Personality (11.8 Lecture) Flashcards

1
Q

what is personality?

A

an individual’s characteristic patterns of thought, emotion, and behavior, together with biology and psychology to determine the social mechanisms of these patterns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how can we interpret what personality is?

A

implies consistency, its the stuff in your head and the stuff you do, it is the easy you are the way you are, and it is caused by the interaction of many forces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

who is sigmund freud

A

oldest of 8 kids, was definitely the favorite. he studied hysteria with Josef Breuer and didn’t find any underlying neurological problems. He established the “talking cure” to help patients with hysteria to start to be cured (ex. numbness would fade)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

freud’s theory about self

A

Id, Ego, Superego

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

the topographical model

A

(glacier metaphor)
conscious: Ego & superego
preconscious: Ego & superego
unconscious: superego & Id

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

the structural model

A
  1. Id
  2. Ego
  3. Superego
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Id

A

the “it,” original personality system – according to our pleasure principle
- cauldron of excitation and tension
- operates to decrease tension through reflexes and primary processes (no self-control)
- immediate desires

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ego

A

the “I,” develops out of id – according to the reality principle
- arises because the need to interface with the outside world
- aims to prevent the discharge of tension until an appropriate object has been discovered (self-control)
- monitors preconsciousness and keeps undesirable thoughts from coming to the surface

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Superego

A

the “over-I,” last personality system to develop – “goodie-2-shoes”
- internal representation of societal values
- represents the ideal rather than the real, strive for perfection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how do the 3 systems work together?

A

they create a balance, similar to devil and angel on your shoulder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

common Freud model tropes

A

HP: Ron(id), Hermione(superego), Harry(ego)
- usually hero characters with a strong sense of self-control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Freud’s legacy

A
  • he lay much of the foundation for future science but little of what he pushed forth is still used today in that form
  • feelings, thoughts, behaviors are impacted by outside conscious awareness
  • early life experiences shape development
  • therapeutic value of talking/ expression
  • mind-body connection: our physical health can be shaped by psychological forces
  • we experience conflicting motivations (desires, development, process of managing conflicts)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

delay of gratification study

A

“marshmallow test” inspired by Freud
a kid is given a marshmallow and told if they don’t eat it for 15 minutes they can get another marshmallow. There is a strong correlation between waiting and SAT score, income, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Gordon Allport

A

established personality hypotheses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

lexical hypothesis

A

individual differences are important to people and so these differences have been encoded into our language over time so that we can communicate about them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

factor analysis of traits

A

Allport had an employee find every word used to describe human behavior in the dictionary (more than 18,000 words). The words were then zoomed in onto the traits (around 5,000 words) and then did a factor analysis –> “clumps of words” that mean similar things (ex. talkative ~ energetic)

17
Q

big 5

A
  1. openness (open-mindedness)
  2. conscientiousness
  3. extraversion
  4. agreeableness
  5. neuroticism (emotional stability)
18
Q
  1. openness (open-mindedness)
A

original, curious, active imagination
(reverse-scored) prefers work/ routine

19
Q
  1. conscientiousness
A

thorough job, does things efficiently, makes plans and follows through with them
(reverse-scored) somewhat careless

20
Q
  1. extraversion
A

talkative, full of energy, generates lots of enthusiasm
(reverse-scored) reserved

21
Q
  1. agreeabless
A

helpful, unselfish, forgiving, trusting
(reverse-scored) cold, aloof

22
Q
  1. neuroticism (emotional stability)
A

depressed, can be tense, nervous easily
(reverse-scored) handles stress well

23
Q

how long does it take to infer someone’s personality?

A

Nalini Ambady, “thin slicing” study
ability to accurately infer someone’s personality based on brief excerpt of expressive behavior (less than 5 mins)
- can especially infer extraversion and agreeabless
- behavior excerpt has to be dynamic (not a photo) and communicative

24
Q

example of behavior excerpt and thin slicing study

A

watching first 5 mins of Dr. Hard’s lecture, being able to infer she’s very extraverted, confident, etc.

25
Q

easy way to remember personality traits

A

O.C.E.A.N

26
Q

is the big 5 legit?

A

yes
- high cross-cultural replicability
- high heritability
- predicts behavior (online)

27
Q

some exceptions to cross-cultural replicability of big 5

A

some additional personalities:
- “honesty-humility” (Dutch, French, German, Hungarian, Italian)
- “concerns for others” (Filipino samples)

  • no dimensions (Tsimané people are illiterate, Bolivia)
28
Q

proving high heritability of big 5

A

differences are reflected in differences in genes
- monozygotic and dizygotic twins, monozygotic are closer in personality
- twins reared apart (Bouchard study): got 100 pairs of twins reared apart, and similar down to random things (remember ex in beginning with nazi and jew)

29
Q

predicting behavior online (study) proving big 5

A

(75,000 facebook user study): word clouds for words most used by people of various populations, consistent with personality traits

30
Q

Walter Mischel

A

(from marshmallow task) thought that maybe personality is less consistent if its an “if…then” situation and depends on person-situation interactions

31
Q

(redo of marshmallow study with change)

A

reliable vs. unreliable researcher
- found when more reliable, they waited longer vs. if they were more unreliable
- associated with SEI because if from a lower income world, assume someone in power is less dependable and thus less likely to trust researchers (if environment is less trustworthy, the adaptive thing to do is to take the good thing while it lasts)

32
Q

what is the impact of the second marshmallow study?

A

being in a reliable environment makes it easier to use and develop self-control

33
Q

self-esteem

A

people’s subjective feelings of their worth and value

34
Q

self-esteem study

A

someone who says they have low self-esteem and their partner are brought into the office
- control: both people asked to write down things they don’t like about their partner
- experiment: other partner is asked to write down every object in their house and insecure partner is asked to write down everything they don’t like about their partner. they see their partner writing furiously and think they are writing about their negative features so they retaliate
result: for experiment, low self-esteem person retaliates and says they don’t feel close to their partner

35
Q

what is the impact of the self-esteem study?

A

understand how person-situation interactions help us understand and prevent a vicious cycle (feel insecure and think their partner doesn’t like them, so then retaliate until partner actually doesn’t like them and creates reality they’re afraid of)
- have to understand the context to understand behavior