Research Flashcards
Studies in order of best evidence
Systematic reviews>RTCs> cohort study, case control, cross sectional, case series, case reports, ideas/opinions
Meta analysis
Type of systematic review - has an estimate of effect size by comparing multiple RTCs to determine the effectiveness of a treatment; can minimize the issue of a small sample size
Cohort studies
Observational longitudinal study - looks at a specific group of people with a risk factor and follows to see if they get the disease or not; can be done prospectively or retrospectively; difficult bc a lot of lifestyle factors can influence outcomes
Case control study
Retrospective observational study; individuals with a disease are matched with a comparison group of those without the disease - looking for differences in exposture and occurrence of disease = the odd’s ratio
Cross sectional study
Observational study - data collection done only at one point in time and all participants are tested at relateively the same time. Describes relationships between a disease and factors of interest that exist in that population at a given time; can look at prevalence - but can’t look at newly occurring conditions, and doesn’t give a causal relationship
Case report or series
In depth description of an individual’s condition or response to treatment; cannot test hypotheses or estabilish cause & effect
Descriptive research
Analyzing with the goal of classifying and understanding a clinical phenomenon EX: developmental, normative, qualitative, case report, series
Experimental research
Comparing 2 or more conditions for the purpose of determining cause and effect EX: RTCs, quasi experimental studies, single subject designs
Exploratory research
Examines the dimensions of a phenomenon of interest and its relationships to other factors; EX: cohort studies, case control, historical research, methodological
Qualitative research
Data from observation/interviews focused on meaning and interpretations to gain an understanding in thoughts and opinions or develop hypotheses; global, probing, small sample size, non statistical, exploratory or investigative - findings cannot be used to make generalizations
Quantitative
Data or measurements that are analyzed via statistics with the goal of quantifying data to generalize results onto a population; non-probing, specific, large sample size, objective observer, used to recommend a final course of action
Respect for persons
Refers to individuals rights to make autonomous decisions about their health care
Beneficent
The obligation of the researcher to provide for the well being of their subjects by maximizing benefits and minimizing the possible harm
minimal risk
The magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research is not greater than that ordinarily encourntered in daily living
Vulnerable populations
Typically minors, those with diminished capacity to consent, pregnant women, human fetuses, neonate, non-English speaking, prisoners, students
Continuous data
Can assume any value along a continuous scale that covers a range of values without gaps or interruptions
Discrete data
Measured in whole units: HR, number of clinic visits, etc.
Dischotomous data
Type of discrete data; limited to only two values: gender, smoking vs non smoking, etc.
Qualitative data
Categorical; non numeric
Quantitative data
Measurements or numerical value
Nominal scale
Classification scale; Ea object and person can only be assigned to one category; ex: blood type, breath sound
Ordinal scale
Ranking scale, based on the property of the variable; muscle grading tests, level of assistance, joint laxity scale
Interval scale
Measurement scale where intervals are equal and there is no true zero point; Ex: temperature on the F or C scale
Ratio
measurement scale where the intervals are equal and there is a true zero: ex; ROM, distance walked, time to complete an activity
Alternate forms reliability
Parallel forms reliability; 2 things are assessing the same thing consistently and accurately; ex: different NPTE tests can be administered throughout the year as long as their reliability is the same
Internal consistency
The extent that items or elements that contribute to a measurement reflect one dimension; ex: a functional assessment scale should only include things that look at pt’s function
Intrarater reliability
Consistency of one person repeating the same measure
Inter-rather reliability
Consistency of a test being measured by different people
Test-retest reliability
Consistency or equivalence of repeated measurements performed on the same person
Face validity
Degree of which a measurement tests what it is supposed to
Content validity
Degree in which a measurement reflects meaningful elements; ex: location, and type of pain, not just number of pain
Construct validity
Degree of which a theoretical construct is measure by a test or measure; ex: MMT to innervation status of a muscle.
Criterion related validity
Validity of a measure is determined by comparing it to a gold standard
Concurrent validity
Criterion related validity; measurement is compared to a gold standard at the same time as it is being tested by something else
Predictive validity
Criterion related validity; measurement is considered valid because it predicts future behavior or events; ex: GRE to predict grad school success
Prescriptive validity
Criterion related validity; the measurement suggests the form of treatment the pt should receive, then measured by the successful outcome of the treatment
Sampling error
Chance difference between statistical calculated from a sample and the true value of the parameter in the population; inherent in the use of sampling
Sampling with replacement vs without
Ea unit sampled is put back in the population before the next is drawn, ea unit truly has an equal chance of being selected; not used with humans; without: no placed back, reduces the size of the population
Probability sampling
Sampling that uses random selection
Systematic sampling
Every ‘n’th number in a population is selected; simplicity
Stratified random sampling
Population is dived into homogenous subgroups then simple random sampling from each group; this assumes that the sample will be representative of key subgroups as well as the overall population
Cluster sampling
Population divided into clusters, usually based on geography; then random samples of the clusters are taken; less costly and more efficient than simple random sampling