Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

PSY331 > PSY331 - 5. Facial Expression > Flashcards

PSY331 - 5. Facial Expression Flashcards

1
Q

The Origin of Facial Expressions

A

All humans have same facial muscles and nerves that control them.
darwin noticed facial expressions were shared by different species

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The Origin of Facial Expressions

A

Independent motor systems:

i. Subcortical (extrapyramidal): automatic
ii. Cortical (pyramidal): control - more implicated in cultural differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A. Measuring Facial Expressions

A

Strategic smiles (social smiles) - fake smiles
zygomaticus major
Duchenne smile (enjoyment smile) - true smile of happiness
zygomaticus major + orbicularis oculi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Facial Affect Scoring Technique (FAST)

A

77 descriptors from three parts of the face
Describe facial movements
pictures of three parts of the face

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Facial Affect Scoring Technique (FAST)

A

surprise: should have up eyebrows, open eyes, gaping mouth

judgement approach: use prototypical components of facial expression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Facial Affect Scoring Technique (FAST)

A

limitation: No measure of intensity/facial changes over time

static procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Facial Action Coding System (FACS)

A

Anatomically based coding system based on minimal
facial muscle actions involved in expressions
minute muscular movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Facial Action Coding System (FACS)

A

so other ppl can replicate study
coding for intensity and movement and time course
way eyes are looking
Provides 44 facial action units (AUs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Judgment approach

A

Can an observer determine others’ emotions from their facial expression? innate or learned?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Judgment approach

A

if everyone is making same expression then it should be nature, not nurture
way easier
accurate when agree on emotion greater than chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Darwin’s thesis of universality

A

must be adaptive functioning
evolution wasn’t the norm back then
over time, seeing that all cultures are able to discern emotion
born deaf or blind show same facial expressions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ekman – cross-cultural judgment approach research

A

asked what is happening in this picture; look at this pic, what are they feeling (open or scenario based)
across cultures, even with no contact, same expressions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

B. Nature vs. Culture

A

Different patterns of brain activation when perceiving
distinct facial expressions
we’re noticing diff in diff configurations of face
even if diff race (europeans), they recognized it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Nature vs. Culture

A
  1. All stimuli at once: compare/contrast - inflating differentiation ability
  2. Strong, conventional, + prototypical: not often showing this emotion, overstating how well we can disambiguate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Nature vs. Culture

A
  1. Implies mutual exclusivity: removes possibility there is more than 1 - able to use process for elimination
  2. Does not allow “not on this list”/“situationally dependent”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Nature vs. Culture

A
  1. Standard chance level questionable: only 1 positive emotion, changes are increased
    deflated chance level, stimuli showed 1 at a time, added not on this list = still same findings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Frank and Stennett (2001)

A

Used modified forced-choice format with “none of these terms is correct” option
chose none of the above
second study, removed “correct” facial expression from list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Frank and Stennett (2001)

A

In another study, added additional plausible labels:
alarmed, bored, contempt, and excited
still correctly recognized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Nature vs. Culture

A

Typical procedures might underestimate ppl’s ability to interpret emotional expression
notice bunch of things: tears, posture, tone of voice, smell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Adams and Kleck (2003)

A

showed different eye positions

better at discerning fear when looking away from us, because not likely looking at us when they are scared

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Nature vs. Culture: Haidt and Keltner (1999)

A

American and Indian samples

Identified 14 facial expressions using own words & forced-choice procedure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Nature vs. Culture

A

Included extra facial expressions: embarrassment,
shame, compassion, amusement, tongue biting, face
covering, and gaping.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

seven ekman expressions

A

anger, fear, happiness, sadness, disgust, surprise, contempt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Haidt and Keltner (1999)

A

ppl are discerning anger, disgust, happiness, surprise, sadness
not as problematic as thought to be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Nature vs. Culture

A

In-group advantage - more accuracy when viewing
members of same culture
Cultural differences in display rules - cultural rules
about expressing emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Nature vs. Culture

A

women allowed to show sadness

who you’re allowed to show emotions to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Nature vs. Culture: Interactionist perspective

A

Strong innate component for several facial expressions of emotions
Cultural rules influence which facial expression individuals exhibit
interaction of nature and nurture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Nature vs. The Purpose of Facial Expressions: Emotion-Expression View

