RM Types Of Data And Self Report Flashcards
Pilot study
Small scale version of study
Takes place before real investigation
Might use fewer Qs if you’re conducting a questionnaire for example
Used to check flaws within investigation beforehand
Primary data
First hand data that’s been collected specifically for the purpose of the research via an exp, questionnaire, interview or observation
Strengths of primary data
Type of data is exactly what researcher wants - fit for purpose
Collected by researcher in the way that they want for their study that they’ve designed
Limitations of primary data
Time consuming for researcher
They have to design their study before they can collect any data which may take a long time
Secondary data
Data collected by someone other than the person doing the research via a journal, article, book or website
Strengths of secondary data
Less time consuming for researcher
Data already exists they are just using data another researcher has already collected
Limitations of secondary data
Data collected by another researcher so reliability may be questionable
Could be outdated, incomplete or may not match researchers needs
Meta analysis
Combing results from a number of studies on a particular topic to provide an overall view
Uses secondary data
Strengths of meta analysis
Results are more reliable as you are combining results from many studies
More likely to be trusted
Limitations of meta analysis
Can be affected by publication bias - researcher conducting meta analysis may not choose all relevant studies or excluding studies with differing results
So conclusions drawn may be incorrect
Self report
Questionnaires
A set of written questions on a topic on which opinions are sought
Closed question
People can only choose from a set of fixed answers
Collects quantitative data
Easy to analyse and compare results
Limited detail so less insight
Open question
People can describe what they think and feel in their own words
Collects qualitative data
More detail gathered so more insight
Difficult to analyse
Strengths of questionnaires
Less time consuming to gather sample
More representative
No social desirability - people answer honestly as questionnaires can be anonymous
High validity
Limitations of questionnaires
Bias sample - people who complete questionnaire could cause unrepresentative sample
Affected by misunderstanding which lowers validity
Interviews
Researcher directly asks Ps questions and records their responses
Structured interviews
Pre prepared set of questions in a fixed order
More formal
‘Audio questionnaire’
Unstructured interviews
Interview starts off with an aim and the interviewee is invited to discuss a particular topic freely
No fixed questions
Same aim may produce very different interview responses
Strengths of interviews
Structured interviews are easy to replicate
Unstructured interviews provide more detailed, insightful data
Limitations of interviews
Interviewer effect - the way the interviewer may come across may alter the way in which the P responds
Structured interviews are rigid and you can’t deviate form set Qs - no more insight
Unstructured interviews can’t be replicated - lower reliability