Bocchiaro Et Al Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Aim:

A

Investigate rates of obedience, disobedience and whistle-blowing where the instructions were visibly unethical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many pilot studies were involved?

A
  • 8 pilot studies

- 92 pps in total

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the purpose of the pilot studies?

A

To see if procedure was believable and ethical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many pps?

A

149 pps in main experiment

  • 96 women
  • 53 men
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mean age of pps:

A

20.8 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How were pps recruited?

A

Flyers in university cafeteria (VU university of Amsterdam)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many pps were surveyed about how they thought they would respond to this situation?

A

138
-given detailed description of situation and asked “what would you do?” And “what would the average student at your uni do?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What were pps given for participating?

A

-7 euros or course credits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did pps think experiment was about?

A

Sensory deprivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which 4 words were pps told to use to encourage other students to take part?

A
  • great
  • exciting
  • superb
  • incredible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What could pps do if they thought study was unethical?

A

Fill out an ethics committee form and put it in the mail box that was in the same room as them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How was (dis)obedience measured?

A

Whether or not pps composed an encouraging statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How was whistle blowing measured?

A

Whether or not pps filled out ethics form and mailed it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How many dispositional measures were then given to pps to measure certain personal attributes?

A

3- they were given to pps after being in room alone for 7 mins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Where pps debriefed?

A

Yes- emphasis on how they were deceived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How many people surveyed believed they would (dis)obey?

A

Obey- 3.6%
Disobey-31.9%
Whistle blow- 64.5%

17
Q

How many actually did obey/disobey/ whistle blow?

A

Obey- 76.5%
Disobey- 14.1%
Whistleblow- 9.4%

18
Q

Conclusions: (2)

A
  • people are very obedient and whistle blowing is uncommon

- people underestimate obedience and overestimate whistle blowing

19
Q

Main + evaluation points (4):

A
  • ecological validity
  • good internal reliability (same experience)
  • good sample size
  • good practical applications as whistleblowing is under-researched
20
Q
  • evaluation points (2):
A
  • sampling method (unrepresentative)

- ethical issues but accepted