Paper 2 Mistakes Review Flashcards
Keys in hypothesis
IV, DV, “significantly”!
Writing standardised instructions
Participants are going to…
Participants will be…
Participants will then…
Ask for consent
“Discuss” 4m needs…
at least 2 relevant evals
Case studies > Quantitative data
Richer/detailed data
Possibly longitudinal (increases internal validity)
More eco. v.
Designing a report (specific methods section)
Design = type of experiment, experimental design, identifying IV and DV, control over EVs, ethical considerations
Participants = Target population, sampling method, allocation of participants to testing conditions
Materials = equipment needed
Procedure = Logical step-by-step description
SLT key terms
Observational learning, modelling, imitation, influence
“vicarious reinforcement”
“mediating factors”
Theoretical models (cognitive)
+Ve Allows experimental study of processes (such as attention, memory, problem solving, and perception).
-Ve Dehumanising.
-Ve Inferences lack cause/effect
Features of biological approach
Genetic explanations
Biochemistry; imbalances of chemicals influencing behaviour (e.g. low serotonin = depression).
CNS, endocrine system
Interaction bw genotype and phenotype
Maslow 3 categories
Deficiency needs, growth needs, personal growth
Rogers key term for counselling
Unconditional positive regard
One negative for humanist
Western ideals
Standard deviation vs range
distance from mean > distance from highest/lowest values
less easily distorted by a single extreme score
How to obtain stratified sample
- Put all names of one strata into a hat, another strata into another.
- Determine proportion (strata/total population * participants)
- Randomly select from 1st hat and assign to condition A. Again random select and assign B. Repeat
- Repeat process with other stratas.
Why do type I and II errors occur
Level of significance set too low.
Lack of statistical evidence to reject null.
“Test-retest reliability”
later date set to assess whether research correlates.
Advising economic implications
use public money elsewhere (education, teaching, etc)
Designing a consent form
Purpose
Ethical considerations
Format (name, date, sign)
Outline Maslow’s hierarchy
Physiological
Safety/Security
Love/Belonging
Esteem
Self actualisation
Genotype vs Phenotype
Genotype = genetic make up, not observable.
Phenotype = Traits/characteristics, combine G + E, is observable/measurable (height, weight).
Case study ao1 and ao3
Indepth analysis, typically qualitative, longitudinal, idiographic.
-Ve Researcher bias,
NO generalisability, replicability, cause-effect, statistically analysed, prediction/control.
Difference bw qualitative and quantitative
Qual - Descriptive, cannot be statistically analysed but has depth of understanding.
Quant - numbers, mean/median/mode
e.g. qual data (not case study)
“unstructured” interviews
Retrospective data
fill in the gaps = : ( low reliability
Key point on standardisation
not always for others, for self too!
“Evaluate the use of [ ] in this study” 6m breakdown
ao1 = 2, <——-
ao2 = 2
ao3 = 2.
Observer bias
Looking for particular behaviour fitting own expectations or misinterpret behaviour to fit in with pre-existing ideas.
Format of informed consent
Letter
Intermediate premise for content analysis (before giving specific e.g.s)
create checklist of lots of behaviours looking for behaviour in terms of positives and negatives.