Social Influence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is conformity?

A

A type of social influence involving a change in belief or behaviour in order to fit in with a group. This change is in response to real or imagined social pressure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Normative Social Influence?

A

When people confirm due to a need to be accepted and be liked. It’s an emotional process.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Informational social Influence?

A

And explanation for conformity where we agree with the majority as we believe they are correct or that they are more knowledgeable. Occurs mainly in situations that are new to us.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the three types of conformity?

A

Compliance, identification and internalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is compliance?

A

Going along with others but not changing internal thoughts or beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is identification?

A

A person changes external behaviour and internal beliefs when in the presence of a certain group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is internalisation?

A

When a person genuinely accepts the groups norms in both public and private

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are two strengths of the ‘two process theory’ (NSI and ISI)?

A

S- supporting evidence- Lucas et al (2006) proved there was greater conformity when students were presented with a harder maths problem than an easy one

S- supporting evidence- Asch (1951) found that students admitted to sometimes conforming and giving the wrong answer instead of the right one they knew was correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are two limitations of the two-process theory?

A

L- doesn’t take into account people’s thoughts- NSI doesn’t effect people who don’t care about being liked as much as ‘naffiliators’

L- both processes work together- theory only says they work separately which is incorrect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What were the findings of Asch’s research?

A

-a wrong answer was given 36.8% of the time by the naive participant
- 75% of participants confirmed at least once
-most said they confirmed to avoid social rejection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What two things did Asch find increased conformity

A

Group size, task difficulty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Asch find that decreased conformity

A

Unanimity- one confederate would say the right answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are two strengths of Asch’s study?

A

S- supporting evidence- Lucas et al (2006) showed students confirmed more when faced with a harder maths problem

S- real world application- helps us to understand conformity so can limit the effect of mindless destructive conformity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are two limitations of Asch's study of conformity?

A

L- not generalisable- Asch only tested on middle class white males from the USA, Neto (1995) suggested woman may be more conformist.

L-contradictory evidence- Perrin and Spender (1980) showed 1 in 396 British engineering students conformed. Which shows differences across professions and cultures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a social role?

A

The ‘part’ we play as a member of a social group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are two strengths of zimbardo’s prison experiment?

A

S-high internal validity- Z selected physically and mentally sound participants and assigned them randomly

S-high mundane realism- 90% of the conversations recorded in the study were about Prison life, prisoner 416 said ‘the prison was a real one run by psychologists rather than the government’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are two limitations of Zimabrdo’s study?

A

L- ethical issues- highly stressful for participants and had to be called off after 5 days and one participant went on hunger strike. This was due to Zimabrdos ‘dual role’ part.

L- can be argued that participants were okay acting- one officer admitted to basing his role off a character from ‘Cool hand Luke’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What were the findings of Milgrim’s study?

A

65% of people went all the way to 450v

Teacher more likely to continue when told they weren’t responsible

No participant stopped before 300v

12.5% stopped at 300 labelled ‘intense shock’ in red

3 participants had seizures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are two strengths of Milgrim’s study?

A

S- supporting evidence- Sheridan and King (1972) did the same experiment with puppies and 54% of men and 100% of woman delivered the maximum shock.

S- highly controlled- lab study so very controlled but no demand characteristics as the fact it was in a lab was key to finding (authority)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are two limitations of Milgrim’s study?

A

L-ethical issues- milgrim deceived participants and caused severe distress. 3 had seizures.

L- lacks internal validity- some participants guessed shock was fake (Orne and Holland 1968)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the agentic state?

A

When people see someone as having higher authority than them so they act as an ‘agent’ for them despite moral strain as we feel we are simply following orders and are powerless as we are in a lower social position in the hierarchy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What are two examples of the agentic state?

A

Nazis and Abu Ghraib prison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are two strengths if the agentic state?

A

S-supporting evidence- Blass and Schmidt found that people thought the experimenter was at fault in the participants in Milgrim’s study

S-can be seen in the real world- explains the holocaust and the my Lai massacre etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the authoritarian personality?

A

When a person adheres strictly to rules and follows conventional values and complete obedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is used to measure facism?

