MOOC Adoption Lifecycle and Innovation Adoption at the Individual Level Flashcards
Adoption
Acceptance of an innovation by people in society or by specific markets - different people reach differently to new things
Adoption lifecycle
Represents number of people adopting a product over time from the moment it becomes available
Adoption lifecycle 5 different sections
Innovators Early adopters Early majority Late majority Laggards
Innovators
No difficulty with complex, new tech and embrace the challenge instead
Early adopters
Don’t focus on tech itself but are more enthusiastic about applications of an innovation and are very imaginative about uses
Early majority
Innovations more practically and care about how the innovation can be useful to them - need clarifications about use
Late majortiy
Need to be extremely sure that the product has strong support system and that it will not disappoint
Laggards
Assess innovations skeptically and only accept very few that seem interesting to them
Chasm (innovation lifecycle)
Gap that indicates that there is a big difference between early adopters and early majority. Early adopters are visionaries, early majority need to be confident before accepting innovation
Early adopters vs early majority
Early adopters - intuitive, take risks, motivated by possible opportunities
Early majority - analytical, manage risks, choose for certainty, choose products that have use for them
For innovators and early adopters to accept, innovation should be: (innovation central)
Best product
Elegant architecture
Unique functionality
For mainstream market accept: (market central)
Cater to largest group of customers in its category
Current standard
High quality of customer support
Crossing the chasm
Adapt innovation to fit more attractive mainstream market
e.g. Apple mini no graphical interface - next iteration graphical interface for mainstream market
Kahneman evaluation of alternatives points
Value is subjective
Point of reference - when evaluating innovation
Improvements are gains, shortcoming are losses
Losses have far bigger impact than improvements
Kahneman conclusions (betting scenario)
People only participate when the value of the potential gain is higher than the value of potential loss
Once people have something they want to keep it