negotiation Flashcards
negotiation definition
art and science of securing an agreement between two or more interdependent parties who are seeking to maximize their outcomes. the negotiated agreement will guide and regulate their future behavior
-multiple parites
-interaction based
-seeking to reach agreement
-formally/informally guides and regulates behavior
basic concepts
BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement)
aspiration level/ target
reservation price
bargaining zone
BATNA
best alternative to a negotiated agreement
What are you going to do if you do not
make a deal with this person?
Determined by your available
alternatives
Defines most you will pay (buyer) &
least you will accept (seller)
Key source of power: Ability to walk
away
batna = your ____
greatest source of power
do everything you can to improve your batna before you negotiate (e.g. alternative trading partners)
your counterparts’ perceptions of your BATNA are also very important
- give a positive impression about your batna, but dont disclose specific values of your batna
aspiration level/target
your “ideal” settlement price or outcome
RP = reservation price
point of indifference or “walk-away” point
Your BATNA +/- factors that make you want to do this deal (opportunity costs, switching costs, ego)
E.g., how much you are willing to spend (buyer); least you can accept (seller)
Never reveal your reservation point
bargaining range (ZOPA)
zone of possible agreements
the ZOPA is the range between the buyer’s reservation price and the seller’s reservation price
interests
central concerns underlying one’s preferences
e.g. profitability; quality; timing; sense of fairness
additional basic concepts
interest
issues
distributive vs. integrative negotiations
issues
specific items to be negotiated
e.g. price, delivery date, etc
types of issues
compatible issues
- goals that exist in parallel
- my needs = your needs
options here:
momentum building
strategic misrepresentation
types of issues
distributive/competitive issues
areas in which desires are directly opposed
“zero-sum” issues
options:
concession making
hardball negotiation
fairness
types of issues
integrative issues
- goals are not completely in opposition
- may see beneficial trades and deals that vary in efficiency
options:
exchanging information and maximizing the pie
guarding information to avoid exploitation
distributive negotiations
involve fixed-sum games - one person’s gain is another person’s loss
almost directly conflicting interest - each party is attempting to maximize his/her share of the fixed-sum payoff
simply dividing the “pie”
parties often dont know how large the “pie” actually is or how small a piece the other party will settle for
Integrative Negotiations
Involves finding opportunities for both
parties to get more of what they want
Discovering opportunities to add more value
to the deal
Growing the pie
Multiple Issues are present
Participants are Cooperative; willing to share
information
Multiple Solutions are considered
Complex Packages are compared