Hancock✅ Flashcards
Aim:
Test how crime narrative differs between psychopaths and non psychopathic murderers
-(examine features of language)
Method:
A self report- face to face interviews
Pps:
- 52pps
- 14 psychopaths (male)
- 38 non psychopathic murderers (male)
- mean age: 28.9 (14-50)
Where was the prison?
Canada
How many convicted of first degree murder/ second degree/ man slaughter/ not specified
8- first
32- second
10- manslaughter
2- not specified
What measure was used to test for psychopath/language?
- Psychopathy checklist revised- used to asses pps against 20 different criteria
- scores out of 40 (30 or above was cut off point for psychopathy)
Who carried out interviews?
Trained psychologists and researchers with coding experiences
Did they check for internal reliability?
Yes, had a trained graduate re-code 10 results randomly
What were pps asked to do?
Describe offences in detail whilst being recorded
Around 25 minutes each
Used open-end questions
Interviewers we’re blind to score
(Pps told aims and procedure of study at start)
What was the interview transcribed and analysed with?
Wmatrix- used to analyse speech and semantics
Dictionary of Affect in Language- analysed emotional properties
Positives of study:
- interviews- large amount of detail recorded (also qualitative data)
- quantitative data- easy to compare
- ecological validity- their own crimes (also interview was devised not to lead pps into answering in a certain way)
- good concurrent validity (same measures used)
- very reliable (replicable)
- high inter-rater reliability
- good ethics (privacy, fully informed consent, verbal brief at interview)
Negatives of study:
- maybe too much detail collected in interviews? A lot to compare? Time?
- social desirability bias- wanted to seem remorseful?
- unrepresentative sample- all Canadian, male and volunteers- bias. (ethnocentric)
Which sampling technique was used?
Self- selected