physical fieldwork 3 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

where is the River Ogmore ? 4

A
  • in South Wales
  • runs from north to south
  • source - Ogmore Vale
  • mouth - Bristol Channel
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what was your hypotheses ?

A
  • velocity increases downstream due to the increased volume of water from tributaries joining, lateral erosion and less friction
  • cross sectional areas increases downstream due to vertical and lateral erosion
  • the bedload size decreases and becomes more round due to attrition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

why did you chose those hypotheses ?

A

we would be able to see the change easily throughout the course of the river

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what secondary data did you use ?

A
  • OS map to see distance downstream
  • weather forecast and receding weather
  • features affecting discharge
  • data collected by other groups in other years
  • igeology app on iPads
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what primary data did you collect ?

A
  • bedload size
  • width
  • velocity
  • pebble size
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how did you collect the width of the river data + and - ?

A
  • tape measure
  • hold tape measure from bank to bank
    + easy to read
  • had to make sure tape measure ends were exactly opposite
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how did you collect the depth of the river data + and - ?

A
  • metre stick
  • held metre stick in water
    + easy to read
  • ground was sometimes uneven
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how did you collect the cross sectional area of the river data ?

A
  • cross sectional area = width x depth

- measure width and depth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how did you collect the velocity of the river data + and - ?

A
  • use impeller
  • held impeller upstream
    + easy to obtain
  • sometimes didn’t work so had to move position of impeller
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how did you collect the river bedload and size data + and - ?

A
  • use callipers
  • picked random pebbles with mixed geology and measured them
  • used Powers’s visual comparison chart to see how rounded the pebbles were
    + easy to measure and read
  • slightly bias
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what risks did we face ? 5

A
  • drowning
  • poisonous plants
  • unsanitary water
  • trips and slips
  • tics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how did we manage those risks ? 5

A
  • no deeper than knee height in water
  • don’t eat plants
  • don’t drink water
  • wear suitable footwear
  • check skin for tics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how many sites did we visit, why and how were they chosen ?

A
  • stratified
  • 4 sites
  • chose areas we expected to see most change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what graphs did we use ? 6

A
  • field sketches
  • cross section
  • bar charts
  • located proportional flow arrows
  • scatter graph
  • % bar chart
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what do you put in your analysis ?

A
  • statistics and data
  • how did bedload, cross section and velocity change downstream
  • did it follow Bradshaw’s model
  • why did the river change this way
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how did bedload, cross-sectional area and velocity change downstream ?

A
  • bedload got smaller and more rounded from site 1-4 due to attrition and as velocity increases beload hits each other more often. site 1 mean bedload size was 700.6 mm whereas at site 4 the mean bedload size was 158.7 mm
  • cross sectional area increases downstream due to vertical erosion, corrosion and abrasion. site 1 cross sectional area was 0.025 m(squared) site 4 was 1.352 m(squared)
  • velocity increases downstream due to tributaries joining the river, less friction and vertical and lateral erosion. Site 1 was 0.12 m/s and site 4 was 0.45 m/s
17
Q

did it follow Bradshaw’s model ?

A

yes because

18
Q

did it follow Bradshaw’s model ?

A
  • yes
  • bedload size decreased
  • mean velocity increased
  • got deeper
  • got wider
  • cross sectional area increased
19
Q

what did we conclude ?

A

that our hypothesis were correct

20
Q

what do you put in your evaluation ?

A
  • how accurate/reliable our investigation was
  • what our sampling methods were
  • what were our results
  • how we can improve this investigation
21
Q

how accurate and reliable was our investigation ?

A

very reliable because we created our own results but referred them to older ones and looked at models which summarise the results we should obtain

22
Q

what were our sampling methods ?

A
  • random
  • systematic
  • stratified
23
Q

how could we improve our investigation ?

A

be less bias

24
Q

what was the cross sectional area difference from site 1 to 4 ?

A

1 - 0.025 m(squared)

4 - 1.352 m(squared)

25
Q

what was the velocity difference from site 1 to 4 ?

A

1 - 0.12 m/s

4 - 0.45 m/s

26
Q

what was the bedload size difference from site 1 to 4 ?

A

1 - 700.6 mm

4 - 158.7 mm