social influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is conformity

A

change in a persons behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the 3 types of conformity

A

internalisation, identification, compliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is internalisation

A

individual will conform publically and privately because they have internalised and accepted the views of the majority group
- deepest form of conformity
- permanent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is identification

A

act same as majority group because we share their beliefs and want to fit in
- temporary
- agree publically but not privately
- value the group stance
- moderate level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is compliance

A

going along with others
- shallowest form of conformity
- follow people in public but privately do not agree
- don not change their personal opinions
- superficial change
- opinion will stop as soon as the group pressure stops

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

normative social influence (NSI)

A

need to be liked
- gaining approval
- may not agree but do it anyway
- occurs in non ambiguous situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

informational social influence ISI

A

need to be right
- believe majority group have more info than you do
- look for guidance, want to be correct so you follow them
- look to majority
- ambiguous situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

sherif 1935

A

SUPPORTS ISI
aim- to investigate whether people are influenced by others
- ambiguous task
- autokinetic effect used where still point of light in the dark appears to move
- participants shown still point of light in the dark and estimate how far it moved, first on their own then in groups
- lab experiment
- repeated measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

findings of sherif (1935)

A
  • when alone, participants developed their own stable estimates (personal norms)
  • in the groups, judgements gradually became closer and closer until a group norm developed
  • participants were influenced by the estimates of other people.
  • estimates converged because participants used info from others to help them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

lucas et al 2006

A

support for ISI
- asked students to give answers to math problems that were easy or more difficult
- greater conformity to incorrect answers that were more difficult
- most true for students who rated their mathematical skills as poor
- people conform in situations where they dont know the answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

criticisms of informational social influence (ISI)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

criticisms of NSI and ISI

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

asch’s study

A
  • unambiguous- obvious answers
  • showed participants 2 cards at the same time, one had a standard line and the other had 3 comparison lines
  • on of the 3 lines was always the same length snd the others competely different (wrong)
  • 123 male american undergraduates
  • 1 real particpant in a group with 6 confederates
  • 18 trials
  • first 6 trials confederates gave correct answer so participant wouldnt guess the saim of the experiment
  • next 12 trials they gave teh wrong answers
  • was a control group who always gave correct answrs

NORMATIVE SOCIAL INFLUENCE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

asch 1951 findings

A
  • particiapant gave teh wrong answer 37% of the time
  • 25% of participants did not conform on any trials meaning 75% did at least once
  • asch effect- extent to which participants conform even when the situation is non ambiguous
  • participants interviewed- majority said they conformed to avoid rejection
  • control group, 1% innacurate response
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why did they conform

A
  • to fit in with the majority group
  • fear of standing out
  • suffer from eye strain or bad eyesight
  • distortion of action- didnt want to stand out so conformed to group publically but not privately
  • distoertion of judgement - doubted their accuracy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

who was aschs experimented carried out on

A

science and engineering students- 25 years later
- 1 out of 396 conformed
- higher intelligence levels
- time temporal validity
youths on probation
- simlar results to asch
- afraid of getting into trouble

17
Q

what is temporal validity

A

when results of study generalise across times

18
Q

evaluation of aschs study

A
  • temporal validity
  • artificial and situational task
  • limited application of findings
19
Q

how would group size influence conformity

A
  • 3 confederated conformity to wrong answer rose to 31.8%
  • addition of further confederates had little difference
20
Q

how would unanimity influence conformity

A
  • introduced confederate who disagreed with others- sometimes gave correct answer sometimes gave a different wrong answer
21
Q

how would task difficulty influence conformity

A

asch made lines more simlar in length
- conformity increased when teh lines were more similar
- ISI occurs- need to be right
- fear of being wrong so look to other people for guidance

22
Q

what is a social role

A

behaviours expected of an individual based on society who occupies a given social position of status
e.g. a fireman, police officer etc

23
Q

what is conformity to a social role

A

extent to which people behave in the expected

24
Q

zimbardo stanford prison experiment - 1971

A

aim was to know how good people would act in a bad situation
procedure:
- mock prison set up (basement of stanford uni)
- 70 volunteers selected, 24 put through screening
- onlu emotionally stable
- randomly assigned roles of prisoners and guards
- arrested in their own homes, blindfolded, strip searched, given number and uniform
- meant to last 2 weeks, ended on day 6
- guards had own uniform and full control over prisoner, we=ore reflective glasses
- zimbardo was prison superintendent —> investigator effect

25
Q

findnigs of zimbardo stanford experiment

A
  • guards fully invested in the role
  • took inspiration from a famous movie
  • guards becama a threat mentally and physically
  • 3 prisoners left early
  • one went on a hunger strike

conclusion:
- power of situation influences peoples behaviour
- guards, prisoners + researchers conformed well

26
Q

strengths of zimbardo stanford experiment

A
  • some control over variables
  • emotionally stable individuals
  • high internal validity
27
Q

weaknesses of zimbardo stanford experiment

A
  • participants play acting rather than conforming
  • zimbardo as superintendent didnt care for participants in real life