A

The f scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What were the findings from Adorno’s f-scale?

A

Done by 2000 white middle-class Americans.

Those who scored more highly were more obedient and showed submissiveness and respect, they believe society needs strong leadership.

they also identified with those who were 'strong' and showed contempt for the weak- link to prejudice and conventional attitudes towards gender sex race etc

see society as deteriorating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Where does an authoritarian personality come from?

A

Harsh parenting and conditional love

Child builds up resentment but cannot unleash it on parents so displaces it onto others who they see as weaker 'scapegoating'

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is a strength of the authoritarian personality?

A

Milgram interviewed 40 of his past participants and the ones who complied scored much higher on the f scale than those who didn’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What are two limitations of the authoritarian personality?

A

L- the f scale doesn’t show right wing tendencies- it shows RW and LW ideaologies as they both believe in strong leadership.

L- contradictory evidence- millions of people supported Hitler but they can’t have all been authoritarian

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What is meant by resistance to social influence?

A

The ability of people to withstand the social pressure to conform to the majority or to obey the authority. Resistance is influenced by both situational and dispositional factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What are the two types of resistance to social influence

A

Social support

Locus of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is social support

A

Asch found that the presence of another non-confirmed dropped conformity to 5%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What is locus of control?

A

Refers to the sense we each have about what directs events in our lives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What do internals believe (locus of control)

A

That they are responsible for what happens to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What do externals believe (locus of control)

A

That it’s luck and external factors that effect their lives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Who are more likely to conform? Externals or internals?

A

Externals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What are two strengths of social support as an explanation of resistance

A

Albrecht (2006) started a program to stop adolescent mothers smoking and gave some a ‘buddy’ and some didn’t. T he ones with buddies were less likely to smoke

Conformity dropped to 5% when Asch provided a non conformist confederate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What is a strength for locus of control

A

Holland 1967 showed 37% of internals didn’t continue to the highest voltage in Milgrim’s study whereas 23% of externals did not continue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What is a limitation of locus of control?

A

Twenge (2004) analysed data from 1960-2002 which showed over time people have become more resistant to obedience but also more external

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What is minority influence?

A

Refers to a situation where one person or a small group of people influece the behaviour and beliefs of the majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What three things did Moscovici say a minority influece group needed to be more successful

A

Consistency

Commitment

Flexibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What is consistency

A

Diachronic- consistency over time- the group doesn’t change its views

Synchronic- all minority group members agree and back each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What is commitment

A

Doing extreme things, this is called the augmentation principle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

What is flexibity

A

The minority groups come to a compromise to get their views across

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What are two strengths of minority influence

A

S- Wood (1994) analysed over 100 studies similar to the one done by moscovici and found that consistency was a major factor in minority influence

S- Martin (2003) found that people were less willing to change their opinions if they listened to a minority group agree before faced with a contradictory view compared to a majority group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What is a limitation of minority influence

A

L- artificial stimuli- eg identifying the colour of a slide. Shows a lack of mundane realism and external validity so it doesn’t tell us how MI works in the real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Outline Moscovici’s experiment

A

-participants given eye tests to make sure they weren’t colourblind
-two groups of 6: 4 participants and 2 confederate
-were shown 36 blue slides
-one group the confederates said all 36 slides were green
-other group said 24/36 slides were green


-more consistent group got 8.42% of the majority to conform
-less consistent group got 1.25% of the majority to conform

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

What are the 6 steps that occur when a minority makes social change

A

1) drawing attention- campaigns marches etc

2)consistency - consistent message

3)deeper processing- majority start to think about message

4)the augmentation principle- do extreme things

5)the snowball effect- more people join the movement

6)social cryptomnesia- people accept the message but forget where it came from

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

What is minority influence based on?

A

ISI

Internalisation

50
Q

What are two strengths of MI and social change

A

S- supporting evidence- Nolan (2008) found group 1 who were told that everyone else in their neighbourhood were trying to reduce their energy, reduced their energy usage more than those in group 2 who were simply asked to reduce energy.

