Simon Chabris✅ Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Aim:

A

To investigate the influence of inattentional blindness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Type of experiment?

A

Lab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Type of design:

A

Independent measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many different conditions?

A

16

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How many pps and how were they recruited?

A

228pps
Self-selected sampling technique
Most were undergraduate students who were offered a reward of candy or a small fee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How many videos and how long were they?

A

4

Lasting 75s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What colours were the team wearing?

A

Black or white shirts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How were the instructions delivered to pps?

A

With a standardised script and a written protocol

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the unexpected events and when did they appear? (Independent variable 1)

A

A woman holding an umbrella/ a woman wearing a full gorilla costume

After 44-48 seconds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was independent variable 2?

A

Whether or not the video appeared as opaque or transparent (then had gorilla and umbrella condition for both transparent and opaque)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the third independent variable?

A

Whether or not pps had to follow white team or black team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the fourth independent variable?

A

Whether or not teams had to keep a silent mental count of passes (easy) or keep a silent mental count of aerial passes and bounce passes (hard)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What were pps asked after watching the videos?

A

Asked to record their number of counts

Then asked if they saw anything unusual/ surprising? Then asked if they saw gorilla/ umbrella

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happened to pps results if they lost count or admitted they had heard of inattentional blindness?

A

Results were discarded

192 pps remained

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How many conditions?

A

16

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How many notices the unexpected event?

A

54%

17
Q

How many failed to noticed unexpected event?

A

46%

18
Q

How many notices the unexpected event in opaque condition compared to transparent?

A

Opaque- 67%

Transparent- 42%

19
Q

How many pps noticed the unexpected event is easy compared to hard?

A

Easy- 64%

Hard- 45%

20
Q

How many pps noticed the umbrella compared to gorilla?

A

Umbrella- 65%

Gorilla- 44%

21
Q

Conclusions:

A
  • inattentional blindness depends on difficultly of task- more common is task is difficult
  • inattentional blindness is more common in cases of superimposition as opposed to live action