A

just release of muscle energy
displays of internal states of emotion
ekman: natural reaction to emotion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

The Purpose of Facial Expressions: Emotion-Expression View

A

distinct facial expression for eeg, F.A.C.T.S

pleasant/negative stimuli - seperate muscle movements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

The Purpose of Facial Expressions

A

-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

The Purpose of Facial Expressions: Behavioural Ecology View

A

Functions: Informative (e.g., emotional state, behavioural intentions, relational status)
Evocative: how other ppl treat you (e.g., others’ anger - avoidance; fear - approach)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

The Purpose of Facial Expressions

A

Incentive (i.e., respond to demands/opportunities in

the environment)

33
Q

Video

A

can’t control facial expressions

concentrating on video games

34
Q

Individuals Smiling While Bowling

A

facing others: smiling even when they get a bad score

social effect on emotions

35
Q

% Fans Smiling While Watching Hockey

A

even in bad play smile with others

36
Q

% Pedestrians Smiling

A

social reason for showing facial expression even when not in line with internal emotion
smile at strangers even in bad weather

37
Q

Sociality and Facial Expressions

A 
Chovil (1991)
Ps learned “close call” stories:
on an audiotape
in the same room, but sitting behind a screen
over the telephone
face-to-face
38
Q

Sociality and Facial Expressions

A

Expression of social smiles increases with sociality, but

reported feelings of enjoyment do not increase

39
Q

Sociality and Facial Expressions

A

least to most amount of facial reaction
signals to others ppl
as sociality increases, more fake smiling we do

40
Q

Emotion Recognition/Microexpressions

A

Emotion recognition ability linked to emotional intelligence
Ability to recognize microexpressions linked with lie
detection ability
Micro Expression Training Tool - shown to cops

41
Q

Emotion Recognition/Microexpressions

A

can we leak out emotions we try to hide
emotional intelligence - awareness of emotions
see if we can catch ppl with their lie through leaks
want to lie, but facial expressions are coming out

42
Q

Context in Emotion Recognition

A

context gives us indication of what emotion is shown

can change understanding of expression

43
Q

Context in Emotion Recognition: Knudsen and Muzekari (1983)

A

Ps see sad facial expression; told person just received large increase in salary…
when they matched, more likely to agree that person was sad

44
Q

Context in Emotion Recognition

A

Vulnerability to reinterpretation - when cues conflict,
reinterpret one to bring it in line
now they weren’t coming to a confident conclusion
could be lying
disambiguate by making sense of it based on context
understand emotion based on event

45
Q

Context in Emotion Recognition: Thayer (1980)

A

Ps saw 5 pictures: 4 had same expression; last one was contrasting

46
Q

Context in Emotion Recognition: Thayer (1980)

A

looks more sad after a bunch of happy ppl
we are interpreting facial expression based on context
seeing emotion in neutral face when you give them a contrast

47
Q

Context in Emotion Recognition: Schiffbauer (1974)

A

Ps put into states of disgust, amusement, no emotion

Judged emotions in facial expressions in photos

48
Q

Context in Emotion Recognition

A

when in disgusted state, they say disgust
your mood impacts how you see other ppl’s expressions
similar studies based on odour - pleasant or unpleasant

49
Q

Context in Emotion Recognition: Niedenthal et al. (2000)

A

Ps put into happy, sad, no mood
Viewed faces going from happy/sad to neutral
Ps said when the face shifted to neutral

50
Q

Niedenthal et al. (2000) Results

A

demarcation earlier when it matched your mood

takes longer for happy ppl to say happy face disappeared and shorter for sad ppl

51
Q

IV. Facial Feedback Hypothesis

A

facial expressions can cause us to feel emotion
effects are always very small
A. Modulating hypothesis - influence intensity of felt emotion initiated by some stimulus

52
Q

IV. Facial Feedback Hypothesis

A

B. Initiating hypothesis - generate corresponding
emotion when nothing in environment to induce emotion
no emotion to experiencing emotion by creating facial configution

53
Q

Facial Feedback: Niedenthal et al. (2001)

A

Ps watched facial expressions morph into other

expressions + detected when expression changed

54
Q

Facial Feedback: Niedenthal et al. (2001)

