Memory Flashcards

1
Q

What is a memory?

A

Refers to the processes that are used to acquire, store, retain and then retrieve information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of coding?

A

The format in which information is stored in the various memory stores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the definition of capacity?

A

The amount of information that can be held in a memory store

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the definition of duration?

A

The length of time that information can be held in the memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was Jacob’s study?

A

.Jacobs was measuring the digit span of a persons memory.
.The researcher read out 4 digits and the participant had to repeat them back out loud to the researcher. If they got them correct then the researcher would read out 5,6,7 etc until the person failed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the findings from Jacob’s study?

A

.Mean digit span-9.3
.Mean letter span-7.3

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a strength of Jacobs study?

A

Even though it was carried out in 1887, latter research has proved Jacob’s findings to be correct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a limitation of Jacob’s study?

A

Findings may lack validity as he didn’t take into account factors such as age (8 years-6.6 digits. 19 years-8.6 digits)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was miller’s study?

A

Muller claimed the STM could hold 7+-2 pieces of information.

He said that by ‘chunking’ long numbers into short pieces they would be easier to recall (phone numbers etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a strength of Miller’s study?

A

None

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are limitations of millers study?

A

Cowan (2001) showed that the capacity of the STM was 4 chunks of info

Simon(1974) showed the STM could hold 5 chunks of information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What’s is the capacity of the STM

A

9.3 digits and 7.3 letters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the capacity of the LTM

A

Limitless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was Peterson and Peterson’s study?

A

They have 24 undergraduate students a consonant trigram (CVC) to remember and a random 3 digit number to count back from for 3,6,12,15,18 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the findings of Peterson and Peyerson’s study?

A

Correct recall after 3 seconds- 80%
Correct recall after 6 seconds- 50%
Correct recall after 18 seconds- 3%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a strength of Peterson and Petersons study?

A

Good ‘generalisability’ - We do have to try to remember some ‘meaningless’ things in life such as phone numbers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What’s a limitation of Peterson and Petersons study?

A

Lacks ‘mundane realism’- the information that the students were asked to recall was ‘artificial’ and does not show him memory works in the real world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was Bahricks study?

A

A longitudinal study where he got 392 Americans between the ages of 17 and 74 to remember high school classmates through free recall and identifying photos.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What were the results of bahricks study?

A

Photo recognition:
.90% accurate within 15 years
.70% accurate after 48 years

Free recall
.60% accurate within 15 years
.30% accurate after 48 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is a strength of bahricks study?

A

High mundane realism- a meaningful stimuli was used that reflects how memory works irl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is a limitation of bahricks study?

A

Failure to control ‘confounding variables’- some participants may look through their yearbook regularly while others never did

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What were the findings of Baddelys study?

A

Info in STM coded acoustically
Info in LTM coded semantically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What was a strength of Baddelys study?

A

Important step in understanding the memory system, helped to develop MSM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What’s a strengths of the MSM?

A

Good supporting evidence- Baddely proved STM is coded acoustically and LTM is coded semantically

More supporting evidence- HM had hippocampus removed and lost LTM but STM was fine-could not transfer info from LTM to STM- could remember his parents etc but if he met a new person they would always remain a stranger to him.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are limitations of the MSM?

A

Evidence that proves it wrong- KF had amnesia and proved the STM had separate stores for auditory and visual information.

Lacks mundane realism- most of the evidence used to support it used random letters and numbers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What are the different types of LTM (Tulving 1985)

A

Declarative- semantic, episodic

Implicit- procedural

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is the episodic memory?

A

-the ability to recall events from our lives
-they are time stamped
- Includes many details
- have to make a conscious effort to recall them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is the semantic memory?

A

-memories that relate to knowledge of the world
-not time stamped
- less personal
- have to make a conscious effort to recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What is procedural memory?

A

-memories of how we do things (ride a bike etc)
-acquired through repetition and practice
-doesn’t involve conscious thought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What are strengths of the types of LTM (Tulving 1985)?

A

Supporting evidence- HM proves there are separate stores in LTM

Physical evidence- Tulving used PET scanners when testing participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What’s a limitation of types of LTM (Tulving 1985)?

A

Unreliable evidence- lots of case studies used (HM) which may be unique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What are the Strengths of WMM?

A

Supporting evidence- KF could not process auditory info but could process visual info.

Supporting evidence- Baddelys dual-performance task- two visual talks at once=hard, visual + auditory take at once = easy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What is a limitation of WMM?

A

Not properly understood- ‘the CE is the most important but least understood component of the WMM’ Baddely.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What is interference

A

The idea that one memory has been blocked by another causing one or both to be forgotten or distorted. (Proactive and reteroactive)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What is proactive interference?

A

Post learning interferes with current learning (calling partner by ex’s name)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What is retroactive interference

A

When current learning interferes with past learning (not being able to remember new teachers name after getting a new one)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What are the strengths of the theory of interference?

A

Real world evidence- baddely and hitch asked rugby players which teams they played that season, players which played less games remembered more.

