Obediance SI Flashcards
obediance def
is a form of social influence in which an individual follows a direct order. The person issuing the order is usually a figure of authority, who has the power to punish when obedient behaviour is not forthcoming
confederate
a person one works with, especially in something secret or illegal; an accomplice
Milgrams motivation for his research
**Milgram’s **parents were Jewish and had emigrated after WW1. Milgram had a strong sense of his Jewish identity (personal interest)
→ Eichmann was a German who helped investigate ways to dispose of ‘unwanted’ jews
Milgrams baseline procedure
- 40 American men volunteered ( aged 20-50)
- Test was on “memory”
- Volunteer was introduced to another participant ( confederate of Milgram)
- Fixed chances on who would be teacher and learner → participant was always teacher
- Was always another confederate there as an experimenter
- The voltage level given to participants to test it was 45 volts
aim of milgrams study
to assess obedience in a situation where an authority figure (experimenter) ordered the participant (teacher) to give an increasingly strong shock to a learner located in a different room
Milgrams baseline findings
- All participants delivered shock up to 300 volts
- 5 participants stopped at 300 volts
- 65% continued to the highest level of 450 volts
examples
MIlgram also collected qualitative data
- Sweat
- Tremble
- Stutter
- Bite their lips
- Groan
- Dig fingernails into hands
- Full-blown uncontrollable seizures
milgram
Other data
- 14 psychology students estimated that no more than 3% of participants would go up to 450 volts
- Findings were unexpected
- All participants were debriefed that their actions were normal
- 84% participants said they were glad to have taken part
MIlgrams baseline conclusions
- German people are not different
- Participants were willing to obey orders even when they might harm another person
- Conducted further studies
strengths
research support for** milgrams** study
Milgram’s findings were replicated in a documentary
- Beauvois 2012
- Game show
- Results were almost identical to milgram’s participants
Supports Milgram’s original findings about obedience to authority
limitation
Alternative interpretation of milgrams findings
blind obedience may not be justified
* Haslam 2014
* Social identity theory → participants only obeyed when they identified with the scientific aims of the research
limitation and strength
low internal validity in milgrams study
point + counterpoint
Subject to demand characteristics
* 75% of participants thought the shocks were genuine
* **Holland 1968
* ** Perry 2013
Sheridan and King conducted a study but with a puppy and had real shocks, 54% of men gave the fatal shock and 100% of women gave the fatal shock
limitation
ethical issues in MIlgrams study
Participants were deceived
- Baumrind 1964 believed that deception had serious consequences