A

Some Ps allowed to mimic expressions
watched the face, mirror neurons allowed us to mimic
facial feedback to own brains

55
Q

Facial Feedback: Niedenthal et al. (2001)

A

Others held a pencil in their mouths, stopping them
from mimicking the expressions
stopping ppl from mimicking slows them down from recognizing facial expression of other person

56
Q

Facial Feedback – Measure

A

Amplification-suppression paradigm – exaggerate or conceal felt emotion
Muscle-to-muscle instruction paradigm – directly manipulate individuals’ face muscles
not telling them that they’re faking an emotion
for initiating hypothesis

57
Q

Facial Feedback

A

lower eyelid: subcortical
if we can’t do them, then we can’t create emotion
for modulating you can use either

58
Q

Modulating Hypothesis: Lanzetta, Cartwright-Smith, and Kleck (1976)

A

Received electric shocks of varying intensity
IV: Do nothing/suppress/amplify reaction to shocks
DV: Aversiveness of shock
Inhibition - decrease in arousal/self-reported painfulness of shocks
Amplification - increase

59
Q

Modulating Hypothesis

A

can control pain
when tried to surpress, felt less pain
physiological symptoms showed ppl felt more pain when they showed more pain

60
Q

Modulating Hypothesis: Laird (1974)

A

Ps contracted facial muscles involved in smiling/frowning while looking at slides:
Ku Klux Klan/kids playing
Smiling Ps - happier when viewing + slides
Frowning Ps fet angrier when viewing – slides

61
Q

Modulating Hypothesis: Laird (1974)

A

angry: put electrodes between eyebrows
when put in happy expression - modulated happiness level when viewing slides
when in angry position more angry or less angry

62
Q

Initiating Hypothesis: Duclos et al. (1989)

A

Ps contracted/relaxed facial muscles to make expressions of fear, anger, disgust, and sadness while listening to neutral tones (no emotion)
Rated emotions

63
Q

Initiating Hypothesis

A

more fearful faces - felt fear
disgust - felt disgust
went from nothing to some kind of emotion
muscle to muscle paradigm

64
Q

Initiating Hypothesis

A

Zajonc et al. (1989) - similar results pronouncing German vowels, such as ü and e
zajonc: e - happier/u - sadder

65
Q

Flack, Laird, and Cavallaro (1999)

A

muscle to muscle paradigm - feel sad - rated sadness as higher only without elevating other emotions
muscle to muscle paradigm - reported elevated fear and surprise

66
Q

Flack, Laird, and Cavallaro (1999)

A

muscle to muscle paradigm - higher than usual anger and also disgust
muscle to muscle paradigm - on avg ps reported greater happiness

67
Q

Flack, Laird, and Cavallaro (1999)

A

=

68
Q

Potential Mechanisms Behind Facial Feedback

A

Direct afferent feedback loop
feedback from facial muscles/skin link to motor cortex through afferent feedback loops
Activating one part of feedback loop influences rest Vascular theory of emotional efference (VTEE)

69
Q

Potential Mechanisms Behind Facial Feedback

A

 facial muscle activity regulates blood flow to brain, affecting brain temperature
 Brain temperature affects neurotransmitter release  emotional experience

70
Q

Potential Mechanisms Behind Facial Feedback

A

-

71
Q

Potential Mechanisms Behind Facial Feedback

A

-

72
Q

Potential Mechanisms Behind Facial Feedback

A

Bem’s self-perception theory (1972)

 Observe own behaviour and context to infer attitudes, preferences, feelings

73
Q

Potential Mechanisms Behind Facial Feedback

A

Laird (1974) - use facial feedback cues through self-perception

74
Q

Potential Mechanisms Behind Facial Feedback

A

=

75
Q

Potential Mechanisms Behind Facial Feedback

A

Classical conditioning

 expressions frequently paired with emotional state become conditioned to the state

76
Q

Facial Feedback

A

Spinal cord injuries

Facial muscle paralysis

77
Q

Facial Feedback

A

=

78
Q

Facial Feedback

A

Möbius syndromeunable to smile

Botox (Hunnenlotter et al., 2009)

79
Q

Facial Feedback

A

=

PSY331 (11 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions