Research Methods Flashcards
What is validity?
The extent to which a study provides a true or legitimate explanation of behaviour
What are the two different types of validity?
Internal validity and external validity
What are the three different types of internal validity?
- control
- construct validity
- mundane realism
What are the three different types of external validity?
- ecological validity
- population validity
- historical validity
What is external validity affected by and why?
Affected by internal validity because you can’t generalise the results of a study that lacks internal validity because the results have a no meaning for the behaviour that they were studying
What are the four different types of psychology experiments?
- laboratory experiment
- field experiment
- natural experiment
- quasi experiment
Give three features of laboratory experiments
- highly controlled environment
- IV and DV is controlled
- no randomness
Give two features of field experiments
- natural, more everyday setting
2. manipulates IV but records what naturally happens to the DV
Give two features of quasi experiments
- control DV
2. no manipulating the IV - based on existing difference
Give three features of natural experiments
- takes advantage of pre-existing IV
- no control - opposite to laboratory
- would still have happened if researcher wasn’t there
Give two weaknesses of laboratory experiments
- lacks mundane realism
2. participants may not behave naturally, leading to lower ecological validity
Give two strengths of laboratory experiments
- well controlled = less extraneous/confounding variables = higher internal validity
- can easily be replicated
Give three weaknesses of field experiments
- more time consuming and expensive
- less control = more extraneous/confounding variables = lower internal validity
- participants not aware of being studied = major ethical issue
Give two strengths of field experiments
- increased mundane realism
2. more natural behaviour from participants as their not aware that they’re being studied
Give two strengths of natural experiments
- allow research to be done where the IV can’t be manipulated
- increased mundane realism and ecological validity
Give four weaknesses of natural experiments
- cannot demonstrate casual relationships because IV is not deliberately manipulated
- random allocation of participants to conditions is not possible
- sample might have unique characteristics meaning that the results cannot be generalised to the public = low population validity
- can only be used where conditions vary naturally
Give one strength of quasi experiments
allows comparison between different types of people
Give five weaknesses of quasi experiments
- can only be used where conditions vary naturally
- participants may be aware that they’re being studied = reduced internal validity
- DV may be a fairly artificial task = reduced mundane realism
- random allocation of participants to conditions is not possible
- cannot demonstrate casual relationships because IV is not deliberately manipulated
What is an ethical issue a conflict between
- what the researcher needs to conduct a useful and meaningful research
- the rights of the participants
Ethical issue - how to deal with informed consent
- participants asked formally to indicate their agreement to participate by signing a consent form
- an alternative would be to gain presumptive consent
- offer the right to withdraw
Ethical issue - how to deal with deception
- the need for this should be approved by an ethics committee using a cost benefit analysis
- participants should be fully debriefed and offered an opportunity to discuss any concerns
Ethical issue - how to deal with the right to withdraw
- participants should be told at the start of the study that they have the right to withdraw from the study at any point
Ethical issue - how to deal with protection from harm
- avoid any risks greater than in everyday life
- stop study if any harm is suspected
- offer participants the right to withdraw
Ethical issue - how to deal with confidentiality
- researchers should not record the names of any participants; they should use numbers or fake names
Ethical issue - how to deal with privacy
- do not study anyone without informed consent unless its in a public place and its public behaviour
Ethical issue - limitations of informed consent
- participants knowing all information about study may affect results
- even with informed consent this does not ensure participants really understand what they are involved in
- a problem with presumptive consent is that what people think they will or will not mind is different to actually experiencing it
Ethical issue - limitations of deception
- cost-benefit analyses are flawed because they involve subjective judgements and the costs/benefits are not always apparent until after the study
- debriefing can’t turn the clock back and participants may still feel embarrassed or have lowered self-esteem
Ethical issue - limitations of the right to withdraw
- participants may feel as though they shouldn’t leave because it will ruin the study or are being payed at the end of the study and therefore are more reluctant to leaving
Ethical issue - limitations of protection from harm
- harm may not be apparent at the time of the study and only is judged later with hindsight
Ethical issue - limitations of confidentiality
- sometimes possible to work out who the participants were using information that has been provided
Ethical issue - limitations of privacy
- there is no universal agreement on what constitutes as a public place
What are the four main principles of the most recent code of ethics and conduct?
- respect
- competence
- responsibility
- integrity
What are the three main types experimental designs?
- independent groups
- repeated measures
- matched pairs
Give three ways of dealing with the limitations of the repeated measures design
- researchers may use two different (equivalent) tests to reduce the practice effect
- counterbalancing
- in order to avoid participants guessing the aims of the study, a cover story may be presented about the purpose of the test
Give one way of dealing with the limitations of the independent groups design
- randomly allocate participants to conditions which (theoretically) distributes participant variables evenly
Give two ways of dealing with the limitations of the matched pairs design
- restrict the number of variables to match on to make it easier
- conduct a pilot study to consider key variables that might be important when matching participants
Give two strengths of the repeated measures design
- controls participant variables because the same participants are in all conditions
- you only need half as many participants as IG and MP
Give four weaknesses of the repeated measures design
- the order of conditions may affect performance
- because all participants do all conditions they may guess the aim of the experiment
- one of the tests may be more difficult than another
- a gap may be needed between each conditions to reduce effects such as boredom or fatigue