PSY331 - 6. Emotion Regulation Flashcards
Emotion Regulation
Strategies we use to control which emotions we have, when, and how strongly we experience/express them
Emotion Regulation
We use when emotions hurt us by: Being of the wrong type
Emotion Regulation
Occurring at the wrong time: excited for vacation, but have a test
Occurring at the wrong intensity level: not happy enough for gift
I. Emotion Regulation Model
Gross, 2008
- Situation’s familiarity, valence, value, relevance
emotional cue - like familiar things, is this helping me, in line with my moral - antecedent focused emotional regulation (reappraisal)
I. Emotion Regulation Model
Gross, 2008
emotional response: behavioural, experiential, physiological
response focused emotion regulation (suppression)
Modal Model of Emotion Regulation
Gross & Thompson, 2007; Gross & Barrett, 2011
processes
strategies at moment in time: situation, situation modification, attention deployment, cognitive change, response modulation
Modal Model of Emotion Regulation
Gross & Thompson, 2007; Gross & Barrett, 2011
situation - attention - appraisal - response
attention + appraisal - cognitive processes
can occur at different times
changing situation as a result of response
II. Antecedent-Focused Regulation:
A. Situation Selection
Choosing situations taking into consideration potential future consequences of our actions for our emotional responses (affective forecasting)
deciding in the future, which ones to avoid and approach that will lead to positive emotions
II. Antecedent-Focused Regulation:
A. Situation Selection
affective forecasting: how we’re going to feel in the future
pretty bad at forecasting how long we’ll be feeling emotion
avoidance coping techniques can be problematic: missing opportunities - avoiding finding love because of risk of hurting
II. Antecedent-Focused Regulation:
A. Situation Selection
more avoidance based - increased stressors over 4 years, increasing depression
more likely to die of heart failure in 6 years
B. Situation Modification
Attempts to modify situation to alter emotional impact (active or problem-focused coping)
when you modify situation, you’re choosing one
modifying external environment: putting on earbuds during noisy situation
B. Situation Modification
just need to feel like we have control over situation
perception of little control leads to depression
if they managed to push joystick in right time, less time in pain - random
perceived control leads to less pain perception
C. Attention Deployment
Influencing emotional responding by redirecting attention within a given situation (an internal situation selection)
distraction: breathing, distract when injecting without changing situation
C. Attention Deployment
think of nonemotional aspects
focusing on threat makes emotion response bigger
told voted out of survivor game: either sit there or distractions (comics, music) - distracted felt better and more cognitive control
Ayduk et al. (2002)
Ps vividly remembered a rejection experience and…
IV: focused on emotional/physiological sensations OR room’s features.
Ayduk et al. (2002)
DVs:
a) lexical decision task (hostility words)
b) self-report of angry feelings
c) essay about experience (anger/hurt)
Ayduk et al. (2002)
embedded in words - priming hostility
emotional state - more ready to see hateful words
distracted took longer - brain wasn’t ready
Ayduk et al. (2002)
self report: distracted = less angry
essay: less hurtful/angry essay
works for only so long - get tired eventually
D. Cognitive Change
Modifying internal situations
Changing one or more of our appraisals (primary or secondary) in a way that alters the situation’s emotional significance
D. Cognitive Change
restructuring
primary: maybe wasn’t bad after all
secondary: it is bad, but i can cope with it
interpreting it as a challenge instead of a threat
D. Cognitive Change
tamaka: mental arithmatic posed as threat or challenge
threat: quickly and accurately as you can
challenge: you can do this
better blood pressure, cardio and less stress
D. Cognitive Change
jackson: suppress emotion after negative picture
inventing or looking for silver lining
focus on real, neutral or positive aspect
Lazarus & Alfert (1964)
Ps watched films of a tribal circumcision ceremony.
Some Ps were instructed to reinterpret the scene in a
non-emotional way.
DVs: a) Feelings of depression/pleasure
b) Amount of physiological arousal
Lazarus & Alfert (1964)
brain activation also changes
less depression
less arousal
Cognitive Change (Gross & John, 2003)
People who use cognitive reappraisal report:
Increased dispositional positive affect
Cognitive Change (Gross & John, 2003)
Decreased negative affect
Increased life satisfaction
Lower risk of depression
Cognitive Change (Gross & John, 2003)
Peer-rated likeability
Increased sharing of emotions with others
Closer relationships to others
Cognitive Change (Gross & John, 2003)
forgiveness
humour
release tension - getting rid of grudge
III. Response-Focused Emotion
Regulation: Response Modulation
Influencing physiological, experiential, or behavioural responses relatively directly (emotion-focused coping).
III. Response-Focused Emotion
Regulation: Response Modulation
emotion focused
rather than dealing problem
Regulation of Physiological Arousal
Sheppard et al. (1997) – Ps either:
a) went through 12-week meditation program
b) spent same amount of time listening to lectures about stress reduction
Regulation of Physiological Arousal
exercises, breathing, drinking
Only meditation group had long lasting decreases in anxiety and depression
Regulation of Physiological Arousal
Venting/Catharsis: often increases emotion
encouraging crying in sad movies leads to more sadness
venting have more anxiety in interpersonal relationships
contempt is the worst you can vent in interpersonal relationships