Research Methods Flashcards
What is validity?
The extent to which a study provides a true or legitimate explanation of behaviour
What are the two different types of validity?
Internal validity and external validity
What are the three different types of internal validity?
- control
- construct validity
- mundane realism
What are the three different types of external validity?
- ecological validity
- population validity
- historical validity
What is external validity affected by and why?
Affected by internal validity because you can’t generalise the results of a study that lacks internal validity because the results have a no meaning for the behaviour that they were studying
What are the four different types of psychology experiments?
- laboratory experiment
- field experiment
- natural experiment
- quasi experiment
Give three features of laboratory experiments
- highly controlled environment
- IV and DV is controlled
- no randomness
Give two features of field experiments
- natural, more everyday setting
2. manipulates IV but records what naturally happens to the DV
Give two features of quasi experiments
- control DV
2. no manipulating the IV - based on existing difference
Give three features of natural experiments
- takes advantage of pre-existing IV
- no control - opposite to laboratory
- would still have happened if researcher wasn’t there
Give two weaknesses of laboratory experiments
- lacks mundane realism
2. participants may not behave naturally, leading to lower ecological validity
Give two strengths of laboratory experiments
- well controlled = less extraneous/confounding variables = higher internal validity
- can easily be replicated
Give three weaknesses of field experiments
- more time consuming and expensive
- less control = more extraneous/confounding variables = lower internal validity
- participants not aware of being studied = major ethical issue
Give two strengths of field experiments
- increased mundane realism
2. more natural behaviour from participants as their not aware that they’re being studied
Give two strengths of natural experiments
- allow research to be done where the IV can’t be manipulated
- increased mundane realism and ecological validity
Give four weaknesses of natural experiments
- cannot demonstrate casual relationships because IV is not deliberately manipulated
- random allocation of participants to conditions is not possible
- sample might have unique characteristics meaning that the results cannot be generalised to the public = low population validity
- can only be used where conditions vary naturally
Give one strength of quasi experiments
allows comparison between different types of people
Give five weaknesses of quasi experiments
- can only be used where conditions vary naturally
- participants may be aware that they’re being studied = reduced internal validity
- DV may be a fairly artificial task = reduced mundane realism
- random allocation of participants to conditions is not possible
- cannot demonstrate casual relationships because IV is not deliberately manipulated
What is an ethical issue a conflict between
- what the researcher needs to conduct a useful and meaningful research
- the rights of the participants
Ethical issue - how to deal with informed consent
- participants asked formally to indicate their agreement to participate by signing a consent form
- an alternative would be to gain presumptive consent
- offer the right to withdraw
Ethical issue - how to deal with deception
- the need for this should be approved by an ethics committee using a cost benefit analysis
- participants should be fully debriefed and offered an opportunity to discuss any concerns
Ethical issue - how to deal with the right to withdraw
- participants should be told at the start of the study that they have the right to withdraw from the study at any point
Ethical issue - how to deal with protection from harm
- avoid any risks greater than in everyday life
- stop study if any harm is suspected
- offer participants the right to withdraw
Ethical issue - how to deal with confidentiality
- researchers should not record the names of any participants; they should use numbers or fake names