Psychopathology Flashcards
What affects abnormality
your subjective opinions, the culture you live in, the norms where you live or who you live with.
Methods of defining abnormalities
- Statistical deviation
- Deviation from social norms
- Failure to function adequately 4. Deviation from ideal mental health
Statistical deviation
Occurs when a person has a less common characteristic than most of the population e.g. being more depressed or have less intelligence
This uses the STANDARD DEVIATION and DISTRIBUTION – to what extent does a person’s characteristics deviate from the norm.
Limitations of statistical deviation
Fails to distinguish between desirable and undesirable behaviour. Statistically speaking, many very gifted individuals could be classified as ‘abnormal’ using this definition.
Some characteristics are regarded as abnormal even though they are quite frequent.
Depression affects 1 in 5 elderly people- makes it common but does not mea n it isn’t a problem
Evaluation of statistical deviation
Real life application - Strength
Statistical deviation is a useful part of clinical diagnosis so it therefore applicable to real life – e.g. the IQ distribution is a representative of the real population – in fact, most disorders have some sort of statistical measurement.
Unusual characteristics could be positive!
Statistical deviation is useless when the “abnormality” is a good thing e.g. an IQ of 130!
This is statistically abnormal but not clinically a bad thing!
Evaluation of Statistical Deviat
Labelling – does not always benefit the individual
Meet Dave.
Dave is a happy, kind man who leads a functional and fulfilled life. He is 40 years old and works in a supermarket stacking shelves and keeping all the trollies in order. He lives with his mother in a two bedroom flat and has never left home. He has an IQ of 56.
Should we diagnose Dave with Intellectual Disability Disorder? It will involve someone telling Dave he has a disorder and on his record
Evaluation of Statistical Deviati
Labelling – does not always benefit the individual
Labelling is powerful and might affect people in a negative way. If you give people a label, they might start acting in a way that fulfils the label.
Some people are “abnormal” but lead happy and fulfilled lives. If we label someone then we run the risk of developing a self fulfilling prophecy
failure to function adequately
cross the line between normal to abnormal at any point when they can no longer cope with the demands of everyday life.
Therefore they fail to function adequately.
examples to not functioning adequately
Unable to meet basic standards of nutrition
Cannot hold down a job
Cannot maintain relationships
Unable to meet basic standards of hygiene
rosenhan and selignan
proposed the following signs that can be used to determine whether someone is coping or not.
no longer conforms to standard interpersonal rules
When a person experiences severe personal distress (themselves) or causes distress and discomfort to others.
behaviour is unpredictable and sometimes uncontrolled
behaviour is irrational and hard to understand
Maladaptiveness – the behaviour interferes with a person’s usual daily routine – goes against their long term interests
Strength of FFA
Represents a threshold for help
One strength of FFA is that it provides a criterion for when people need professional help. Most of us have symptoms of mental disorder to some extent at some point in time
Mind – around 25% of people in the UK will experience a mental health problem in any given year
However, many people continue to work despite of these symptoms. It tends to be when we cease to function adequately is when we need to seek professional help.
So this criterion means that treatment and services can be specifically targeted to those who need it the most
weakness of FFA
n practice it can be hard to say when someone is failing top function adequately and when they are simply just deviating from social norms. We might see new age travellers as failing to function adequately but what if its just an alternative lifestyle? Similarly base jumpers might be seen as having a maladaptive lifestyle and spiritualists – irrational. If we class these as FFA, then we risk limiting personal freedom and discriminating against minority groups
group eg ,New Age traveller
Do not live in permanent accommodation and may not work
group eg. base jumpers
Take part in extreme sports with a high mortality rate
group eg.spirtuality
take part in religious rituals believing they are communicating with the dead
limitations of ffa
Having a Psychological Disorder
may not result in FFA.
People often maintain adequate function
when facing anxiety or depression.
People with personality disorders can appear
perfectly normal most of the time.
- Cultural Relativity is a key issue of FFA. Standard patterns of behaviour vary from culture to culture, so FFA may look different depending upon which culture you are in.
It is easy to label non-standard lifestyle choices as abnormal, but they may have simply chosen to deviate from social norms – new age travellers
good mental health
high self-esteem and a strong sense of identity are related to good mental health. According to Jahoda, to be mentally healthy, someone must know who they are and like what they see. Free from guilt
extent of a person’s self-development or progress towards Self-Actualisation.
autonomy - the extent to which an individual is free of social influences – independent of other people
We have no symptoms or distress
We can cope with stress
evaluation of dimh
Cultural relativism:
Jahoda’s characteristics are rooted in Western societies and are therefore culture bound. – For example, the focus on personal achievement characterised by self actualisation is not the case in collectivist cultures which would instead be considered self-indulgent and they would rather focus on community rather than autonomy and the self– cultural relativity
- It sets an unrealistically high standard for ideal mental health!
Very few people actually match the Jahoda’s criteria and probably none of us will achieve them all at the same time or be able to keep them up for very long. So by definition the majority of the population would be classified as abnormal. Thus its unclear how far a person could
deviate before being defined as abnormal.
On the positive side, it makes clear to people the positives of seeking help – such as counselling to improve mental health
Phobias
anxiety disorder. An irrational fear of an object or situation which can interfere with daily living.
How phobias are diagnosed
The dsm-5
diagnosing mental disorders
updated every so often as ideas about abnormalities change. We are currently on the 5th edition of the DSM hence the -5 (2013)
What are phobias categorised by
excessive fear and anxiety triggered by a place, situation or object. This anxiety is is out of proportion by any danger presented by the phobic stimulus.
3 categories:
Three types of phobias
1)agoraphobia
2)social phobias
3)specific phobias
Agoraphobia
Fear of open space beings outside or in public spaces
Social phobias
Fear of interacting or having social interactions ,public speaking ,using public toilet