- Social exchange theory)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Decision-making model for helping behavior

1. Notice the event

A

We will not help unless we first notice that someone is in need

“Smoke in the test room” study (Latane & Darley, 1968)
-participants fill out fake questionnaire
-emergency staged (smoke)
Results:
-participant alone: notice under 5s
-with others: notice in 20s (really focus on questionnaire)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Decision-making model for helping behavior

2. Interpret event as emergency

A

Ambiguity diminishes helping behavior

Pluralistic ignorance
-we assume that when other ppl appear unconcerned in an ambiguous situation the situation is not an emergency

Married vs. stranger study

  • staged physical fight (pushing/shoving)
  • “I don’t know you” (65% of time, stranger helped) or “don’t know why married you” (19% of time, stranger intervened)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Decision-making model for helping behavior

3. Take responsibility for helping

A

Even if it is clear that an event is an emergency, ppl may not help if others are around

Bystander effect
Greater the # of bystanders who witness an emergency, the LESS LIKELY anyone of them is to help
-because diffusion of responsibility (bystander and social loafing)
--> Seizure study (Darley & Latane)
-participant on phone with another
Conditions
-just one other (85%; 52s to alert)
-two other ppl (62%; 93s)
-six total (31%: 166s)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Decision-making model for helping behavior

4. Must know how to give help

A

People cannot help if they don’t know how

e.g., knowing CPR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Decision-making model for helping behavior

5. Must decide to help

A

Weight REWARDS and COSTS

Social exchange theory
-ppl take rewards and costs into account when deciding whether to help

We are more likely to help with rewards OUTWEIGH costs

Rewards include benefits to other person

17
Q

Good Samaritan Study (Darley & Batson, 1973)

A

Seminary students asked to give a lecture on Good Samaritan OR on some other topic

Half told late and to hurry

Who helped?

  • if early, 65% helped
  • if on time, 40% helped
  • if late, only 10% helped

Topic of lecture made NO difference

Cost-benefit

18
Q

Just learning about steps toward helping

A

increases ppl’s tendency to help and decreases pluralistic ignorance and bystander effect!