Exam 3- Lecture 11 Flashcards
Prosocial behavior
Any act designed to help others
Altruism
Unselfish behavior that benefits others WITHOUT REGARD to consequences for oneself
Ongoing debate about the existence of “true altruism”
-helps society run smoothly, seems unrealistic
What motivates prosocial behavior?
Social rewards
-esteem and respect, status, praise
Personal distress
-watching someone suffer causes distress (empathy)
Empathic concern
-identifying with someone in need
Social rewards
Motivates prosocial behavior
Esteem and respect, status, praise
Personal distress
Motivates prosocial behavior
Watching someone suffer causes distress (empathy)
Negative state relief hypothesis
Personal distress
Give help in order to get out of bad mood
- if give ppl another way to feel better, not as likely to help
- if believe helping WON’T make them feel better, NOT as likely to help
Kids DON’T know this yet
-learn around 7 or 8
Empathic concern
Motivates prosocial behavior
Identifying with someone in need
Happiness motive for helping
It feels good
Dunn’s research on selfish vs. prosocial spending
-feel better when spend on other than spend on self
We help more when we’re in a GOOD mood, in part to maintain it
- Quarters in pay phones study
- > found money or not, those who found were more likely to help when someone dropped papers
Natural selection motive for helping
Evolution makes us do it
Kin-selection
-more likely to help people who share our genes
Reciprocity motive for helping
We might get something in return
Might explain what we help non-kin
Decision-making model for helping behavior (Darley & Latane)
5 steps for helping
- Notice the event (that someone is in need)
- “Smoke in the test room” study (Latane & Darley, 1968) - Interpret event as emergency (ambiguity diminishes helping behavior – pluralistic ignorance)
- Married vs. stranger study - Take responsibility for helping (Bystander effect)
- Seizure study (Darley & Latane) - Must know how to give help
- Must decide to help (rewards vs. costs- Social exchange theory)
Decision-making model for helping behavior
1. Notice the event
We will not help unless we first notice that someone is in need
“Smoke in the test room” study (Latane & Darley, 1968)
-participants fill out fake questionnaire
-emergency staged (smoke)
Results:
-participant alone: notice under 5s
-with others: notice in 20s (really focus on questionnaire)
Decision-making model for helping behavior
2. Interpret event as emergency
Ambiguity diminishes helping behavior
Pluralistic ignorance
-we assume that when other ppl appear unconcerned in an ambiguous situation the situation is not an emergency
Married vs. stranger study
- staged physical fight (pushing/shoving)
- “I don’t know you” (65% of time, stranger helped) or “don’t know why married you” (19% of time, stranger intervened)
Decision-making model for helping behavior
3. Take responsibility for helping
Even if it is clear that an event is an emergency, ppl may not help if others are around
Bystander effect Greater the # of bystanders who witness an emergency, the LESS LIKELY anyone of them is to help -because diffusion of responsibility (bystander and social loafing) --> Seizure study (Darley & Latane) -participant on phone with another Conditions -just one other (85%; 52s to alert) -two other ppl (62%; 93s) -six total (31%: 166s)
Decision-making model for helping behavior
4. Must know how to give help
People cannot help if they don’t know how
e.g., knowing CPR