Relationships Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are determinants of liking?

A

Similarity
Proximity
Reciprocity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is proximity and what are 3 factors?

A

Physical closeness represents a minimal requirement for attraction. The smaller the distance separating, the greater the chance of attraction taking place.
Factors: familiarity, availability and expectation of continued social interaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Moreland and Beach 1992 study

A

Had confederates show up to class either 0, 5, 10, 15 times during the term; the more visits, the more they were liked - even if no interactions with other students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define reciprocity

A

Responding to a positive action with another positive action, rewarding kind actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reciprocity - Regan (1971)

A

1 participant and a partner asked to rate paintings, afterwards partner left and came back with 2 bottles of coke. Partner asked participant if they would buy raffle tickets from them. Results: PP in experimental condition bought twice as many raffle tickets than PP in controlled condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reciprocity - Regan 1971

A

1 PP + partner asked to rate painting. Partner left and came back with 2 cokes (one for PP). Partner then asked PP if they would buy raffle tickets off them. Results: PP in experimental condition (receive coke) bought twice as many raffle tickets than PP in controlled condition (no coke)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is similarity based on determinants of liking?

A

Mutual attraction is based on the degree of similarity, namely;
Attitudes and values, level of education, political and religious views, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Similarity- what is balance theory?

A

We like people who are similar to ourselves - affirm our beliefs and values. Disagreements can cause friendships to be unbalanced, to regain balance someone must change their view.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Similarity- Griffit and Veitch 1974

A

Studied 13 males who spent 10 days in a fallout shelter, concluded that those who were most similar liked each other the best by the end

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is social exchange theory?

A

We view our feelings for others in terms of profits - the amount of reward obtained from a relationship minus cost. Degree of attraction/liking influences how we evaluate the rewards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are some limitations to social exchange theory?

A

Sees people as selfish and human relationships as primarily based on self interest. Implies all relationships are of exchange variety, however this can be argued against

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When are interactions with peers more significant and why?

A

More significant during adolescence. Friendships become deeper as they need to establish more autonomy, independence and more intimate relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Identify and describe the 3 levels of peer groups in adolescence

A

Dyads- pair of close friends or lovers
Cliques- small groups who interact frequently
Crowds- larger group with similar affiliations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Dunphy, 1963- The Changing Structure of Adolescent Groups

A

Used participant observation and observed young people in Sydney over 6 months in cafes, beaches, their homes and parties. Developed 5 stages concerning the structure of adolescent groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Dunphy 1963: Stage 1

A

Young people formed cliques (4-10)
Tight structure and a leader
Membership required conformity (dress code, interests, attitudes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dunphy 1963: Stage 2

A

Crowds formed when unisex cliques interact. One is part of a crowd only if already belongs to a clique. Crowd activities seen at weekends e.g., shopping malls, beaches, parties

16
Q

Dunphy 1963: Stage 3

A

Crowd changes its structure - higher ranking members form heterosexual cliques. Teenagers are now older and more inclined to date more

17
Q

Dunphy 1963: Stage 4

A

“Fully developed crowd” composed of a number of couples closely associated

18
Q

Dunphy 1963: Stage 5

A

Couples tend to go their separate ways

19
Q

Knapp, 1978 Stages of love - Stage 1

A

Initiation

Making an impression. Inaccurate judging in this stage, physical appearance plays a great part

20
Q

Knapp, 1978 Stages of love - Stage 2

A

Experimentation
All about exploring to know each other well. Person will analyze the other for information or a common interest to decide whether or not to maintain relationship

21
Q

Knapp, 1978 Stages of love - Stage 3

A

Intensifying
The relationship intensifies and becomes less formal. People start revealing personal info and will analyze the impression on the other person

22
Q

Knapp, 1978 Stages of love - Stage 4

A

Integration

People start to make relationship much more closer than before. People may fall in love at this stage

23
Q

Knapp, 1978 Stages of love - Stage 5

A

Bonding
Relationship becomes announced ad recognized. The relationship is indefinite and only broken through formal notice, agreements, death, etc.

24
Q

Sternberg, 1987- what are the three components of love?

A

Intimacy
Passion
Commitment

25
Q

Duck- why do relationships go wrong?

A
Pre-existing doom
Mechanical failure
Sudden death
Demographic background
Marrying very early
Having experienced a lack of relationship commitment 
Low socio-economic or educational levels
26
Q

What are interpersonal factors leading to the breakdown of relationships?

A

Boredom

Conflict