S- supporting evidence- Bashir (2013) found people would resist social change even when they agreed as the didn’t was a label such as ‘tree hugger’ or ‘man hater’ showing that social cryptomnesia is necessary

51
Q

What are two limitations of MI and social change

A

L- Nemeth (1968) argues the effect of MI on social change is indirect and delayed. For example took ages to change attitudes towards drink-driving and smoking.

L- Moscovici showed that he thought MI groups made people think more deeply than majority groups. Mackie (1987) disagrees and says it’s the other may around

52
Q

how did group size effect conformity in Asch's experiment

A

when group became 3 or larger conformity was at 31.8%

the optimal amount of people for conformity was 7 and then after that it decreased

53
Q

how did unanimity effect conformity in Asch's experiment

A

when there was one confederate who said the right answer conformity dropped to 5%

54
Q

how did task difficulty effect Asch's research into conformity

A

increased- ISI

55
Q

what is dispositional hypothesis in regards to prisons

A

guards and prisoners were 'bad seeds'- bad conditions was due to bad nature of people in prisons

56
Q

what is situational hypothesis in regards to prison

A

brutality is due to the environment the prisoners are in

57
Q

outline Zimbardo's prison experiment

A

set up mock prison in basement of Stanford

volunteer sample for students, did psychological testing to ensure all were 'emotionally stable'

participants who were selected randomly allocated to be guards or prisoners

prisoners were given a smock and cap to cover their hair- guards were given uniform, handcuffs, wooden bat and mirrored sunglasses. prisoners were always called by a number not name- these factors created deindividuation

guards given complete power

if prisoners wanted to leave they had to apply for parole with superintendent Zimabrdo

58
Q

what were the findings of Zimbardo's experiment

A

guards took to roles with enthusiasm

abandoned after 6 days

guards often tormented and abused prisoners- headcount in middle of night, reminding them they had control etc

rebellion after 2 days by prisoners- guards suppressed it with fire extinguishers

after rebellion prisoners were subdued and anxious

one prisoner released on first day after showing psychological disturbance

prisoner 819 went on hunger strike and was force fed put in the hole and shunned by other prisoners

two more prisoners left on fourth day

59
Q

what are real world example that supports zimbardo's findings

A

Abu Ghraib prison- US officials tortured harassed and killed prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003- when in court said they had been told to do it

60
Q

what is obedience

A

when an individual acts in response to a direct order usually from an authority figure. assumed that without this order the person would not have acted in this way

61
Q

what was the procedure of Milgram's experiment

A

40 males aged from 20-50

naive participant was teacher and had to ask student questions and if they got it wrong would shock them

shock would go up 15v at a time

at 180v the student would shout

at 300v the student screamed and said his heart was bothering him

at 315v the student would refuse to continue and not say anything

the 450v button had a label saying 'danger- severe shock- xxx

researcher would use standardised prods like 'please continue' or 'you have no other choice, please go on'

62
Q

what effect did moving location to seedy offices have on Milgram's study

A

obedience dropped to 47.5%

63
Q

what effect did making the teacher and learner be in the same room (proximity) have on Milgram's study

A

obedience dropped to 40%

64
Q

what effect did making the teacher have to force the learners hand onto shock plate (touch proximity) have on Milgram's study

A

obedience dropped to 30%

65
Q

what effect did having the researcher give instructions to teacher by phone have on Milgram's study

A

obedience decreased to 20.5%

66
Q

what effect did having the reasearcher get called away for a phone call and a member of the public taking over in everyday clothes (uniform) have on Milgram's study

A

obedience decreased to 20%

67
Q

what is the autonomous state

A

when we are independent and have free will

68
Q

what is an agent shift

A

when an authority figure comes along and we move from autonomous to agentic state

69
Q

why do people stay in an agent state even when they don't want to

A

binding factors- these reduce moral strain and make it seem like what they do is okay.

70
Q

what are two limitations of the agentic state

A

contradictory evidence- Mandel described German reserve police battalion as shooting and killing civilians in a small town in Poland despite not receiving orders to do so

contradictory evidence- the nurses in Holfing's study should have shown moral strain as seen in Milgram's experiment but they did not

over simplified- does not show why some people do not conform to hierarchy-

71
Q

what was Holfing's study

A

got doctors to get nurses to administer a possibly fatal dose of a drug to patients

21/22 nurses obeyed

72
Q

what is a dispositional explanation of obedience

A

some humans are more likely to be obedient than others

73
Q

what is an example of a dispositional theory for obedience

A

authoritarian personality

74
Q

how does social support affect conformity

A

Asch found that it significantly decreased it

75
Q

how does social support affect obedience

A

individuals can become more confident in their ability to resist when they have a 'disobedient role model'

Milgram found that obedience dropped from 65-10% when the teacher was joined by another disobedient confederate

76
Q

what are characteristics of an internal locus of control

A

high level of responsibility and control over their lives

77
Q

what are characteristics of an external locus of control

A

believe their life is determined by external factors they cannot change

78
Q

how does an internal locus of control relate to social influence

A

high internals likely to seek out information about their own lives themselves and will not conform with others

79
Q

how does an external locus of control relate to social influence

A

more likely to be influenced by others as they don't believe they have control over their lives

80
Q

what is diachronic consistency

A

consistency over time- the minority group doesn't change its views

81
Q

what is synchronic consistency

A

consistency between members- all minority group members agree and back each other

82
Q

What are strengths of Milgram's situational variables

A

supporting evidence- Bickman had three people dressed in a milkmans uniform, a security guards uniform and a suit to tell passers by in NY to do tasks such as pick up litter- found people twice as likely to listen to security guard than suit, shows importance of uniform

highly controlled- Only altered one variable at a time and kept all other variables the same and repeated with over 1000 participants. shows procedure is standardised and therefore easily replicated and also has high internal validity

83
Q

what are two limitations of Milgram's situational variables

A

lack internal validity- Orne and Holland said that Milgram's research was easily discovered to be fake by participants. This can especially be seen in uniform change as researcher replaced by regular person, Milgram agreed the situation was highly contrived. demand characteristics more of a problem so results may not be genuine

culture bias- Milgram's study replicated in showed 90% obedience in Spain, shows doesn't just apply to America. however all follow up research done in west so may apply to only western individualistic cultures. only two studies done outside of west from 1968-85 (Jordan and India)

84
Q

what research shows Asch's experiment was over-simplified (AO3)

A

Lucas et al found those more confident in maths ability conformed less- shows Asch was oversimplified as didn't look at the individual factors

85
Q

why can zimbardos study be seen to lack realism (AO3)

A

Banuazizi and Movahedi say that participants were over- acting

one guard based personality off cool hand Luke

86
Q

what real situation shows support for zimbardo's experiment (AO3)

A

Abu Ghraib

87
Q

what are examples of supporting evidence for milligram's study (AO3)

A

Le jeu de la mort- 80% obedience

Sheridan and king- 54% and 100% obedience with real shocks

88
Q

what evidence shows milligrams study lacked realism (AO3)

A

Perry listened back to recordings of experiment and concluded 50% of participants knew it was fake

89
Q

what is a contrary theory as to why people obeyed in milligrams experiment (AO3)

A

Social identity theory- people only reacted to prods about experiment which they identified with but didbnt obey prods about blindly following authority

90
Q

what cognitive style do this with the authoritarian personality have

A

black and white

91
Q

what is contradictory view to authoritarian personality (AO3)

A

Social identity theory- people identify with a state not an individual- nazi Germany and anti-semitism as an example

92
Q

what shows the poor internal validity of the f scale (AO3)

A

Greenstein- 'a comedy of methodological errors"

93
Q

who suggested the three types of conformity

A

Herbert Kelman

94
Q

what are the three types of conformity

A

internalisation

identification

compliance

95
Q

what is internalisation

A

when a person genuinely accepts the norms of the group publicly and privately. attitudes change permanently because the views become a part of their thought processes. attitudes same when not in the presence of group members

96
Q

what is identification

A

conforming because there is something in the group you value. change public but not private beliefs.

97
Q

what is compliance

A

superficial change- 'going along with others' in public but not changing private beliefs.

98
Q

who put forward the two process model for conformity (ISI, NSI)

A

Deutch and Gerard

99
Q

what did Deutsch and Gerard say the two human needs were

A

to be right

to be liked

100
Q

describe ISI

A

conforming with the majority as you assume they are more knowledgable

cognitive process

happens more in ambiguous situations or situations of crisis

leads to internalisation

101
Q

describe NSI

A

about the 'norms' of a group

about gaining social approval

emotional process

leads to temporary change in beliefs (compliance)

more likely to occur around strangers and in stressful situations

102
Q

what is the strengths of NSI

A

supporting evidence- Asch interviewed participants most said they conformed as they felt self conscious and were afraid of disapproval. conformity dropped to 12.5% when answers were written down

103
Q

what are the limitations of NSI

A

overly simplistic- NSI does not effect everyone in the same ways. nAffiliators are more concerned with being liked. Mcghee and Teevan found that students who were nAffiliators were more likelynto conform.

104
Q

what are the strengths of ISI

A

supporting evidence- Lucas et al

105
Q

what is the limitation for ISI

A

hard to see difference in ISI and NSI- conformity dropped when unanimity introduced. could be reducing ISI or NSI

106
Q

describe legitimacy of authority

A

when a person is widely viewed by society as having authority which makes it legitimate.

people give up their independence to hand control to a figure who will use authority appropriately

this is learnt from parents teachers etc in childhood.

107
Q

what is a strength of the agentic state.

A

supporting evidence- in milligrams study participants often asked questions or resisted shocks. one question was 'who is responsible if mr Wallace is harmed' when researcher said himself he continued

108
Q

what is a imitation of the agentic state

A

contradictory evidence - Rank and Cardell found 16 of 18 nurses refused to administer lethal dose of drug when told to by doctor.

109
Q

what is a strength of the legitimacy of authority

A

explains cultural differences- Milgram replications- 16% in Australia, 85% in Germany.

110
Q

what is a limitation of legitimacy of authority

A

contrasting evidence- Rank and Jacobson nurses, some didn't go on in milgrams

111
Q

what are the strengths of social support

A

RWA- Albrecht smoking buddy study

supporting evidence- milligram variation- obedience at 10% when dissenting peer with teacher

supporting evidence- Gamson found when told students to find evidence to help oil company run smear campaign 29 of 33 groups resisted, this would be because they were in groups

112
Q

what is the LOC continuum

A

scale to measure LOC

high internal at one end high external at the other

113
Q

what characteristics do high internals have (LOC)

A

more self confident

more achievement orientated

higher intelligence

114
Q

what is a strength of LOC

A

holland did milligram experiment and measured LOC. found 37% internals didn't continue compared to 23% of externals.

115
Q

what is a limitation of LOC

A

twinge looked at LOC studies over 40 years and found over time people became more e3xternal but more obedient

116
Q

what are the strengths of minority influence

A

supporting evidence- Wood did meta analysis on 100 moscovici type studies and found the more consistent the more effective

supporting evidence- Martin supported deeper processing as found people were less likely to change their opinion on something which has been told to them by a minority group compared to a majority group.

117
Q

what are the weaknesses of minority influence

A

low munbdance realism- slides

118
Q

what was the results of moscovicis experiment

A

8% when consistent (24/24)

1.25% when not (12/24)

119
Q

what are the strengths of social change

A

supporting evidence- Nolan found that in San Diego people were more likely to reduce energy usage if posters in their neighbourhood that most people were trying to reduce energy usage compared to posters that just told them to reduce energy usage.

explains change- nemeth argues that minorities inspire divergent thinking which is a broad type of thinking where more options are weighed up and this leads to better decisions and more creative ideas. shows the value of minority in opening the minds of people.

120
Q

what are the weaknesses of minority influence

A

contrasting evidence- fox croft reviewed 70 studies using NSI to decrease student drinking. there was no change in frequency and only a small change in quantity.

121
Q

what role does NSI play in social change

A

when groups provide info on what others are doing in their campaign

for example 'stop smoking- others are'

122
Q

what did zimbardo suggest helped social change

A

gradual commitment