Property Management - Assignation & Sublets Flashcards
1
Q
What is the difference between an assignation and sublet?
A
- Assignation – Legally removes the tenants responsibility for the unit and assigns it to another party
- Sublet – The tenant (now head tenant) remains legally responsible, however the sub tenant will take over occupation and pay rent to the head tenant (usually at a higher rate)
2
Q
What is the advantage of subletting?
A
- It takes financial pressure of the outgoing tenant.
- The head tenant may also make a profit rent.
3
Q
Can a landlord refuse a consent?
A
- Yes, however most leases state that a landlords consent must not be unreasonably withheld.
- International Drilling Fluids Ltd v Louisville Investments (Uxbridge) Ltd:
To protect the landlord form the premises being used in an undesirable way or by an undesirable assignee
4
Q
Why would a LL withhold consent for assignations
A
- The assignee does not have a strong covenant strength
- If the assignee’s covenant strength is weaker than the assignor
- If there are arrears
- If the assignor is in breach
- If a change of use is required
5
Q
Case Law for withholding consent
A
- If a reverse premium to be paid to the sub-tenant reduces the market rent for the property.
- The financial standing of the sub-tenant is weaker.
- The nature of the sub-tenants business is not suited.
6
Q
Case Law – Consent
A
- International Drilling Fluids Ltd v Louisville Investments (Uxbridge) Ltd
- To protect the landlord form the premises being used in an undesirable way or by an undesirable assignee
- Tenant has to prove that consent has been unreasonably withheld
- Landlord does not have to prove conclusions that led to refusal
- Can withhold due to the proposed use
7
Q
Case Law - Assignation with outstanding RR
A
- Lousada & Co v J.E. Lesser (Properties) Ltd
- It was not held unreasonable for a landlord to insist that consent to an assignation was conditional on a long outstanding rent review being settled
8
Q
Case Law - Assignation and Dilapidations
A
- A.B Leisure Ltd v Renfrew District Council
- Considered unreasonable to serve a schedule upon receipt of the application to assign and to make completion of it a condition of consent