Supporting evidence- multiple highly controlled lab studies showed this theory to be correct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

What is a limitation of the theory of interference?

A

Other explanations can be used for forgetting- for interference to be a problem two pieces of information must be very similar, which is not common.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What is retrieval failure?

A

When the information is presented in the LTM but cannot be accessed because retrieval cues aren’t present.

40
Q

What is Tulving’s ‘encoding specificity principle’

A

States that if a cue is going to help us it must be present both at learning and at retrieval

41
Q

What is ‘context-dependant forgetting

A

Recall depends on EXTERNAL cues such as the weather or the place

42
Q

What is state-dependant forgetting

A

Recall depends on INTERNAL cues such as being drunk or upset

43
Q

What was Godden and Baddleys experiment on retrieval failure

A

People were asked to learn wordlists either on land or underwater and then recall them on land or underwater (4 groups)

44
Q

What were the results of godden and baddelys experiment?

A

Recall was 40% lower in non matching conditions (context-dependant forgetting)

45
Q

What was carter and Cassidy’s (1998) experiment on retrieval failure?

A

Similar to godden and baddely but with anti-histamine drugs.

46
Q

What were the results of carter and cassidys experiment?

A

Recall significantly lower in non-matching conditions.

47
Q

What are the strengths of retrieval failure as an explanation of forgetting?

A

Supporting evidence- godden and baddely and carter and Cassidy experiments.

Supporting evidence- Eysenck- said RF is the main reason for forgetting. (2010)

48
Q

What is a limitation of retrieval failure?

A

Low generalisability- you would never be in a situation where you learn and recall words underwater and on land

49
Q

What are the factors that affect EWT?

A

-misleading info: leading questions, post event discussion

-anxiety: negative, positive

50
Q

What was loftus and palmers experiment on EWT?

A

45 American students divided into 5 groups.
All watched the same clip of a car accident and when asked about it verb used was changed for each group
Smashed, hit, contacted etc

51
Q

What were the results of loftus and palmers research

A

Smashed= 40.5 mph
Contacted=31.8 mph

52
Q

What were the two explanations for loftus and palmers results?

A

Response bias- the verb didn’t alter the students memory

Substitution explanation- the verb did alter the students memory

53
Q

What was loftus and palmers follow up research done on substitution explanation.

A

They asked if the student remembered seeing broken glass (there want any)

Results
Smashed- 32% saw broken glass
Hit- 14% saw broken glass
Control group- 12% saw broken glass

54
Q

What was Gabberts experiment on post event discussion?

A

Made participants watch a crime from spectate angles so some would see details others would not. He then let some witnesses converse after and some not.

55
Q

What were the results of Gabberts experiment?

A

71% of people who conversed after witnessing the crime recalled details that they did not see.

0% did this when they didn’t converse

56
Q

What is a strength of the idea of misleading information in EWT

A

Real world application- car crash experiment can have a positive impact on how EWT are taken

57
Q

What are limitations of the idea of misleading information on EWT?

A

Low generalisability- watching a video is very different to witnessing an actually crime

Demand characteristics- Forster (2004) proved participants were more likely to identify a robber if they thought the scenario was real.

58
Q

What was Johnson and Scott’s experiment on anxiety?

A

Participants thought they were waiting for a lab study but there was a loud argument next door and one group saw a man walk out holding a bloody knife while the other group saw him holding a pen with grease on his hands.

Results
Pen and grease- 49% identified culprit
Blood and knife- 33% identified culprit

59
Q

What was Yuille and cutshalls experiment on anxiety?

A

Interviewed witnesses to a shooting 4-5 months after it happened and asked them to rate the stress they felt from 1-7.

Results
Higher stress- 88% accurate
Lower stress- 75% accurate

60
Q

What is the Yerkes Dodson law?

A

Graph that shows that too low and too high anxiety levels mean low arousal and there is an optimum point in the middle

61
Q

What is a strength for negative anxiety?

A

Supporting evidence- Valerie and Ames out used heart rate monitors to measure stress, and people who were more stressed were worse at identifying culprit

62
Q

What is a limitation of negative anxiety

A

Contrary evidence- surprise may be as important as anxiety. Pickel showed that if culprit held raw chicken as opposed to pen and grease recognition would also drop

63
Q

What is a strength of positive anxiety?

A

Supporting evidence- Christian and Hubinette interviewed witnesses of a real bank robbery and more stressed people had better recall

64
Q

What is a limitation of positive anxiety?

A

Yuille and Cutshall interviewed witnesses long after event which may decrease validity (post event discussion etc)

65
Q

What are the errors with normal police interviews?

A

-Interviewer does most of the talking
-Multiple choice questions
-Leading questions
-Interviewee told not to say ‘irrelevant’ info
-Memory may be contaminated

66
Q

What makes up the cognitive interview (Fisher and Geiselmen)?

A

-report everything (memories interconnected)
-reinstate the context (cues may help retrieval)
-reverse the order (stops schema)
-change the perspective (stops schema)

67
Q

What is a strength of the cognitive interview?

A

Supporting evidence- Kohnken probed 41% more correct info was obtained when CI was used.

68
Q

What is a limitation of the cognitive interview?

A

Too complex- takes too long for the police and isn’t achievable

69
Q

describe the central executive

A

boss- directs attention to particular tasks, determines how the three slave systems are allocated

coded-every sense

capacity- 4 pieces of info

70
Q

describe the phonological loop

A

about- deals with auditory info. split into phonological store which stores the words you hear and articulatory process- maintenance rehearsal (inner voice)

coded- auditory

capacity- 2 seconds

71
Q

describe the visuospatial sketchpad

A

about- helps us to navigate and interact with our environment. Logie suggested split into- VISUAL CACHE, stores visual info such as shape and colour. INNER SCRIBE- stores the arrangement objects

coded- visually

capacity- 3 or 4 objects

72
Q

describe the episodic buffer

A

about- store for CE. temporarily stores info. integrates infofrom other slave systems. maintains sense of time sequencing

coded- visually and acoustically

capacity- 4 chunks

73
Q

what is research evidence for the CE

A

Baddely found participants found it hard to generate a list of random numbers while simultaneously switching between letters and numbers on a key board-suggesting both were fighting for CE resources.

74
Q

what is research evidence for the PL

A

Badly gave participants 5 single syllable words and 5 multi-syllable words to recall ignorer. single-syllable words recalled more effectively

75
Q

what is research evidence for the VSS

A

Vogel showed participants a visual display of 3-12 objects for 900 milliseconds before switching to another display that was either identical similar. performance was good up to 4 pieces of info but then declined

76
Q

describe the sensory register in MSM

A

coding- modality specific

duration- half a second

capacity- very high, millions of cells in each eye

attention must be payed to transfer info to STM

77
Q

describe the STM in MSM

A

coding- acoustic

duration- 18-30 seconds

capacity- 9.3 digits 7.3 letters

prolonged rehearsal needed to get info to LTM

78
Q

describe the LTM in the MSM

A

coding- semantic

duration- limitless

capacity- limitless

maintenance rehearsal to transfer info back to STM

79
Q

what contradictory evidence did Watkins find for MSM

A

elaborative rehearsal needed not prolonged rehearsal to get info from STM to LTM

80
Q

what are the strengths of the types of LTM

A

supporting evidence- HM and Clive Wearing

RWA- Bellevile found technique to improve EM in elderly. when tested group who did exercise performed better in memory test than control group

supporting evidence- Hodges and Patterson found that some people with Alzheimers could form new EM but not SM

81
Q

what are the limitations of the types of LTM

A

conflicting evidence- Buckner and Peterson said EM located on left of PFC. Tulving said EM was on right of PFC

82
Q

what is the real world application of retrieval failure (A03)

A

Badly said it is worth paying attention to cues was they can aid remembering in real world situations

83
Q

what is the contrasting evidence for retrieval failure found by golden and baddely (AO3)

A

redid water land experiment but participants had to recognise initial words they learnt- context dependant forgetting not an issue

84
Q

what is the real world application of misleading info effecting EWT

A

psychologists often stand in front of jury to educate them on how EWT may be contaminated

85
Q

what is the evidence against substitution theory (misleading info AO3)

A

sutherland and Hayne found that misleading info only effects peripheral memories not central ones

86
Q

what is evidence against conformity in post event discussion

A

skangberg and wright had two groups watch same mugging but women mugged had dark brown hair or light brown hair. after post event discussion most said she had medium brown hair

87
Q

what is the function of repeat everything

A

triggers more memories

88
Q

what is the function of reinstating the context

A

aids context dependant forgetting

89
Q

what is the function of reversing the order

A

prevents dishonesty

90
Q

what is the function of changing the perspective

A

prevents effects of schema

91
Q

what was the 'enhanced cognitive interview'

A

fisher proposed this

included things like when the interviewer should maintain and break eye contact and how anxiety etc can be reduced

92
Q

what did kohnken find about the CI and ECI

A

CI produces more errors than normal interview

ECI produces more errors than CI

93
Q

what contradictory evidence did Milne and bull find about the CI

A

combining reporting everything and reinstating the context was more effective than using all four elements

94
Q

what is a limitation of interference

A

contradictory evidence- tucking and ptsoka gave people multiple word lists to learn- recall started at 70% then kept on dropping. however, a cued test for all words was given at the end and recall rose to 70% again- shows interference is only short term loss of accessibility to info in the LTM- this is not predicted by the theory

95
Q

what is a strength of interference

A

supporting evidence- found that if words were learnt before diazepam was taken recall was higher than if a placebo was taken. this iOS because the drug prevents info reaching parts of the brain involved with processing memory.

96
Q

what was mcgeoch and mcdonalds research into interference.

A

6 groups had top learn a list of words. 5 were then given another list to learn. found that the group who were given a new list of synonyms to previous words had the worst recall